U.S. General Accounting Office
Survey on Food Security Act Conservation Compliance (GAO-03-492SP)
Q93. Please provide below any suggestions or comments you have to improve the way NRCS supports you in performing status reviews and ensuring compliance with highly erodible land and wetland conservation provision requirements.

  Wrote comment (percent) No comment (percent) Number of respondents
Alabama 48.0 52.0 50
Arkansas 42.2 57.8 45
California 54.5 45.5 33
Colorado 36.4 63.6 44
Florida 58.1 41.9 31
Georgia 39.3 60.7 61
Iowa 61.7 38.3 81
Idaho 60.7 39.3 28
Illinois 42.9 57.1 77
Indiana 44.4 55.6 63
Kansas 56.4 43.6 94
Kentucky 41.1 58.9 73
Louisiana 51.1 48.9 45
Maryland 53.3 46.7 15
Michigan 54.2 45.8 48
Minnesota 39.1 60.9 69
Missouri 33.8 66.3 80
Mississippi 36.4 63.6 66
Montana 55.6 44.4 45
North Carolina 45.8 54.2 72
North Dakota 52.0 48.0 50
Nebraska 52.1 47.9 73
New Mexico 58.3 41.7 24
New York 48.7 51.3 39
Ohio 49.2 50.8 61
Oklahoma 50.0 50.0 62
Oregon 47.6 52.4 21
Pennsylvania 37.5 62.5 40
South Carolina 27.6 72.4 29
South Dakota 63.0 37.0 54
Tennessee 36.4 63.6 55
Texas 48.4 51.6 157
Utah 60.0 40.0 15
Virginia 51.2 48.8 41
Washington 38.5 61.5 26
Wisconsin 73.1 26.9 52
West Virginia 26.1 73.9 23
States with fewer than 15 respondents 43.8 56.2 73
All States 47.6 52.4 2,015