Section I (Continued) -
Developing Performance Tracking Systems

26.	How involved, if at all, has your state education agency been in developing a data system for tracking the performance of PK-12 teachers after they enter the teaching field?
	1.		Very greatly involved - Continue.
	2.		Greatly involved - Continue.
	3.		Moderately involved - Continue.
	4.		Somewhat involved - Continue.
	5.		Not involved (Click here to skip to question 29.)
	6.		Not applicable/Do not know (Click here to skip to question 29.)

27.	Which of the following offices, agencies, and institutions has your state education agency collaborated with in developing a data system for tracking the performance of PK-12 teachers after they enter the teaching field? (Select all that apply.)
	1.		State agency for higher education (SAHE)
	2.		Governor’s Office
	3.		Legislative committees
	4.		Professional standards board
	5.		Public school districts
	6.		Public schools
	7.		Public school associations (e.g., PTAs, PTOs, etc.)
	8.		Teacher unions or associations
	9.		Colleges/universities
	10.		Businesses
	11.		Civic or community organizations
	12.		Other - Please specify below.
	13.		None of the above (did not collaborate)

	Please specify other entities here.

28.	Currently, what level of progress, if any, has been made in developing a data system for tracking the performance of PK-12 teachers after they enter the teaching field?
	1.		Completed
	2.		High level of progress
	3.		Moderate level of progress
	4.		Low level of progress
	5.		Very low level or no progress
	6.		Not applicable/Do not know

---

Full Report: GAO-09-593

Table of Contents | Previous | Next