| Return to Table of Contents |
Intermediary Re-lending Program (10.767) |
Dollars and shares using Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Urban | Rural | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | Percent of Total | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | Percent of Total | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | |
| Alaska | 750,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 750,000 |
| Arizona | 1,900,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 1,900,000 |
| Arkansas | 750,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 750,000 |
| California | 4,000,000 | 88.9 | 500,000 | 11.1 | 4,500,000 |
| Colorado | 0 | 0 | 500,000 | 100.0 | 500,000 |
| District Of Columbia | 750,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 750,000 |
| Georgia | 2,250,000 | 60.0 | 1,500,000 | 40.0 | 3,750,000 |
| Hawaii | 500,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 500,000 |
| Idaho | 650,000 | 46.4 | 750,000 | 53.6 | 1,400,000 |
| Illinois | 0 | 0 | 2,275,000 | 100.0 | 2,275,000 |
| Iowa | 1,550,000 | 68.9 | 700,000 | 31.1 | 2,250,000 |
| Kentucky | 1,250,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 1,250,000 |
| Louisiana | 750,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 750,000 |
| Maine | 0 | 0 | 2,500,000 | 100.0 | 2,500,000 |
| Maryland | 1,500,000 | 54.5 | 1,250,000 | 45.5 | 2,750,000 |
| Massachusetts | 1,500,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 1,500,000 |
| Michigan | 1,350,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 1,350,000 |
| Minnesota | 1,250,000 | 50.8 | 1,212,207 | 49.2 | 2,462,207 |
| Mississippi | 750,000 | 50.0 | 750,000 | 50.0 | 1,500,000 |
| Missouri | 0 | 0 | 500,000 | 100.0 | 500,000 |
| Montana | 5,467,000 | 81.4 | 1,250,000 | 18.6 | 6,717,000 |
| Nebraska | 1,900,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 1,900,000 |
| Nevada | 0 | 0 | 1,250,000 | 100.0 | 1,250,000 |
| New Hampshire | 2,250,000 | 64.3 | 1,250,000 | 35.7 | 3,500,000 |
| New Jersey | 800,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 800,000 |
| New Mexico | 991,971 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 991,971 |
| New York | 750,000 | 71.4 | 300,000 | 28.6 | 1,050,000 |
| North Carolina | 9,017,980 | 85.7 | 1,500,000 | 14.3 | 10,517,980 |
| North Dakota | 1,000,000 | 80.0 | 250,000 | 20.0 | 1,250,000 |
| Ohio | 3,750,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 3,750,000 |
| Oklahoma | 1,500,000 | 42.9 | 2,000,000 | 57.1 | 3,500,000 |
| Oregon | 2,150,000 | 65.0 | 1,160,000 | 35.0 | 3,310,000 |
| Pennsylvania | 1,745,000 | 58.3 | 1,250,000 | 41.7 | 2,995,000 |
| South Carolina | 2,000,000 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 2,000,000 |
| South Dakota | 2,750,000 | 29.3 | 6,650,000 | 70.7 | 9,400,000 |
| Tennessee | 750,000 | 33.3 | 1,500,000 | 66.7 | 2,250,000 |
| Texas | 4,630,283 | 75.5 | 1,500,000 | 24.5 | 6,130,283 |
| Utah | 750,000 | 30.0 | 1,750,000 | 70.0 | 2,500,000 |
| Vermont | 1,845,000 | 59.6 | 1,250,000 | 40.4 | 3,095,000 |
| Virginia | 0 | 0 | 150,000 | 100.0 | 150,000 |
| Washington | 2,250,000 | 75.0 | 750,000 | 25.0 | 3,000,000 |
| West Virginia | 1,931,510 | 54.3 | 1,625,000 | 45.7 | 3,556,510 |
| Wisconsin | 0 | 0 | 750,000 | 100.0 | 750,000 |
| Wyoming | 495,000 | 39.8 | 750,000 | 60.2 | 1,245,000 |
| Total | 70,173,744 | 64.1 | 39,322,207 | 35.9 | 109,495,951 |
| For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported." |
| (GAO-06-294) |