U.S. General Accounting Office
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP)
Q44. How effective is coordination between NRCS and FSA in implementing compliance with the HELC and wetland conservation provisions, overall?

  Extremely effective (percent) Very effective (percent) Moderately effective (percent) Somewhat effective (percent) Slightly or not effective (percent) Number of respondents
Alabama 8.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 12.0 50
Arkansas 7.0 51.2 18.6 14.0 9.3 43
California 6.5 41.9 32.3 19.4 0.0 31
Colorado 4.9 41.5 22.0 19.5 12.2 41
Florida 22.6 35.5 25.8 9.7 6.5 31
Georgia 6.8 39.0 33.9 8.5 11.9 59
Iowa 8.8 35.0 26.3 20.0 10.0 80
Idaho 10.7 32.1 32.1 17.9 7.1 28
Illinois 8.0 34.7 30.7 16.0 10.7 75
Indiana 9.5 38.1 30.2 15.9 6.3 63
Kansas 4.3 40.4 31.9 13.8 9.6 94
Kentucky 11.1 43.1 27.8 11.1 6.9 72
Louisiana 14.0 44.2 30.2 11.6 0.0 43
Maryland 13.3 46.7 20.0 6.7 13.3 15
Michigan 6.3 35.4 35.4 12.5 10.4 48
Minnesota 10.1 40.6 30.4 15.9 2.9 69
Missouri 11.8 38.2 34.2 10.5 5.3 76
Mississippi 4.5 53.0 27.3 10.6 4.5 66
Montana 2.3 34.1 29.5 25.0 9.1 44
North Carolina 12.5 48.6 20.8 12.5 5.6 72
North Dakota 4.2 27.1 35.4 22.9 10.4 48
Nebraska 4.2 34.7 29.2 20.8 11.1 72
New Mexico 9.5 19.0 33.3 23.8 14.3 21
New York 10.3 30.8 25.6 7.7 25.6 39
Ohio 3.4 52.5 28.8 11.9 3.4 59
Oklahoma 8.3 28.3 43.3 10.0 10.0 60
Oregon 19.0 47.6 14.3 9.5 9.5 21
Pennsylvania 10.3 38.5 35.9 7.7 7.7 39
South Carolina 24.1 34.5 24.1 10.3 6.9 29
South Dakota 1.9 41.5 32.1 13.2 11.3 53
Tennessee 9.3 48.1 18.5 11.1 13.0 54
Texas 9.9 39.7 28.5 9.9 11.9 151
Utah 21.4 42.9 14.3 14.3 7.1 14
Virginia 5.0 60.0 20.0 12.5 2.5 40
Washington 20.0 24.0 44.0 8.0 4.0 25
Wisconsin 15.7 35.3 23.5 17.6 7.8 51
West Virginia 9.1 40.9 22.7 22.7 4.5 22
States with fewer than 15 respondents 8.8 39.7 23.5 13.2 14.7 68
All States 9.0 39.5 28.7 14.0 8.9 1,966