Q23. How satisfied or dissatisfied is your state DOT with FHWA's and FTA's roles in the statewide planning process? |
| Very satisfied | Satisfied | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | Dissatisfied | Very dissatisfied | No basis to judge | Don't know | Number of respondents |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a. Participation of FHWA division office personnel in statewide planning process | 19 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 |
| b. Participation of FTA regional office personnel in statewide planning process | 6 | 17 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 52 |
| c. Quality of FHWA technical support | 14 | 29 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50 |
| d. Quality of FTA technical support | 8 | 17 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 52 |
| e. Joint FHWA/FTA determination of fiscal constraint of STIP | 9 | 26 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 51 |
| f. Usefulness of joint FHWA/FTA planning findings from STIP reviews to improve statewide planning activities | 7 | 25 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 52 |
| g. Joint FHWA/FTA compliance review of statewide planning regulations | 7 | 26 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 51 |
| h. Other | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 12 |