Survey of United States Government Representatives in Feed the Future Countries

U.S. Government Accountability Office

Contents

(Return to main page)

Introduction

The U.S. Congress has asked the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review the U.S. government's Feed the Future (FtF) Initiative. As part of this review, GAO is sending this questionnaire to all key government representatives of various U.S. agencies who are providing support to FtF-related activities and projects in the 19 FtF countries. Please answer the questions based on your individual experience and point of view based on your tenure in _____, not based on the entire FtF program at your agency or mission. Answering these questions will help us inform Congress about this important issue.

Responding to these questions should take about an hour and can be completed over multiple sittings. Your responses can be saved and accessed at a later date. To learn more about completing the questionnaire, printing your responses, and whom to contact if you have questions, _____. If you are unsure of how to respond to a question, please contact us for assistance. Important definitions used throughout the survey can also be found _____.

We will not release outside of GAO any individually identifiable data obtained from responding to this questionnaire, unless required by law or requested by a member of Congress. We will generally report the summary results of this survey. If we incorporate examples of individual survey responses into the report, we will do so in a manner that prevents the identification of the respondents.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

NOTE: Acronyms stated in some questions' results are spelled out in the full survey question, which can be viewed by clicking on the View Question link.

(View question)

Section 1: Your Feed the Future responsibilities

1. What is your title?

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


2. What is your employment status?

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Foreign Service Officer (direct hire) 62.0 55.4-68.5
Foreign Service Limited 2.1 0.2-3.9
Personal Services Contractor 6.2 3.1-9.3
Foreign Service National / Locally Employed Staff 2.7 0.3-5.1
Appointment Eligible Family Member 1.0 0.0-2.3
Other (please specify in 2a below): 23.7 18.1-29.3
Not checked 2.4 0.3-4.5

2a. If other employment status, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


3. What are your major FtF-related duties in _____? Please limit your response to 1,000 characters.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


4. In which focus area(s) are the FtF-related activities you are planning or implementing in _____ (e.g., inclusive agriculture sector growth, improved nutrition, private sector engagement, research & capacity building, gender integration, environment-sensitive development)? Please limit your response to 1,000 characters.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


5. How many months have you been planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Less than 3 months 7.9 4.2-11.5
3 to 6 months 19.4 13.9-25.0
7 to 12 months 18.6 13.3-24.0
13 to 18 months 19.5 14.1-25.0
19 to 24 months 11.6 7.4-15.7
More than 24 months 15.8 11.0-20.7
Not checked 7.2 3.6-10.8

6. During the past 6 months (or during your tenure, if less than 6 months), approximately what proportion of your time have you spent planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Most of my time 8.7 5.1-12.2
About half of my time 3.5 1.3-5.8
Some of my time 44.3 37.5-51.1
Very little of my time 41.5 34.7-48.2
Not checked 2.1 0.2-3.9

7. Are you considered a regional employee?

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes 13.3 9.3-17.3
No 86.7 82.7-90.7

8. In which of the following FtF countries do you currently plan or implement FtF-related activities?

(View question)

1. Bangladesh

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 16.5 4.3-28.7
Not checked 83.5 71.3-95.7

2. Cambodia

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 13.2 1.1-25.3
Not checked 86.8 74.7-98.9

3. Nepal

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 5.5 0.0-12.9
Not checked 94.5 87.1-100

4. Tajikistan

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Not checked 100.0 100-100

5. Guatemala

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 11.0 0.7-21.2
Not checked 89.0 78.8-99.3

6. Haiti

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 5.5 0.0-12.9
Not checked 94.5 87.1-100

7. Honduras

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 11.0 0.7-21.2
Not checked 89.0 78.8-99.3

8. Ethiopia

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 5.5 0.0-12.9
Not checked 94.5 87.1-100

9. Kenya

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 18.7 5.1-32.3
Not checked 81.3 67.7-94.9

10. Malawi

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 5.5 0.0-12.9
Not checked 94.5 87.1-100

11. Rwanda

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 11.0 0.7-21.2
Not checked 89.0 78.8-99.3

12. Tanzania

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 11.0 0.7-21.2
Not checked 89.0 78.8-99.3

13. Uganda

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 18.7 5.1-32.3
Not checked 81.3 67.7-94.9

14. Zambia

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 11.0 0.7-21.2
Not checked 89.0 78.8-99.3

15. Mozambique

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 16.5 4.3-28.7
Not checked 83.5 71.3-95.7

16. Ghana

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 13.2 1.1-25.3
Not checked 86.8 74.7-98.9

17. Liberia

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 13.2 1.1-25.3
Not checked 86.8 74.7-98.9

18. Mali

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 13.2 1.1-25.3
Not checked 86.8 74.7-98.9

19. Senegal

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Checked 13.2 1.1-25.3
Not checked 86.8 74.7-98.9

Section 2: Field-based coordination with in-country representatives from your agency or other U.S. government agencies

2A. Coordination with in-country USAID representatives

9. Do you coordinate with any in-country USAID representatives in planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

Coordination refers to any joint action by two or more individuals, groups, or organizations (participants) that is intended to produce more public value than could be produced when one individual, group or organization acted alone. Coordination entails (1) repeated contacts with other participants, rather than one-time interactions; (2) a balanced exchange of substantive information among participants; and (3) participants taking meaningful actions in response to information received from other participants.

