| Return to Table of Contents |
Rural Business Enterprise Grants (10.769) obligations in Michigan by county and program |
Dollars and shares using Dominant RUCA |
| County | Dominant RUCA Category | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpena County | Rural | 56,000 |
| Antrim County | Rural | 142,460 |
| Baraga County | Rural | 50,000 |
| Barry County | Urban | 50,000 |
| Berrien County | Urban | 219,500 |
| Charlevoix County | Rural | 50,000 |
| Eaton County | Urban | 302,100 |
| Grand Traverse County | Rural | 25,000 |
| Houghton County | Rural | 65,000 |
| Huron County | Rural | 423,700 |
| Ingham County | Urban | 315,000 |
| Iosco County | Rural | 93,000 |
| Iron County | Rural | 124,240 |
| Jackson County | Urban | 1,000,000 |
| Kalkaska County | Rural | 40,000 |
| Marquette County | Rural | 110,000 |
| Menominee County | Rural | 60,000 |
| Montcalm County | Rural | 99,900 |
| Muskegon County | Urban | 30,000 |
| Newaygo County | Urban | 80,000 |
| Oceana County | Rural | 283,700 |
| Ontonagon County | Rural | 56,000 |
| Oscoda County | Rural | 211,900 |
| Otsego County | Rural | 120,000 |
| Roscommon County | Rural | 75,000 |
| Saginaw County | Urban | 165,000 |
| Shiawassee County | Urban | 189,900 |
| St. Clair County | Urban | 40,000 |
| Van Buren County | Urban | 99,000 |
| For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported." |
| (GAO-06-294) |