| Return to Table of Contents |
Delta Area Economic Development (90.201) |
Dollars and shares using Rural-Urban Continuum |
| Rural | Urban | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | Percent of Total | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | Percent of Total | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | |
| Alabama | 2,699,109 | 71.2 | 1,089,626 | 28.8 | 3,788,735 |
| Arkansas | 3,027,666 | 50.3 | 2,986,004 | 49.7 | 6,013,670 |
| Illinois | 2,697,898 | 81.6 | 609,203 | 18.4 | 3,307,101 |
| Kentucky | 200,000 | 5.8 | 3,260,596 | 94.2 | 3,460,596 |
| Louisiana | 1,992,292 | 28.3 | 5,040,185 | 71.7 | 7,032,477 |
| Mississippi | 1,857,952 | 35.5 | 3,372,925 | 64.5 | 5,230,877 |
| Missouri | 2,793,964 | 64.3 | 1,548,250 | 35.7 | 4,342,214 |
| Tennessee | 3,112,362 | 74.4 | 1,068,931 | 25.6 | 4,181,293 |
| Total | 18,381,243 | 49.2 | 18,975,720 | 50.8 | 37,356,963 |
| For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported." |
| (GAO-06-294) |