U.S. General Accounting Office |
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP) |
Q86--1997:. In your county, about how many cases were granted a minimal effect exemption for agricultural purposes in 1997? |
Mean | Minimum | Maximum | Median | Number of respondents | |
Alabama | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Arkansas | 2.0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
California | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Colorado | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Florida | 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Georgia | 2.3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Idaho | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Illinois | 2.7 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
Indiana | 2.0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Iowa | 2.0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
Kansas | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Kentucky | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Louisiana | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Maryland | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Michigan | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Minnesota | 2.0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 14 |
Mississippi | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Missouri | 4.0 | 1 | 15 | 2 | 6 |
Montana | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Nebraska | 3.8 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 17 |
New Mexico | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
New York | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
North Carolina | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
North Dakota | 5.8 | 1 | 22 | 3 | 9 |
Ohio | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Oklahoma | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Oregon | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Pennsylvania | . | . | . | . | 0 |
South Carolina | . | . | . | . | 0 |
South Dakota | 4.6 | 1 | 15 | 3 | 23 |
Tennessee | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Texas | 6.0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 2 |
Utah | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Virginia | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Washington | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
West Virginia | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Wisconsin | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
States with fewer than 15 respondents | 1.3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
All States | 2.8 | 1 | 22 | 1 | 137 |