Percent	Number of respondents
1. Easy to program into existing computer system	60.0	30
2. Decrease workload for workers (e.g., number of contacts with client, time spent on paperwork)	73.3	30
3. Simplify rules for workers (e.g., eligibility, benefit, and change reporting rules)	93.3	30
4. Simplify rules for clients (e.g., eligibility, benefit, and change reporting rules)	93.3	30
5. Increase in benefit amounts for clients	73.3	30
6. Decrease burden on clients (e.g., time spent applying or reporting changes, amount of paperwork)	50.0	30
7. Promote self-sufficiency among clients	13.3	30
8. Increase overall participation in program	30.0	30
9. Increase participation of working families	20.0	30
10. Increase participation of elderly and/or disabled	16.7	30
11. Increase application process timeliness (i.e., percent of applications processed within required time limits)	20.0	30
12. Works well with other Farm Bill options state chose to implement	26.7	30
13. Makes it easier to align food stamps with TANF	3.3	30
14. Makes it easier to align food stamps with Medicaid	0.0	30
15. Decrease error rate	90.0	30
16. Lower administrative costs	20.0	30
17. Other (Please describe below.)	13.3	30