Return to Table of Contents
 
Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Programs on Indian Lands (15.039)
Dollars and shares using Rural-Urban Continuum

  Rural Urban Total
Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) Percent of Total Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) Percent of Total Total Obligations (FY2002-2004)
Alabama 94,336 100.0 0 0 94,336
Alaska 100,722 8.8 1,048,400 91.2 1,149,122
Arizona 1,624,352 42.6 2,185,558 57.4 3,809,910
California 0 0 780,946 100.0 780,946
Colorado 320,000 24.7 977,000 75.3 1,297,000
Idaho 0 0 2,579,376 100.0 2,579,376
Maine 100,695 100.0 0 0 100,695
Michigan 2,564,446 55.3 2,077,000 44.7 4,641,446
Minnesota 718,000 38.1 1,168,800 61.9 1,886,800
Mississippi 141,654 100.0 0 0 141,654
Montana 2,186,781 100.0 0 0 2,186,781
Nebraska 357,859 100.0 0 0 357,859
Nevada 572,984 98.5 8,637 1.5 581,621
New Mexico 1,160,455 57.0 874,625 43.0 2,035,080
North Carolina 335,684 100.0 0 0 335,684
North Dakota 1,070,609 100.0 0 0 1,070,609
Oklahoma 143,940 65.1 77,000 34.9 220,940
Oregon 1,408,992 6.9 19,148,486 93.1 20,557,478
Rhode Island 0 0 158,436 100.0 158,436
South Dakota 1,932,981 100.0 0 0 1,932,981
Utah 120,000 100.0 0 0 120,000
Washington 5,807,554 16.8 28,763,657 83.2 34,571,211
Wisconsin 17,449,499 100.0 0 0 17,449,499
Wyoming 329,240 100.0 0 0 329,240
Total 38,540,783 39.2 59,847,921 60.8 98,388,704

For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported."
(GAO-06-294)