Q1. Did [name of state] use TRI data to do the following activities during calendar year 2006? |
| Yes | No | Uncertain | Number of respondents |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a. Evaluate facility emergency preparedness plans | 9 | 33 | 8 | 50 |
| b. Monitor facility pollution prevention efforts | 26 | 19 | 5 | 50 |
| c. Evaluate facility compliance with state pollution permits | 19 | 20 | 11 | 50 |
| d. Establish state permit limits | 3 | 30 | 16 | 49 |
| e. Compare state TRI data with other databases | 31 | 12 | 7 | 50 |
| f. Monitor facility performance in a pollution reduction program | 20 | 21 | 9 | 50 |
| g. Identify facilities that must comply with state environmental regulations | 18 | 21 | 11 | 50 |
| h. Target facilities for state TRI inspections | 7 | 37 | 6 | 50 |
| i. Target facilities for other state environmental inspections | 17 | 22 | 11 | 50 |
| j. Identify the location of chemical hazards | 21 | 18 | 11 | 50 |
| k. Identify the location of health risks | 17 | 23 | 9 | 49 |
| l. Make environmental justice assessments | 7 | 23 | 19 | 49 |
| m. Integrate TRI data with GIS or other state mapping capabilities | 14 | 23 | 12 | 49 |
| n. Publicly recognize facilities that reduce pollution | 12 | 26 | 11 | 49 |
| o. Reconcile EPA TRI dataset with your state's TRI dataset | 24 | 24 | 2 | 50 |
| p. Respond to data requests from other programs | 35 | 14 | 1 | 50 |
| q. Respond to data requests from the public (including citizens, non-profits, localities, academic researchers) | 38 | 12 | 0 | 50 |
| r. Other (Please describe below). | 5 | 24 | 4 | 33 |