| Return to Table of Contents |
Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities (10.760) obligations in South Dakota by county and program |
Dollars and shares using Dominant RUCA |
| County | Dominant RUCA Category | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) |
|---|---|---|
| Beadle County | Rural | 321,000 |
| Bon Homme County | Rural | 300,000 |
| Brown County | Rural | 3,261,000 |
| Brule County | Rural | 3,820,800 |
| Buffalo County | Rural | 984,000 |
| Charles Mix County | Rural | 2,893,000 |
| Clark County | Rural | 821,000 |
| Custer County | Rural | 3,550,303 |
| Davison County | Rural | 4,625,000 |
| Day County | Rural | 318,600 |
| Deuel County | Rural | 239,500 |
| Dewey County | Rural | 602,500 |
| Douglas County | Rural | 180,000 |
| Haakon County | Rural | 1,303,800 |
| Hamlin County | Rural | 1,773,500 |
| Jackson County | Rural | 62,180 |
| Jerauld County | Rural | 195,000 |
| Kingsbury County | Rural | 1,326,000 |
| Lawrence County | Rural | 370,000 |
| Lincoln County | Urban | 400,000 |
| Marshall County | Rural | 7,025,386 |
| Moody County | Rural | 226,000 |
| Pennington County | Urban | 3,612,548 |
| Roberts County | Rural | 144,940 |
| Sanborn County | Rural | 49,500 |
| Spink County | Rural | 511,750 |
| Todd County | Rural | 630,000 |
| Tripp County | Rural | 1,000,000 |
| Union County | Urban | 799,000 |
| For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported." |
| (GAO-06-294) |