| Return to Table of Contents |
Rural Electrification Loans and Loan Guarantees (10.850) obligations in Texas by county and program |
Dollars and shares using Dominant RUCA |
| County | Dominant RUCA Category | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) |
|---|---|---|
| Bailey County | Rural | 3,247,000 |
| Bell County | Urban | 8,880,600 |
| Cass County | Rural | 12,000,000 |
| Comanche County | Rural | 8,455,000 |
| Falls County | Rural | 2,452,000 |
| Floyd County | Rural | 9,142,000 |
| Gillespie County | Rural | 9,000,000 |
| Gregg County | Urban | 86,264,000 |
| Hamilton County | Rural | 9,222,000 |
| Johnson County | Urban | 72,000,000 |
| Karnes County | Rural | 12,000,000 |
| Lamb County | Rural | 9,826,000 |
| McLennan County | Urban | 546,583,000 |
| Medina County | Urban | 15,199,000 |
| Nacogdoches County | Rural | 320,921,000 |
| Ochiltree County | Rural | 6,694,000 |
| San Augustine County | Rural | 26,048,000 |
| Victoria County | Urban | 140,000,000 |
| Wood County | Rural | 12,034,000 |
| For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported." |
| (GAO-06-294) |