U.S. General Accounting Office |
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP) |
Q86--1999:. In your county, about how many cases were granted a minimal effect exemption for agricultural purposes in 1999? |
Mean | Minimum | Maximum | Median | Number of respondents | |
Alabama | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Arkansas | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
California | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Colorado | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Florida | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Georgia | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Idaho | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Illinois | 1.8 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
Indiana | 2.1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
Iowa | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
Kansas | 1.3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Kentucky | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Louisiana | 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Maryland | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Michigan | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Minnesota | 2.9 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 16 |
Mississippi | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Missouri | 12.4 | 1 | 58 | 1 | 5 |
Montana | 1.3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Nebraska | 4.2 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 17 |
New Mexico | . | . | . | . | 0 |
New York | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
North Carolina | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
North Dakota | 4.5 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 11 |
Ohio | 1.3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Oklahoma | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Oregon | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Pennsylvania | . | . | . | . | 0 |
South Carolina | . | . | . | . | 0 |
South Dakota | 4.7 | 1 | 20 | 4 | 24 |
Tennessee | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Texas | 2.7 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
Utah | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Virginia | 1.7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Washington | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
West Virginia | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Wisconsin | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
States with fewer than 15 respondents | 1.3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
All States | 3.2 | 1 | 58 | 1 | 134 |