Percent	Number of respondents
1. Easy to program into existing computer system	25.0	12
2. Decrease workload for workers (e.g., number of contacts with client, time spent on paperwork)	75.0	12
3. Simplify rules for workers (e.g., eligibility, benefit, and change reporting rules)	91.7	12
4. Simplify rules for clients (e.g., eligibility, benefit, and change reporting rules)	100	12
5. Increase in benefit amounts for clients	91.7	12
6. Decrease burden on clients (e.g., time spent applying or reporting changes, amount of paperwork)	91.7	12
7. Promote self-sufficiency among clients	83.3	12
8. Increase overall participation in program	75.0	12
9. Increase participation of working families	91.7	12
10. Increase participation of elderly and/or disabled	8.3	12
11. Increase application process timeliness (i.e., percent of applications processed within required time limits)	25.0	12
12. Works well with other Farm Bill options state chose to implement	58.3	12
13. Makes it easier to align food stamps with TANF	8.3	12
14. Makes it easier to align food stamps with Medicaid	0.0	12
15. Decrease error rate	83.3	12
16. Lower administrative costs	25.0	12
17. Other (Please describe below.)	8.3	12