10.	The federal Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) Section 313 establishes a federal toxic release reporting program and requires that certain facilities report their releases to EPA and their state government. EPCRA leaves each state free to enact its own TRI-like requirements. Has [name of state] enacted its own toxic release reporting statute?
	(Select one answer.)
	1.	Yes
	2.	No (Click here to skip to question 13.)
	3.	Uncertain

11.	Does the [name of state] statute have toxic release reporting requirements that exceed federal EPCRA Section 313 requirements?
	(Select one answer.)
	1.	Yes
	2.	No (Click here to skip to question 13.)
	3.	Uncertain

12.	Do the [name of state] reporting requirements exceed federal EPCRA Section 313 requirements in any of the following ways?
	*(Select one answer for each item listed below.)*

		Yes	No	Uncertain
12a.	Additional chemicals
12b.	Additional industry codes (SIC or NAICS)
12c.	Smaller release threshold
12d.	Smaller "manufacture, process, or otherwise use" thresholds
12e.	Lower employee threshold
12f.	Report the number of employees
12g.	Peak release data
12h.	Materials accounting (throughput) data
12i.	Pollution prevention efforts
12j.	Other (Please describe below).

	If 'yes' to 'Other,' what other additional data does [name of state] require facilities to report that is not required by EPCRA Section 313?