| Return to Table of Contents |
Delta Area Economic Development (90.201) |
Dollars and shares using Dominant RUCA |
| Rural | Urban | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | Percent of Total | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | Percent of Total | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | |
| Alabama | 2,940,985 | 77.6 | 847,750 | 22.4 | 3,788,735 |
| Arkansas | 4,350,163 | 72.3 | 1,663,507 | 27.7 | 6,013,670 |
| Illinois | 3,307,101 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 3,307,101 |
| Kentucky | 3,460,596 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 3,460,596 |
| Louisiana | 2,932,323 | 41.7 | 4,100,154 | 58.3 | 7,032,477 |
| Mississippi | 4,033,571 | 77.1 | 1,197,306 | 22.9 | 5,230,877 |
| Missouri | 4,292,214 | 98.8 | 50,000 | 1.2 | 4,342,214 |
| Tennessee | 3,271,235 | 78.2 | 910,058 | 21.8 | 4,181,293 |
| Total | 28,588,188 | 76.5 | 8,768,775 | 23.5 | 37,356,963 |
| For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported." |
| (GAO-06-294) |