U.S. General Accounting Office
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP)
Q23e. In your county, how did the following changes in the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (farm bill) strengthen or weaken monitoring of HELC compliance?: Other (please specify).

  Significantly strengthened (percent) Strengthened (percent) Neither strengthened nor weakened (percent) Weakened (percent) Significantly weakend (percent) Number of respondents
Alabama 0 0 0 0 0 0
Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0
California 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 1
Colorado 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2
Florida 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2
Georgia 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 2
Iowa 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 5
Idaho 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 6
Illinois 0.0 0.0 71.4 0.0 28.6 7
Indiana 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3
Kansas 0.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 5
Kentucky 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2
Louisiana 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3
Maryland 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 1
Michigan 0.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 3
Minnesota 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2
Missouri 0.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 4
Mississippi 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 5
Montana 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2
North Carolina 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2
North Dakota 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 2
Nebraska 40.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 0.0 5
New Mexico 0 0 0 0 0 0
New York 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2
Ohio 0.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 3
Oklahoma 0.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 4
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pennsylvania 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 1
South Carolina 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1
South Dakota 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3
Tennessee 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 1
Texas 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 5
Utah 0 0 0 0 0 0
Virginia 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1
Washington 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 1
Wisconsin 20.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 60.0 5
West Virginia 0 0 0 0 0 0
States with fewer than 15 respondents 0.0 14.3 71.4 0.0 14.3 7
All States 4.1 2.0 54.1 11.2 28.6 98