| 50. During the draft survey review process, how frequently do the following issues influence decisions about whether a deficiency should be changed or deleted? |
| Always (percent) |
Frequently (percent) |
Sometimes (percent) |
Infrequently (percent) |
Never (percent) |
Not sure/no opinion (percent) |
Non response (percent) |
Non response due to skip pattern (percent) |
Number of respondents |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a. Quality of the writing used to cite the deficiency | 6.0 | 12.0 | 46.0 | 28.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 50 |
| b. Insufficient documentation of evidence for the cited deficiency | 18.0 | 22.0 | 50.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 50 |
| c. Reluctance to cite serious deficiencies because of workload burden (e.g., revisits, paperwork) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 22.0 | 76.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 50 |
| d. Consequence of a double G citation | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 14.0 | 82.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 50 |
| e. Likelihood of the deficiency holding up in the IDR process | 2.0 | 6.0 | 16.0 | 26.0 | 48.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 50 |
| f. Likelihood of the deficiency holding up when reviewed by the CMS regional office | 2.0 | 2.0 | 14.0 | 30.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 50 |
| g. Other | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 10.0 | 76.0 | 2.0 | 50 |