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes, I coordinate with USAID representatives. 93.2 89.7-96.6
No, I do not coordinate with USAID representatives. 6.8 3.4-10.3

10. Which of the following USAID representatives have you coordinated with to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Coordination with USAID Mission Director

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 77.9 72.0-83.7
Do not coordinate with 8.6 4.8-12.4
Not applicable 3.3 0.9-5.7
Not checked 10.2 5.9-14.6

Coordination with USAID agricultural staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 90.1 85.8-94.4
Not applicable 5.9 2.6-9.1
Not checked 4.0 1.1-6.9

Coordination with USAID private sector/economic development staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 80.9 75.4-86.3
Do not coordinate with 5.6 2.4-8.7
Not applicable 7.0 3.5-10.5
Not checked 6.6 3.3-10.0

Coordination with USAID health or nutrition staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 63.0 56.2-69.8
Do not coordinate with 17.1 11.8-22.4
Not applicable 3.3 0.9-5.7
Not checked 16.6 11.3-21.8

Coordination with USAID food aid/Title II staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 40.5 33.5-47.4
Do not coordinate with 17.0 11.8-22.2
Not applicable 22.7 16.7-28.7
Not checked 19.8 14.1-25.5

Coordination with USAID democracy and governance staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 38.5 31.5-45.5
Do not coordinate with 27.1 20.9-33.3
Not applicable 10.7 6.6-14.8
Not checked 23.7 17.8-29.6

Coordination with USAID regional mission staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 37.9 31.0-44.7
Do not coordinate with 23.8 17.6-30.0
Not applicable 18.0 12.6-23.4
Not checked 20.3 14.8-25.9

Coordination with other USAID staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 16.6 11.3-21.8
Do not coordinate with 14.4 9.4-19.4
Not applicable 22.1 16.2-28.1
Not checked 46.9 39.8-54.0

10a. If other USAID staff, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


11. About how often have you participated in each of the following with those USAID representatives to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Food security or FtF working group meetings with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 0.8 0.0-1.8
Monthly 30.5 24.0-37.1
Quarterly 46.6 39.5-53.7
Yearly 5.6 2.4-8.8
Less than once per year 5.5 2.1-8.9
Not at all 8.1 4.3-11.8
Not checked 2.9 0.3-5.5

Joint meetings with host country government officials with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 8.5 4.5-12.4
Quarterly 33.3 26.6-40.0
Yearly 8.8 4.7-12.9
Less than once per year 9.6 5.7-13.6
Not at all 34.6 27.9-41.4
Not checked 5.1 1.9-8.3

Joint meetings with other stakeholders with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.9 0.2-3.6
Monthly 13.7 8.9-18.6
Quarterly 28.2 21.9-34.4
Yearly 15.1 9.9-20.3
Less than once per year 5.9 2.6-9.2
Not at all 28.6 22.2-35.1
Not checked 6.6 2.9-10.2

Joint visits to FtF project sites in country with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 5.1 1.9-8.3
Quarterly 23.0 16.9-29.0
Yearly 9.7 5.7-13.7
Less than once per year 8.2 4.6-11.9
Not at all 46.7 39.6-53.7
Not checked 7.3 3.6-11.0

Joint attendance at regional or in-country conferences or workshops with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 3.7 1.0-6.3
Quarterly 17.9 12.5-23.3
Yearly 18.2 12.8-23.5
Less than once per year 13.2 8.4-18.0
Not at all 40.8 33.8-47.8
Not checked 6.2 2.8-9.7

Other activity with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 2.6 0.3-4.9
Monthly 5.1 1.9-8.3
Quarterly 3.3 0.9-5.7
Yearly 1.5 0.0-3.3
Not at all 25.1 19.0-31.3
Not checked 62.4 55.5-69.3

11a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


12. In your view, how effective, if at all, has your coordination with those USAID representatives been in accomplishing each of the following actions related to FtF planning or implementation in _____?

(View question)

Developing or contributing to integrated FTF program documents with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 43.4 36.4-50.5
Somewhat effective 40.2 33.3-47.2
Not effective 3.8 1.4-6.2
Has not occurred 10.0 5.9-14.1
Not checked 2.6 0.3-4.9

Integrating FtF program or project planning with other US foreign assistance programs with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 41.5 34.4-48.5
Somewhat effective 39.0 32.1-45.8
Not effective 5.9 2.6-9.2
Has not occurred 11.1 6.8-15.4
Not checked 2.6 0.3-4.9

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with host government officials with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 30.8 24.2-37.5
Somewhat effective 34.3 27.6-41.0
Not effective 4.1 1.5-6.8
Has not occurred 25.6 19.5-31.7
Not checked 5.1 1.9-8.3

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with other stakeholders with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 29.0 22.5-35.5
Somewhat effective 44.1 37.1-51.1
Not effective 7.5 3.9-11.1
Has not occurred 16.9 11.4-22.3
Not checked 2.6 0.3-4.9

Making progress on needed policy reforms in host country with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 11.7 7.0-16.5
Somewhat effective 39.5 32.5-46.4
Not effective 15.6 10.6-20.7
Has not occurred 25.8 19.6-32.0
Not checked 7.3 3.6-11.0

Identifying donors or partners with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 28.7 22.2-35.1
Somewhat effective 40.7 33.8-47.6
Not effective 5.7 2.7-8.7
Has not occurred 20.1 14.2-26.0
Not checked 4.8 1.8-7.8

Developing joint or compatible procedures or processes for FtF activities with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 25.7 19.4-32.0
Somewhat effective 42.2 35.3-49.2
Not effective 5.2 2.2-8.2
Has not occurred 20.6 14.9-26.4
Not checked 6.2 2.8-9.7

Developing joint communication plans, reports and/or and cables with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 28.7 22.1-35.2
Somewhat effective 33.9 27.2-40.7
Not effective 6.1 3.2-9.1
Has not occurred 24.3 18.3-30.3
Not checked 7.0 3.5-10.5

Other action with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 2.2 0.2-4.2
Not effective 1.1 0.0-2.5
Has not occurred 20.3 14.6-26.0
Not checked 76.4 70.4-82.4

12a. If other action, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


13. As a result of the coordination efforts with those USAID representatives, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Complexity of planning for FtF projects or activities with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 25.8 19.5-32.0
Remained about the same 30.4 23.9-36.9
Decreased 5.6 2.4-8.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 34.2 27.5-40.9
Not checked 4.0 1.1-6.9

