| Return to Table of Contents |
National Forest/Dependent Rural Communities (10.670) |
Dollars and shares using Dominant RUCA |
| Urban | Rural | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | Percent of Total | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | Percent of Total | Total Obligations (FY2002-2004) | |
| Arizona | 59,965 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 59,965 |
| Illinois | 0 | 0 | 160,000 | 100.0 | 160,000 |
| Maine | 0 | 0 | 10,000 | 100.0 | 10,000 |
| Michigan | 0 | 0 | 48,000 | 100.0 | 48,000 |
| Minnesota | 25,000 | 28.3 | 63,400 | 71.7 | 88,400 |
| Missouri | 0 | 0 | 49,000 | 100.0 | 49,000 |
| New Hampshire | 0 | 0 | 59,340 | 100.0 | 59,340 |
| Ohio | 0 | 0 | 33,000 | 100.0 | 33,000 |
| Pennsylvania | 0 | 0 | 98,000 | 100.0 | 98,000 |
| Tennessee | 0 | 0 | 190,000 | 100.0 | 190,000 |
| Vermont | 0 | 0 | 68,000 | 100.0 | 68,000 |
| Wisconsin | 0 | 0 | 134,339 | 100.0 | 134,339 |
| Total | 84,965 | 8.5 | 913,079 | 91.5 | 998,044 |
| For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported." |
| (GAO-06-294) |