U.S. General Accounting Office |
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP) |
Q86--2000:. In your county, about how many cases were granted a minimal effect exemption for agricultural purposes in 2000? |
Mean | Minimum | Maximum | Median | Number of respondents | |
Alabama | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Arkansas | 2.8 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
California | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Colorado | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Florida | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Georgia | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Idaho | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Illinois | 2.0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
Indiana | 1.9 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
Iowa | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Kansas | 1.4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
Kentucky | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Louisiana | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Maryland | 1.7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Michigan | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Minnesota | 3.1 | 1 | 20 | 2 | 13 |
Mississippi | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Missouri | 9.7 | 1 | 53 | 1 | 6 |
Montana | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Nebraska | 3.5 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 15 |
New Mexico | . | . | . | . | 0 |
New York | . | . | . | . | 0 |
North Carolina | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
North Dakota | 3.8 | 1 | 17 | 2 | 12 |
Ohio | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Oklahoma | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Oregon | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Pennsylvania | 3.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
South Carolina | . | . | . | . | 0 |
South Dakota | 4.8 | 1 | 18 | 3 | 29 |
Tennessee | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Texas | 3.5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
Utah | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Virginia | 2.0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Washington | . | . | . | . | 0 |
West Virginia | . | . | . | . | 0 |
Wisconsin | 1.3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
States with fewer than 15 respondents | 1.8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
All States | 3.3 | 1 | 53 | 2 | 131 |