Speed of planning for FtF projects or activities with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 26.9 20.7-33.2
Remained about the same 30.4 23.9-37.0
Decreased 3.3 0.9-5.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 33.8 27.1-40.5
Not checked 5.5 2.1-8.9

Budgeting or funding amount for FtF projects or activities with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 17.6 12.1-23.1
Remained about the same 26.5 20.3-32.7
Decreased 2.6 0.3-4.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 46.7 39.7-53.8
Not checked 6.6 2.9-10.2

Consistency of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 14.0 8.9-19.0
Remained about the same 26.1 19.9-32.3
Decreased 3.0 0.8-5.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 51.9 44.8-58.9
Not checked 5.1 1.9-8.3

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 9.6 5.4-13.7
Remained about the same 27.2 20.9-33.4
Decreased 3.3 0.9-5.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 53.4 46.3-60.4
Not checked 6.6 2.9-10.2

Speed of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 10.2 5.9-14.6
Remained about the same 26.1 19.9-32.3
Decreased 3.7 1.0-6.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 54.9 47.8-61.9
Not checked 5.1 1.9-8.3

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 16.6 11.3-21.9
Remained about the same 24.6 18.6-30.7
Decreased 6.7 3.3-10.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 44.1 37.0-51.1
Not checked 8.0 4.0-12.1

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 18.0 12.6-23.5
Remained about the same 23.9 17.9-29.9
Decreased 3.0 0.8-5.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 48.5 41.4-55.6
Not checked 6.6 2.9-10.2

Efficiency with which you are able to carry out your FtF duties with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 24.7 18.5-30.8
Remained about the same 30.9 24.4-37.4
Decreased 1.9 0.2-3.6
Don't know/ too soon to tell 34.9 28.1-41.6
Not checked 7.7 3.8-11.5

Your FtF-related knowledge and expertise with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 69.7 63.2-76.2
Remained about the same 12.8 8.2-17.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 11.0 6.6-15.4
Not checked 6.6 2.9-10.2

Clarity of roles and responsibilities between you and USAID representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 48.5 41.5-55.6
Remained about the same 29.1 22.7-35.4
Decreased 2.2 0.2-4.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 14.7 9.6-19.7
Not checked 5.5 2.1-8.9

Mutual respect in working relationships with USAID representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 56.0 49.0-63.0
Remained about the same 27.1 20.9-33.3
Decreased 1.9 0.2-3.6
Don't know/ too soon to tell 9.5 5.4-13.7
Not checked 5.5 2.1-8.9

Other feature with USAID

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 1.5 0.0-3.3
Remained about the same 1.5 0.0-3.3
Decreased 1.1 0.0-2.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 17.8 12.5-23.1
Not checked 78.2 72.4-84.0

13a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


2B. Coordination with in-country Department of State representatives

14. Do you coordinate with any (other) in-country Department of State (State) representatives from the Embassy in planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

Coordination refers to any joint action by two or more individuals, groups, or organizations (participants) that is intended to produce more public value than could be produced when one individual, group or organization acted alone. Coordination entails (1) repeated contacts with other participants, rather than one-time interactions; (2) a balanced exchange of substantive information among participants; and (3) participants taking meaningful actions in response to information received from other participants.

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes, I coordinate with Embassy representatives. 74.7 68.8-80.6
No, I do not coordinate with Embassy representatives. 24.0 18.2-29.7
Not checked 1.4 0.0-3.1

15. Which of the following Embassy representatives have you coordinated with to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Coordination with Embassy Chief of Mission (CoM) or Deputy Chief of Mission (DCM)

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 84.7 79.1-90.3
Do not coordinate with 6.1 2.6-9.7
Not applicable 7.8 3.5-12.1
Not checked 1.4 0.0-3.1

Coordination with Embassy Political/Economic officers

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 86.2 80.7-91.8
Do not coordinate with 2.4 0.2-4.5
Not applicable 10.0 5.1-15.0
Not checked 1.4 0.0-3.1

Coordination with Embassy public affairs officers

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 74.4 67.7-81.2
Do not coordinate with 9.0 5.0-13.0
Not applicable 13.8 8.2-19.3
Not checked 2.8 0.3-5.2

Coordination with other Embassy staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 29.3 21.9-36.7
Do not coordinate with 2.0 0.2-3.7
Not applicable 22.5 15.8-29.1
Not checked 46.3 38.3-54.3

15a. If other Embassy staff, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


16. About how often have you participated in each of the following with those Embassy representatives to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Food security or FtF working group meetings with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.4 0.0-3.1
Monthly 27.4 20.2-34.6
Quarterly 51.7 43.7-59.7
Yearly 10.8 6.0-15.6
Less than once per year 3.6 0.4-6.9
Not at all 5.2 1.8-8.5

Joint meetings with host country government officials with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 10.5 5.3-15.6
Quarterly 42.8 34.8-50.7
Yearly 8.4 4.0-12.7
Less than once per year 3.2 0.3-6.1
Not at all 33.8 26.3-41.3
Not checked 1.4 0.0-3.1

Joint meetings with other stakeholders with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 8.7 3.9-13.4
Quarterly 43.3 35.3-51.2
Yearly 12.6 7.4-17.8
Less than once per year 3.2 0.3-6.1
Not at all 29.1 21.9-36.3
Not checked 3.2 0.3-6.1

Joint visits to FtF project sites in country with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 5.0 1.4-8.6
Quarterly 22.9 16.0-29.8
Yearly 12.3 7.4-17.2
Less than once per year 11.1 6.2-16.0
Not at all 47.3 39.3-55.3
Not checked 1.4 0.0-3.1

Joint attendance at regional or in-country conferences or workshops with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 3.2 0.3-6.1
Quarterly 18.4 12.2-24.7
Yearly 8.0 3.8-12.1
Less than once per year 16.1 10.3-21.9
Not at all 53.0 45.0-60.9
Not checked 1.4 0.0-3.1

Other activity with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.4 0.0-3.1
Not at all 19.4 13.0-25.7
Not checked 79.3 72.8-85.7

16a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


17. In your view, how effective, if at all, has your coordination with those Embassy representatives been in accomplishing each of the following actions related to FtF planning or implementation in _____?

