49.
|
Since 2000, as a result of regulatory examinations, has your financial institution ever received a violation or been fined in relation to your CTR exemption process? | ||
1. | |||
2. | (Click to go to Question 52.) | ||
3. | (Click to go to Question 52.) |
50.
|
To what extent, if at all, have the results of those examinations increased or decreased your use of the Phase I exemption process? | ||
1. | |||
2. | |||
3. | |||
4. | |||
5. | |||
6. |
51.
|
To what extent, if at all, have the results of those examinations increased or decreased your use of the Phase II exemption process? | ||
1. | |||
2. | |||
3. | |||
4. | |||
5. | |||
6. |
52.
|
How much, if at all, would clearer guidance from examiners on the level of documentation required to support exemptions reduce any burden that may be associated with filing these exemptions without increasing the risk that money laundering or other illegal activities would be less easily detected? | ||
1. | |||
2. | |||
3. | |||
4. | |||
5. |
53.
|
Do you have any comments you would like to make about this or other potential changes to the CTR exemption process? |
Full Report: GAO-08-355 | Table of Contents | Previous | Next |