| Return to Table of Contents |
Small Business Loans (59.012) obligations in South Carolina by county and program |
Dollars and shares using Dominant RUCA |
| County | Dominant RUCA Category | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) |
|---|---|---|
| Abbeville County | Rural | 696,250 |
| Aiken County | Urban | 6,228,115 |
| Allendale County | Rural | 127,500 |
| Anderson County | Urban | 7,320,760 |
| Bamberg County | Rural | 152,500 |
| Barnwell County | Rural | 850,500 |
| Beaufort County | Rural | 14,716,783 |
| Berkeley County | Urban | 15,868,171 |
| Calhoun County | Urban | 15,500 |
| Charleston County | Urban | 12,402,872 |
| Cherokee County | Rural | 5,401,062 |
| Chester County | Rural | 1,591,400 |
| Chesterfield County | Rural | 3,053,301 |
| Clarendon County | Rural | 1,377,895 |
| Colleton County | Rural | 2,246,175 |
| Darlington County | Urban | 1,885,950 |
| Dillon County | Rural | 649,000 |
| Dorchester County | Urban | 2,638,295 |
| Edgefield County | Rural | 1,005,600 |
| Fairfield County | Urban | 1,340,245 |
| Florence County | Urban | 6,125,184 |
| Georgetown County | Rural | 4,887,925 |
| Greenville County | Urban | 14,927,492 |
| Greenwood County | Rural | 3,810,099 |
| Hampton County | Rural | 1,822,625 |
| Horry County | Urban | 19,026,419 |
| Jasper County | Rural | 2,423,750 |
| Kershaw County | Rural | 2,187,975 |
| Lancaster County | Rural | 599,540 |
| Laurens County | Rural | 224,000 |
| Lexington County | Urban | 14,859,958 |
| Marion County | Rural | 732,500 |
| Marlboro County | Rural | 318,625 |
| Newberry County | Rural | 169,040 |
| Oconee County | Rural | 1,724,350 |
| Orangeburg County | Rural | 5,750,191 |
| Pickens County | Urban | 3,047,040 |
| Richland County | Urban | 16,997,316 |
| Saluda County | Rural | 696,090 |
| Spartanburg County | Urban | 8,487,505 |
| Sumter County | Urban | 2,511,050 |
| Union County | Rural | 1,272,250 |
| Williamsburg County | Rural | 30,000 |
| York County | Urban | 9,995,700 |
| For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported." |
| (GAO-06-294) |