(View question)

Developing or contributing to integrated FTF program documents with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 43.1 35.2-51.1
Somewhat effective 40.8 33.0-48.6
Not effective 4.1 1.1-7.1
Has not occurred 7.8 3.4-12.2
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Integrating FtF program or project planning with other US foreign assistance programs with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 42.7 34.8-50.7
Somewhat effective 39.3 31.5-47.1
Not effective 2.8 0.3-5.2
Has not occurred 11.1 6.2-16.0
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with host government officials with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 44.1 36.1-52.1
Somewhat effective 25.9 19.0-32.8
Not effective 6.0 2.2-9.7
Has not occurred 19.9 13.6-26.2
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with other stakeholders with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 34.1 26.4-41.7
Somewhat effective 38.8 31.0-46.5
Not effective 3.2 0.3-6.1
Has not occurred 18.0 11.8-24.2
Not checked 6.0 2.2-9.7

Making progress on needed policy reforms in host country with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 21.1 14.4-27.8
Somewhat effective 37.4 29.6-45.1
Not effective 10.6 5.6-15.5
Has not occurred 25.5 18.6-32.3
Not checked 5.5 2.1-8.9

Identifying donors or partners with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 33.4 25.8-41.1
Somewhat effective 35.7 28.1-43.3
Not effective 3.7 1.0-6.5
Has not occurred 23.0 16.2-29.8
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Developing joint or compatible procedures or processes for FtF activities with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 34.5 26.8-42.2
Somewhat effective 32.7 25.2-40.2
Not effective 2.4 0.2-4.5
Has not occurred 23.1 16.4-29.8
Not checked 7.3 3.3-11.4

Developing joint communication plans, reports and/or and cables with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 36.7 28.9-44.5
Somewhat effective 37.9 30.1-45.6
Has not occurred 18.1 12.1-24.1
Not checked 7.3 3.3-11.4

Other action with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 1.8 0.0-4.1
Somewhat effective 4.2 1.1-7.3
Has not occurred 14.3 8.8-19.8
Not checked 79.7 73.3-86.1

17a. If other action, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


18. As a result of the coordination efforts with those Embassy representatives, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Complexity of planning for FtF projects or activities with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 32.6 25.0-40.1
Remained about the same 38.0 30.2-45.8
Decreased 3.2 0.3-6.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 23.5 16.8-30.2
Not checked 2.8 0.3-5.2

Speed of planning for FtF projects or activities with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 20.6 14.0-27.2
Remained about the same 44.0 36.1-51.9
Decreased 5.5 2.1-8.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 27.1 20.0-34.3
Not checked 2.8 0.3-5.2

Budgeting or funding amount for FtF projects or activities with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 18.4 12.1-24.6
Remained about the same 33.4 25.9-40.9
Decreased 4.6 1.2-7.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 39.5 31.7-47.4
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Consistency of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 14.7 8.8-20.5
Remained about the same 31.9 24.5-39.4
Decreased 3.2 0.3-6.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 46.1 38.1-54.0
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 13.8 8.2-19.3
Remained about the same 36.0 28.3-43.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 46.1 38.1-54.0
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Speed of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 13.7 7.9-19.4
Remained about the same 35.7 28.1-43.4
Decreased 2.8 0.3-5.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 43.7 35.8-51.6
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 18.8 12.5-25.2
Remained about the same 33.9 26.4-41.4
Decreased 3.2 0.3-6.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 35.4 27.7-43.0
Not checked 8.7 4.3-13.1

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 17.9 11.6-24.1
Remained about the same 33.9 26.4-41.4
Decreased 4.1 1.1-7.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 40.0 32.1-47.8
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Efficiency with which you are able to carry out your FtF duties with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 38.6 30.8-46.5
Remained about the same 34.2 26.6-41.8
Decreased 2.4 0.2-4.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 19.7 13.4-26.1
Not checked 5.1 1.9-8.3

Your FtF-related knowledge and expertise with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 68.1 60.7-75.4
Remained about the same 17.7 11.8-23.6
Don't know/ too soon to tell 10.1 5.4-14.9
Not checked 4.1 1.1-7.1

Clarity of roles and responsibilities between you and State representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 50.5 42.5-58.4
Remained about the same 29.7 22.5-37.0
Decreased 2.4 0.2-4.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 11.5 6.5-16.5
Not checked 6.0 2.2-9.7

Mutual respect in working relationships with State representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 58.3 50.5-66.1
Remained about the same 27.5 20.5-34.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 6.9 3.0-10.8
Not checked 7.3 3.3-11.4

Other feature with State

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Remained about the same 2.8 0.2-5.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 16.2 10.6-21.9
Not checked 81.0 74.9-87.0

18a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


2C. Coordination with in-country Department of Agriculture representatives

19. Do you coordinate with any other in-country Department of Agriculture (USDA) representatives in planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

Coordination refers to any joint action by two or more individuals, groups, or organizations (participants) that is intended to produce more public value than could be produced when one individual, group or organization acted alone. Coordination entails (1) repeated contacts with other participants, rather than one-time interactions; (2) a balanced exchange of substantive information among participants; and (3) participants taking meaningful actions in response to information received from other participants.

