Percent	Number of respondents
1. Easy to program into existing computer system	65.2	23
2. Decrease workload for workers (e.g., number of contacts with client, time spent on paperwork)	65.2	23
3. Simplify rules for workers (e.g., eligibility, benefit, and change reporting rules)	95.7	23
4. Simplify rules for clients (e.g., eligibility, benefit, and change reporting rules)	82.6	23
5. Increase in benefit amounts for clients	43.5	23
6. Decrease burden on clients (e.g., time spent applying or reporting changes, amount of paperwork)	69.6	23
7. Promote self-sufficiency among clients	26.1	23
8. Increase overall participation in program	39.1	23
9. Increase participation of working families	30.4	23
10. Increase participation of elderly and/or disabled	21.7	23
11. Increase application process timeliness (i.e., percent of applications processed within required time limits)	34.8	23
12. Works well with other Farm Bill options state chose to implement	60.9	23
13. Makes it easier to align food stamps with TANF	87.0	23
14. Makes it easier to align food stamps with Medicaid	60.9	23
15. Decrease error rate	65.2	23
16. Lower administrative costs	30.4	23
17. Other (Please describe below.)	0.0	23