| U.S. General Accounting Office |
| Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP) |
| Q61b. If a farmer has a farmed wetland (FW) with an existing hydrologic manipulation, would the farmer be able to do the following?: Maintain the scope and effect of the maintenance performed prior to December 23, 1985, but not exceed that level of drainage. |
| Yes (percent) | No (percent) | Number of respondents | |
| Alabama | 100.0 | 0.0 | 41 |
| Arkansas | 94.6 | 5.4 | 37 |
| California | 95.7 | 4.3 | 23 |
| Colorado | 100.0 | 0.0 | 30 |
| Florida | 100.0 | 0.0 | 26 |
| Georgia | 94.4 | 5.6 | 54 |
| Iowa | 97.5 | 2.5 | 80 |
| Idaho | 100.0 | 0.0 | 23 |
| Illinois | 98.7 | 1.3 | 76 |
| Indiana | 96.4 | 3.6 | 55 |
| Kansas | 98.8 | 1.2 | 85 |
| Kentucky | 100.0 | 0.0 | 52 |
| Louisiana | 100.0 | 0.0 | 43 |
| Maryland | 100.0 | 0.0 | 13 |
| Michigan | 97.8 | 2.2 | 45 |
| Minnesota | 97.1 | 2.9 | 68 |
| Missouri | 98.5 | 1.5 | 65 |
| Mississippi | 98.3 | 1.7 | 60 |
| Montana | 100.0 | 0.0 | 39 |
| North Carolina | 97.9 | 2.1 | 48 |
| North Dakota | 100.0 | 0.0 | 47 |
| Nebraska | 97.1 | 2.9 | 70 |
| New Mexico | 93.3 | 6.7 | 15 |
| New York | 92.3 | 7.7 | 39 |
| Ohio | 100.0 | 0.0 | 55 |
| Oklahoma | 100.0 | 0.0 | 54 |
| Oregon | 100.0 | 0.0 | 20 |
| Pennsylvania | 100.0 | 0.0 | 32 |
| South Carolina | 96.2 | 3.8 | 26 |
| South Dakota | 100.0 | 0.0 | 51 |
| Tennessee | 100.0 | 0.0 | 50 |
| Texas | 98.1 | 1.9 | 104 |
| Utah | 100.0 | 0.0 | 15 |
| Virginia | 92.1 | 7.9 | 38 |
| Washington | 100.0 | 0.0 | 23 |
| Wisconsin | 100.0 | 0.0 | 51 |
| West Virginia | 100.0 | 0.0 | 19 |
| States with fewer than 15 respondents | 98.4 | 1.6 | 61 |
| All States | 98.2 | 1.8 | 1,733 |