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes, I coordinate with USDA representatives. 40.5 33.8-47.2
No, I do not coordinate with USDA representatives. 56.0 49.3-62.8
Not checked 3.5 0.9-6.0

20. Which of the following USDA representatives have you coordinated with to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Coordination with FAS staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 78.5 69.8-87.1
Not applicable 17.2 9.2-25.2
Not checked 4.3 0.3-8.3

Coordination with APHIS staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 29.9 20.4-39.3
Do not coordinate with 21.1 11.8-30.4
Not applicable 38.1 27.3-48.9
Not checked 11.0 4.2-17.8

Coordination with other in-country USDA staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 7.0 1.6-12.3
Do not coordinate with 13.4 5.4-21.5
Not applicable 41.7 30.8-52.5
Not checked 37.9 27.5-48.3

Coordination with USDA regional attache

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 64.5 54.3-74.8
Not applicable 17.3 9.1-25.4
Not checked 18.2 10.3-26.1

Coordination with other regional USDA staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 7.0 1.6-12.3
Do not coordinate with 3.4 0.0-7.6
Not applicable 29.6 19.4-39.9
Not checked 60.0 49.2-70.9

20a. If other USDA in-country or regional staff, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


21. About how often have you participated in each of the following with those USDA representatives to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Food security or FtF working group meetings with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 3.6 0.3-6.9
Monthly 18.3 10.2-26.3
Quarterly 50.0 39.1-60.9
Yearly 8.5 2.2-14.8
Less than once per year 14.4 6.5-22.3
Not at all 5.2 0.3-10.0

Joint meetings with host country government officials with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.8 0.0-4.2
Monthly 8.5 2.2-14.8
Quarterly 17.5 9.7-25.4
Yearly 27.3 17.4-37.1
Less than once per year 6.7 0.8-12.7
Not at all 35.6 25.1-46.1
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Joint meetings with other stakeholders with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.8 0.0-4.2
Monthly 10.6 4.4-16.7
Quarterly 25.7 16.2-35.2
Yearly 16.2 8.1-24.4
Less than once per year 6.7 0.8-12.7
Not at all 36.4 25.8-47.0
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Joint visits to FtF project sites in country with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.8 0.0-4.2
Monthly 1.8 0.0-4.2
Quarterly 20.6 11.8-29.5
Yearly 15.4 7.6-23.2
Less than once per year 8.5 2.2-14.8
Not at all 49.3 38.4-60.2
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Joint attendance at regional or in-country conferences or workshops with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.8 0.0-4.2
Monthly 1.8 0.0-4.2
Quarterly 15.7 8.2-23.3
Yearly 23.7 14.1-33.2
Less than once per year 12.6 4.9-20.3
Not at all 41.8 31.1-52.6
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Other activity with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 1.8 0.0-4.2
Not at all 31.4 21.0-41.7
Not checked 66.8 56.4-77.2

21a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


22. In your view, how effective, if at all, has your coordination with those USDA representatives been in accomplishing each of the following actions related to FtF planning or implementation in _____?

(View question)

Developing or contributing to integrated FTF program documents with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 50.4 39.4-61.3
Somewhat effective 28.3 18.5-38.2
Not effective 3.4 0.0-7.6
Has not occurred 15.4 7.6-23.2
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Integrating FtF program or project planning with other US foreign assistance programs with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 50.4 39.4-61.3
Somewhat effective 29.9 19.8-40.0
Not effective 5.2 0.3-10.0
Has not occurred 14.6 7.2-22.0

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with host government officials with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 38.4 27.7-49.1
Somewhat effective 34.2 23.8-44.6
Not effective 3.4 0.0-7.6
Has not occurred 21.5 12.9-30.0
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with other stakeholders with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 40.9 30.1-51.8
Somewhat effective 33.4 23.2-43.7
Has not occurred 23.1 14.0-32.2
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Making progress on needed policy reforms in host country with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 31.6 21.5-41.8
Somewhat effective 29.1 19.1-39.0
Not effective 11.9 4.5-19.3
Has not occurred 21.5 12.9-30.2
Not checked 5.9 0.6-11.2

Identifying donors or partners with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 40.1 29.4-50.9
Somewhat effective 30.9 20.8-40.9
Not effective 1.8 0.0-4.2
Has not occurred 24.6 15.1-34.1
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Developing joint or compatible procedures or processes for FtF activities with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 31.6 21.5-41.8
Somewhat effective 39.4 28.7-50.1
Not effective 1.8 0.0-4.2
Has not occurred 19.5 10.7-28.2
Not checked 7.7 2.0-13.4

Developing joint communication plans, reports and/or and cables with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 38.3 27.6-49.0
Somewhat effective 27.5 17.9-37.2
Not effective 5.2 0.3-10.0
Has not occurred 26.5 16.8-36.1
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Other action with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 8.5 2.2-14.8
Somewhat effective 3.4 0.0-7.6
Has not occurred 23.9 14.6-33.3
Not checked 64.2 53.6-74.8

22a. If other action, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


23. As a result of the coordination efforts with those USDA representatives, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Complexity of planning for FtF projects or activities with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 22.4 13.4-31.3
Remained about the same 50.5 39.5-61.4
Decreased 7.7 2.0-13.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 13.6 6.1-21.1
Not checked 5.9 0.6-11.2

Speed of planning for FtF projects or activities with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 28.3 18.5-38.0
Remained about the same 45.5 34.7-56.4
Decreased 5.9 0.6-11.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 17.8 9.1-26.4
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Budgeting or funding amount for FtF projects or activities with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 21.4 12.3-30.4
Remained about the same 38.8 28.3-49.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 33.9 23.4-44.4
Not checked 5.9 0.6-11.2

Consistency of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 16.5 8.7-24.3
Remained about the same 45.3 34.4-56.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 35.7 25.2-46.2
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 14.7 7.1-22.2
Remained about the same 50.5 39.5-61.4
Decreased 1.8 0.0-4.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 30.5 20.4-40.7
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Speed of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 15.4 7.6-23.2
Remained about the same 47.4 36.5-58.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 31.4 21.0-41.7
Not checked 5.9 0.6-11.2

