Percent	Number of respondents
1. Easy to program into existing computer system	33.3	33
2. Decrease workload for workers (e.g., number of contacts with client, time spent on paperwork)	97.0	33
3. Simplify rules for workers (e.g., eligibility, benefit, and change reporting rules)	90.9	33
4. Simplify rules for clients (e.g., eligibility, benefit, and change reporting rules)	97.0	33
5. Increase in benefit amounts for clients	48.5	33
6. Decrease burden on clients (e.g., time spent applying or reporting changes, amount of paperwork)	100	33
7. Promote self-sufficiency among clients	36.4	33
8. Increase overall participation in program	66.7	33
9. Increase participation of working families	63.6	33
10. Increase participation of elderly and/or disabled	9.1	33
11. Increase application process timeliness (i.e., percent of applications processed within required time limits)	12.1	33
12. Works well with other Farm Bill options state chose to implement	42.4	33
13. Makes it easier to align food stamps with TANF	12.1	33
14. Makes it easier to align food stamps with Medicaid	6.1	33
15. Decrease error rate	90.9	33
16. Lower administrative costs	42.4	33
17. Other (Please describe below.)	3.0	33