U.S. General Accounting Office
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP)
Q53. In your opinion, how would increasing the number of annual status reviews in your county affect producers' compliance with the conservation provisions?

  Very greatly increasese compliance (percent) Greatly increase compliance (percent) Moderately increase compliance (percent) Somewhat increase compliance (percent) Slightly or not increase compliance (percent) Number of respondents
Alabama 0.0 4.1 16.3 12.2 67.3 49
Arkansas 2.7 5.4 10.8 13.5 67.6 37
California 0.0 0.0 10.7 14.3 75.0 28
Colorado 0.0 4.9 14.6 14.6 65.9 41
Florida 0.0 3.6 21.4 17.9 57.1 28
Georgia 2.0 8.0 14.0 8.0 68.0 50
Iowa 0.0 12.5 25.0 25.0 37.5 80
Idaho 3.8 3.8 19.2 3.8 69.2 26
Illinois 1.4 13.5 21.6 21.6 41.9 74
Indiana 4.8 9.7 22.6 6.5 56.5 62
Kansas 1.1 2.2 11.8 18.3 66.7 93
Kentucky 1.5 1.5 11.8 17.6 67.6 68
Louisiana 0.0 2.4 4.9 19.5 73.2 41
Maryland 6.7 0.0 6.7 0.0 86.7 15
Michigan 4.5 11.4 11.4 15.9 56.8 44
Minnesota 3.0 6.0 23.9 28.4 38.8 67
Missouri 1.4 10.8 10.8 12.2 64.9 74
Mississippi 0.0 6.6 21.3 16.4 55.7 61
Montana 0.0 4.5 9.1 11.4 75.0 44
North Carolina 3.0 4.5 16.7 7.6 68.2 66
North Dakota 0.0 4.1 18.4 16.3 61.2 49
Nebraska 1.4 11.1 16.7 12.5 58.3 72
New Mexico 0.0 10.0 5.0 20.0 65.0 20
New York 0.0 8.1 10.8 16.2 64.9 37
Ohio 1.7 6.9 15.5 6.9 69.0 58
Oklahoma 0.0 1.8 5.3 12.3 80.7 57
Oregon 0.0 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 19
Pennsylvania 2.5 7.5 22.5 20.0 47.5 40
South Carolina 0.0 0.0 11.1 7.4 81.5 27
South Dakota 1.9 3.8 7.7 17.3 69.2 52
Tennessee 0.0 1.9 11.5 17.3 69.2 52
Texas 1.4 2.1 11.7 12.4 72.4 145
Utah 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 13
Virginia 0.0 2.6 23.1 23.1 51.3 39
Washington 0.0 0.0 4.2 20.8 75.0 24
Wisconsin 0.0 3.9 21.6 13.7 60.8 51
West Virginia 4.5 0.0 0.0 13.6 81.8 22
States with fewer than 15 respondents 0.0 4.5 16.4 11.9 67.2 67
All States 1.3 5.4 14.7 15.1 63.5 1,892