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 18.0 9.7-26.4
Remained about the same 40.4 29.7-51.1
Decreased 10.2 3.7-16.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 23.7 14.1-33.2
Not checked 7.7 2.0-13.4

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 20.6 11.8-29.3
Remained about the same 44.0 33.2-54.8
Don't know/ too soon to tell 32.9 22.4-43.4
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Efficiency with which you are able to carry out your FtF duties with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 33.3 23.1-43.5
Remained about the same 48.2 37.3-59.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 15.1 7.0-23.3
Not checked 3.4 0.0-7.6

Your FtF-related knowledge and expertise with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 47.7 36.8-58.7
Remained about the same 41.3 30.5-52.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 5.9 0.6-11.2
Not checked 5.1 0.5-9.6

Clarity of roles and responsibilities between you and USDA representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 40.0 29.3-50.8
Remained about the same 49.7 38.8-60.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 8.4 2.3-14.6
Not checked 1.8 0.0-4.2

Mutual respect in working relationships with USDA representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 55.4 44.6-66.3
Remained about the same 35.3 24.9-45.7
Decreased 3.4 0.0-7.6
Don't know/ too soon to tell 5.9 0.6-11.2

Other feature with USDA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Remained about the same 12.1 5.2-19.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 24.7 15.2-34.3
Not checked 63.1 52.6-73.7

23a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


2D. Coordination with in-country Peace Corps representatives

24. Do you coordinate with any other in-country Peace Corps representatives in planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

Coordination refers to any joint action by two or more individuals, groups, or organizations (participants) that is intended to produce more public value than could be produced when one individual, group or organization acted alone. Coordination entails (1) repeated contacts with other participants, rather than one-time interactions; (2) a balanced exchange of substantive information among participants; and (3) participants taking meaningful actions in response to information received from other participants.

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes, I coordinate with Peace Corps representatives. 46.7 39.8-53.5
No, I do not coordinate Peace Corps representatives. 45.7 38.9-52.6
Not checked 7.6 4.0-11.2

25. Which of the following Peace Corps representatives have you coordinated with to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Coordination with PC Country Director

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 76.3 68.0-84.7
Do not coordinate with 3.1 0.3-6.0
Not applicable 16.1 8.8-23.5
Not checked 4.4 0.4-8.4

Coordination with PC DPT

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 44.0 33.8-54.1
Do not coordinate with 19.4 11.5-27.3
Not applicable 27.1 18.0-36.2
Not checked 9.5 3.6-15.5

Coordination with PC DMO

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 41.1 31.0-51.1
Do not coordinate with 31.9 22.4-41.3
Not applicable 22.7 14.0-31.3
Not checked 4.4 0.4-8.4

Coordination with PC APCD

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 52.2 42.0-62.4
Do not coordinate with 15.6 8.3-22.8
Not applicable 25.6 16.5-34.6
Not checked 6.7 1.7-11.7

Coordination with PCVs

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 42.6 32.5-52.6
Do not coordinate with 28.1 18.9-37.2
Not applicable 27.8 18.5-37.0
Not checked 1.6 0.0-3.6

Coordination with other PC staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 21.4 13.4-29.4
Do not coordinate with 14.2 7.5-20.9
Not applicable 27.7 18.2-37.2
Not checked 36.7 26.8-46.5

25a. If other Peace Corps in-country staff, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


26. About how often have you participated in each of the following with those Peace Corps representatives to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Food security or FtF working group meetings with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 11.0 4.9-17.1
Monthly 16.1 8.3-23.9
Quarterly 46.3 36.1-56.4
Yearly 6.0 1.6-10.4
Less than once per year 4.5 0.3-8.7
Not at all 9.6 3.5-15.7
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Joint meetings with host country government officials with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 2.2 0.0-5.0
Monthly 2.9 0.0-6.6
Quarterly 25.6 16.5-34.6
Yearly 4.4 0.4-8.4
Less than once per year 7.4 1.9-12.9
Not at all 48.7 38.5-58.9
Not checked 8.8 3.3-14.3

Joint meetings with other stakeholders with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 2.2 0.0-5.0
Monthly 6.6 1.8-11.4
Quarterly 27.8 18.5-37.0
Yearly 4.5 0.3-8.7
Less than once per year 4.5 0.3-8.7
Not at all 45.6 35.5-55.8
Not checked 8.8 3.3-14.3

Joint visits to FtF project sites in country with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 2.2 0.0-5.0
Monthly 4.4 0.4-8.4
Quarterly 19.0 10.6-27.3
Yearly 7.3 2.0-12.7
Less than once per year 2.9 0.0-6.6
Not at all 53.8 43.6-64.0
Not checked 10.4 4.6-16.2

Joint attendance at regional or in-country conferences or workshops with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 2.2 0.0-5.0
Quarterly 19.1 11.1-27.2
Yearly 5.8 0.7-11.0
Less than once per year 8.9 3.2-14.5
Not at all 55.2 45.0-65.3
Not checked 8.8 3.3-14.3

Other activity with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 2.2 0.0-5.0
Monthly 2.2 0.0-5.0
Quarterly 1.6 0.0-3.6
Yearly 2.9 0.0-6.6
Not at all 27.9 18.5-37.2
Not checked 63.3 53.4-73.2

26a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


27. In your view, how effective, if at all, has your coordination with those Peace Corps representatives been in accomplishing each of the following actions related to FtF planning or implementation in _____?

