| U.S. General Accounting Office |
| Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP) |
| Q61a. If a farmer has a farmed wetland (FW) with an existing hydrologic manipulation, would the farmer be able to do the following?: Expand the manipulation to remove all remaining hydrology and farm the area. |
| Yes (percent) | No (percent) | Number of respondents | |
| Alabama | 0.0 | 100.0 | 40 |
| Arkansas | 0.0 | 100.0 | 36 |
| California | 0.0 | 100.0 | 24 |
| Colorado | 0.0 | 100.0 | 30 |
| Florida | 0.0 | 100.0 | 27 |
| Georgia | 1.8 | 98.2 | 55 |
| Iowa | 0.0 | 100.0 | 80 |
| Idaho | 0.0 | 100.0 | 24 |
| Illinois | 1.3 | 98.7 | 75 |
| Indiana | 3.6 | 96.4 | 55 |
| Kansas | 2.4 | 97.6 | 85 |
| Kentucky | 2.0 | 98.0 | 49 |
| Louisiana | 0.0 | 100.0 | 43 |
| Maryland | 0.0 | 100.0 | 13 |
| Michigan | 0.0 | 100.0 | 47 |
| Minnesota | 1.5 | 98.5 | 68 |
| Missouri | 0.0 | 100.0 | 64 |
| Mississippi | 3.4 | 96.6 | 59 |
| Montana | 0.0 | 100.0 | 41 |
| North Carolina | 0.0 | 100.0 | 46 |
| North Dakota | 4.4 | 95.6 | 45 |
| Nebraska | 0.0 | 100.0 | 69 |
| New Mexico | 0.0 | 100.0 | 15 |
| New York | 2.6 | 97.4 | 39 |
| Ohio | 0.0 | 100.0 | 56 |
| Oklahoma | 0.0 | 100.0 | 50 |
| Oregon | 0.0 | 100.0 | 20 |
| Pennsylvania | 0.0 | 100.0 | 31 |
| South Carolina | 0.0 | 100.0 | 26 |
| South Dakota | 2.0 | 98.0 | 51 |
| Tennessee | 0.0 | 100.0 | 48 |
| Texas | 0.0 | 100.0 | 106 |
| Utah | 0.0 | 100.0 | 15 |
| Virginia | 0.0 | 100.0 | 36 |
| Washington | 0.0 | 100.0 | 23 |
| Wisconsin | 0.0 | 100.0 | 51 |
| West Virginia | 0.0 | 100.0 | 18 |
| States with fewer than 15 respondents | 1.6 | 98.4 | 62 |
| All States | 0.9 | 99.1 | 1,722 |