| Return to Table of Contents |
Program-level data |
Below are links to various views of the program information. Clicking on a link beside the state name will open a table of that state's county-level program data. |
| Analysis by | ||
|---|---|---|
| California | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Connecticut | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Florida | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Indiana | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Massachusetts | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Minnesota | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Missouri | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| New Jersey | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Ohio | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| South Carolina | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Tennessee | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Texas | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Virginia | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| West Virginia | Dominant RUCA | Rural-Urban Continuum |
| For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported." |
| (GAO-06-294) |