(View question)

Developing or contributing to integrated FTF program documents with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 44.8 34.7-54.9
Somewhat effective 33.8 23.9-43.6
Has not occurred 12.7 6.2-19.1
Not checked 8.8 3.3-14.3

Integrating FtF program or project planning with other US foreign assistance programs with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 41.1 31.0-51.1
Somewhat effective 31.4 21.7-41.1
Not effective 1.6 0.0-3.6
Has not occurred 14.2 7.5-20.9
Not checked 11.7 5.3-18.2

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with host government officials with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 34.5 24.7-44.2
Somewhat effective 22.7 14.0-31.3
Not effective 1.6 0.0-3.6
Has not occurred 32.5 23.0-42.0
Not checked 8.8 3.3-14.3

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with other stakeholders with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 36.7 26.8-46.5
Somewhat effective 22.0 13.5-30.4
Not effective 1.6 0.0-3.6
Has not occurred 31.0 21.5-40.5
Not checked 8.8 3.3-14.3

Making progress on needed policy reforms in host country with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 14.6 7.4-21.9
Somewhat effective 34.5 24.8-44.3
Not effective 2.2 0.0-5.0
Has not occurred 39.8 29.8-49.8
Not checked 8.8 3.3-14.3

Identifying donors or partners with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 33.0 23.5-42.6
Somewhat effective 15.3 7.8-22.9
Not effective 1.6 0.0-3.6
Has not occurred 35.4 25.6-45.2
Not checked 14.6 7.4-21.9

Developing joint or compatible procedures or processes for FtF activities with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 37.3 27.4-47.2
Somewhat effective 17.6 9.7-25.4
Not effective 1.6 0.0-3.6
Has not occurred 31.9 22.4-41.3
Not checked 11.7 5.3-18.2

Developing joint communication plans, reports and/or and cables with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 30.0 20.6-39.4
Somewhat effective 18.3 10.1-26.4
Not effective 1.6 0.0-3.6
Has not occurred 41.4 31.4-51.4
Not checked 8.8 3.3-14.3

Other action with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 2.2 0.0-5.0
Somewhat effective 2.9 0.0-6.6
Has not occurred 30.8 21.2-40.4
Not checked 64.1 54.2-74.0

27a. If other action, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


28. As a result of the coordination efforts with those Peace Corps representatives, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Complexity of planning for FtF projects or activities with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 19.8 11.6-27.9
Remained about the same 34.6 24.8-44.4
Decreased 16.1 8.8-23.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 22.9 14.4-31.4
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Speed of planning for FtF projects or activities with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 16.8 9.2-24.5
Remained about the same 44.1 34.0-54.3
Decreased 6.6 1.8-11.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 23.6 14.9-32.3
Not checked 8.8 3.3-14.3

Budgeting or funding amount for FtF projects or activities with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 11.7 5.3-18.2
Remained about the same 39.7 29.6-49.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 37.6 27.7-47.5
Not checked 11.0 4.9-17.1

Consistency of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 9.5 3.6-15.5
Remained about the same 30.8 21.2-40.5
Decreased 4.4 0.4-8.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 48.6 38.4-58.8
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 6.6 1.8-11.4
Remained about the same 33.0 23.3-42.8
Decreased 11.7 5.3-18.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 42.0 32.0-52.1
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Speed of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 6.6 1.8-11.4
Remained about the same 33.0 23.3-42.8
Decreased 4.4 0.4-8.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 49.3 39.1-59.5
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 6.6 1.8-11.4
Remained about the same 35.3 25.4-45.1
Decreased 13.9 7.0-20.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 37.6 27.7-47.5
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 16.1 8.8-23.5
Remained about the same 30.1 20.6-39.7
Decreased 4.4 0.4-8.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 42.7 32.6-52.8
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Efficiency with which you are able to carry out your FtF duties with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 29.3 20.0-38.6
Remained about the same 28.1 18.9-37.2
Decreased 2.2 0.0-5.0
Don't know/ too soon to tell 28.0 18.9-37.1
Not checked 12.4 5.6-19.2

Your FtF-related knowledge and expertise with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 45.5 35.3-55.6
Remained about the same 31.7 22.1-41.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 16.2 8.8-23.6
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Clarity of roles and responsibilities between you and PC representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 41.1 31.0-51.1
Remained about the same 39.0 29.0-49.0
Don't know/ too soon to tell 13.3 6.6-20.0
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Mutual respect in working relationships with PC representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 52.9 42.7-63.0
Remained about the same 32.3 22.7-42.0
Don't know/ too soon to tell 8.2 3.0-13.4
Not checked 6.6 1.8-11.4

Other feature with PC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Remained about the same 5.8 0.7-11.0
Don't know/ too soon to tell 26.3 17.1-35.5
Not checked 67.9 58.1-77.7

28a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


2E. Coordination with other in-country USG representatives

29. Do you coordinate with any other in-country USG representatives in planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

Coordination refers to any joint action by two or more individuals, groups, or organizations (participants) that is intended to produce more public value than could be produced when one individual, group or organization acted alone. Coordination entails (1) repeated contacts with other participants, rather than one-time interactions; (2) a balanced exchange of substantive information among participants; and (3) participants taking meaningful actions in response to information received from other participants.

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes, I coordinate with other USG representatives. 40.6 33.9-47.3
No, I do not coordinate other USG representatives. 54.6 47.8-61.4
Not checked 4.8 1.8-7.8

30. Which of the following other USG representatives have you coordinated with to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Coordination with FCS

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 32.3 22.0-42.7
Do not coordinate with 23.8 14.5-33.0
Not applicable 38.0 27.4-48.7
Not checked 5.9 0.6-11.2

Coordination with OPIC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 6.7 0.8-12.6
Do not coordinate with 31.4 21.3-41.6
Not applicable 44.0 33.1-54.9
Not checked 17.9 9.6-26.1

Coordination with MCC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 52.3 41.3-63.3
Do not coordinate with 15.4 7.6-23.1
Not applicable 25.4 15.7-35.1
Not checked 6.9 1.6-12.3

Coordination with USTR

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 20.6 11.7-29.4
Do not coordinate with 21.2 12.3-30.2
Not applicable 42.1 31.2-53.0
Not checked 16.1 8.1-24.1

