U.S. General Accounting Office |
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP) |
Q81--2000:. About how many cases of wetlands in your county were mitigated through enhancement, that is improvement of another wetland, in 2000? |
Mean | Minimum | Maximum | Median | Number of respondents | |
Alabama | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Arkansas | 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
California | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Colorado | 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Florida | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Georgia | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Idaho | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Illinois | 20.0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 |
Indiana | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Iowa | 1.3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Kansas | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Kentucky | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Louisiana | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Maryland | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Michigan | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Minnesota | 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Mississippi | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Missouri | 2.0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Montana | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Nebraska | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
New Mexico | . | . | . | . | 0 |
New York | . | . | . | . | 0 |
North Carolina | . | . | . | . | 0 |
North Dakota | 5.0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 |
Ohio | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Oklahoma | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Oregon | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Pennsylvania | . | . | . | . | 0 |
South Carolina | . | . | . | . | 0 |
South Dakota | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Tennessee | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Texas | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Utah | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Virginia | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Washington | . | . | . | . | 0 |
West Virginia | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Wisconsin | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
States with fewer than 15 respondents | . | . | . | . | 0 |
All States | 2.5 | 1 | 20 | 2 | 22 |