U.S. General Accounting Office |
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP) |
Q61a. If a farmer has a farmed wetland (FW) with an existing hydrologic manipulation, would the farmer be able to do the following?: Expand the manipulation to remove all remaining hydrology and farm the area. |
Yes (percent) | No (percent) | Number of respondents | |
Alabama | 0.0 | 100.0 | 40 |
Arkansas | 0.0 | 100.0 | 36 |
California | 0.0 | 100.0 | 24 |
Colorado | 0.0 | 100.0 | 30 |
Florida | 0.0 | 100.0 | 27 |
Georgia | 1.8 | 98.2 | 55 |
Iowa | 0.0 | 100.0 | 80 |
Idaho | 0.0 | 100.0 | 24 |
Illinois | 1.3 | 98.7 | 75 |
Indiana | 3.6 | 96.4 | 55 |
Kansas | 2.4 | 97.6 | 85 |
Kentucky | 2.0 | 98.0 | 49 |
Louisiana | 0.0 | 100.0 | 43 |
Maryland | 0.0 | 100.0 | 13 |
Michigan | 0.0 | 100.0 | 47 |
Minnesota | 1.5 | 98.5 | 68 |
Missouri | 0.0 | 100.0 | 64 |
Mississippi | 3.4 | 96.6 | 59 |
Montana | 0.0 | 100.0 | 41 |
North Carolina | 0.0 | 100.0 | 46 |
North Dakota | 4.4 | 95.6 | 45 |
Nebraska | 0.0 | 100.0 | 69 |
New Mexico | 0.0 | 100.0 | 15 |
New York | 2.6 | 97.4 | 39 |
Ohio | 0.0 | 100.0 | 56 |
Oklahoma | 0.0 | 100.0 | 50 |
Oregon | 0.0 | 100.0 | 20 |
Pennsylvania | 0.0 | 100.0 | 31 |
South Carolina | 0.0 | 100.0 | 26 |
South Dakota | 2.0 | 98.0 | 51 |
Tennessee | 0.0 | 100.0 | 48 |
Texas | 0.0 | 100.0 | 106 |
Utah | 0.0 | 100.0 | 15 |
Virginia | 0.0 | 100.0 | 36 |
Washington | 0.0 | 100.0 | 23 |
Wisconsin | 0.0 | 100.0 | 51 |
West Virginia | 0.0 | 100.0 | 18 |
States with fewer than 15 respondents | 1.6 | 98.4 | 62 |
All States | 0.9 | 99.1 | 1,722 |