U.S. General Accounting Office
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP)
Q40b. In your county, how did each of the following changes in the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (farm bill) strengthen or weaken monitoring of wetland conservation compliance?: Instituted minimal effects exemption.

  Significantly strengthened (percent) Strengthened (percent) Neither strengthened nor weakened (percent) Weakened (percent) Significantly weakend (percent) Number of respondents
Alabama 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 4
Arkansas 12.5 37.5 25.0 25.0 0.0 8
California 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2
Colorado 0 0 0 0 0 0
Florida 0.0 85.7 14.3 0.0 0.0 7
Georgia 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 0.0 7
Iowa 0.0 19.0 33.3 38.1 9.5 21
Idaho 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1
Illinois 0.0 25.8 35.5 25.8 12.9 31
Indiana 5.3 21.1 42.1 26.3 5.3 19
Kansas 0.0 16.7 50.0 0.0 33.3 6
Kentucky 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 1
Louisiana 0.0 35.7 57.1 7.1 0.0 14
Maryland 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 0.0 3
Michigan 9.1 9.1 63.6 0.0 18.2 11
Minnesota 0.0 16.3 55.1 18.4 10.2 49
Missouri 8.7 34.8 43.5 8.7 4.3 23
Mississippi 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 0.0 6
Montana 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 3
North Carolina 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 0.0 7
North Dakota 0.0 30.0 40.0 25.0 5.0 20
Nebraska 5.6 36.1 44.4 13.9 0.0 36
New Mexico 0 0 0 0 0 0
New York 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 0.0 7
Ohio 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 7
Oklahoma 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2
Oregon 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3
Pennsylvania 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 8
South Carolina 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2
South Dakota 3.8 38.5 30.8 26.9 0.0 26
Tennessee 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 0.0 7
Texas 0.0 0.0 85.7 0.0 14.3 7
Utah 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 1
Virginia 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 5
Washington 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 3
Wisconsin 0.0 17.9 60.7 10.7 10.7 28
West Virginia 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 2
States with fewer than 15 respondents 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 0.0 7
All States 2.8 26.1 47.5 18.0 5.6 394