Coordination with USADF

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 25.1 15.2-35.1
Do not coordinate with 28.2 18.4-38.0
Not applicable 28.8 19.0-38.7
Not checked 17.9 9.6-26.1

Coordination with CDC

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 50.7 39.7-61.7
Do not coordinate with 18.7 10.1-27.3
Not applicable 16.1 8.1-24.1
Not checked 14.5 7.1-21.9

Coordination with DOD

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 49.0 38.0-60.0
Do not coordinate with 23.8 14.5-33.0
Not applicable 12.7 5.6-19.9
Not checked 14.5 7.1-21.9

Coordination with NOAA

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Do not coordinate with 34.9 24.4-45.4
Not applicable 44.7 33.8-55.7
Not checked 20.4 11.7-29.1

Coordination with other USG

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 12.0 5.2-18.8
Do not coordinate with 6.9 1.8-12.0
Not applicable 32.1 21.6-42.5
Not checked 49.1 38.1-60.1

30a. If other USG representatives, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


31. About how often has each of the following actions occurred as part of your coordination with those other USG representatives in planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Share observations obtained through meetings with host government officials with USG reps

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 20.2 11.2-29.1
Monthly 21.9 12.3-31.4
Quarterly 35.4 24.9-45.9
Yearly 3.6 0.3-6.9
Less than once per year 3.6 0.3-6.9
Not at all 12.8 5.6-20.1
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Share observations obtained through meetings with other USG representatives with USG reps

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 27.8 17.9-37.7
Monthly 19.5 10.7-28.4
Quarterly 35.5 25.0-46.0
Yearly 6.1 1.5-10.7
Less than once per year 1.8 0.0-4.1
Not at all 3.3 0.0-7.6
Not checked 5.9 0.6-11.2

Share observations obtained through meetings with non-government stakeholders with USG reps

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 16.8 8.6-25.1
Monthly 24.4 14.6-34.2
Quarterly 21.1 11.8-30.3
Yearly 12.3 5.9-18.6
Less than once per year 2.5 0.0-5.8
Not at all 20.4 11.7-29.1
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Receive technical assistance from other USG representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 14.3 6.5-22.1
Monthly 18.5 9.6-27.5
Quarterly 19.5 10.7-28.4
Yearly 11.3 4.8-17.8
Not at all 33.9 23.6-44.2
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Receive guidance from other USG representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 14.3 6.5-22.1
Monthly 21.9 12.3-31.4
Quarterly 33.0 22.6-43.3
Yearly 7.2 2.6-11.8
Less than once per year 4.3 0.3-8.3
Not at all 16.8 8.6-25.1
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Receive additional resources from other USG representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 5.1 0.5-9.6
Monthly 18.5 9.6-27.5
Quarterly 17.7 9.0-26.4
Yearly 15.4 7.6-23.1
Less than once per year 3.3 0.0-7.6
Not at all 32.3 22.3-42.4
Not checked 7.7 1.9-13.4

Provide technical assistance to other USG representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 8.4 2.3-14.5
Monthly 21.1 11.8-30.3
Quarterly 24.6 15.1-34.1
Yearly 5.4 1.4-9.4
Less than once per year 5.1 0.3-10.0
Not at all 32.9 22.6-43.2
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Provide guidance to other USG representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 15.1 7.0-23.2
Monthly 22.9 13.4-32.3
Quarterly 22.0 12.8-31.2
Yearly 6.1 1.5-10.7
Less than once per year 1.8 0.0-4.1
Not at all 24.4 15.0-33.8
Not checked 7.7 1.9-13.4

Provide additional resources to other USG representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 8.4 2.3-14.5
Monthly 19.3 10.1-28.4
Quarterly 16.2 8.0-24.3
Yearly 7.9 2.8-13.1
Less than once per year 5.1 0.3-10.0
Not at all 40.6 29.8-51.3
Not checked 2.5 0.0-5.8

Other action with USG rep

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Quarterly 2.5 0.0-5.8
Not at all 13.6 6.0-21.1
Not checked 83.9 75.9-91.9

31a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


2F. Field-based coordination among all USG representatives

32. Has each of the following factors helped, hindered, or had no effect on your coordination with all various in-country USG representatives to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

The amount ongoing communication with other USG representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 42.7 35.9-49.6
Somewhat helped 31.1 24.8-37.4
No effect 6.3 3.3-9.3
Somewhat hindered 2.1 0.2-3.9
Greatly hindered 2.1 0.2-3.9
No opinion 10.6 6.5-14.8
Not checked 5.1 1.9-8.3

The amount of FtF-related data shared among USG representatives in the field

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 36.0 29.4-42.6
Somewhat helped 31.7 25.4-38.1
No effect 10.9 6.8-15.1
Somewhat hindered 2.1 0.2-3.9
Greatly hindered 2.8 0.7-4.8
No opinion 11.4 7.2-15.6
Not checked 5.1 1.9-8.3

Staffing levels in your agency in the field

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 18.5 13.1-23.9
Somewhat helped 14.1 9.4-18.8
No effect 24.2 18.4-29.9
Somewhat hindered 11.3 7.0-15.7
Greatly hindered 9.4 5.5-13.3
No opinion 17.4 12.2-22.6
Not checked 5.1 1.9-8.3

Technical expertise of other USG representatives in the field

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 27.8 21.6-34.0
Somewhat helped 35.1 28.6-41.6
No effect 7.3 3.8-10.7
Somewhat hindered 1.0 0.0-2.3
No opinion 21.6 16.1-27.2
Not checked 7.2 3.5-10.9

Staffing levels in other USG agencies in the field

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 13.7 9.0-18.5
Somewhat helped 23.3 17.4-29.2
No effect 16.3 11.4-21.3
Somewhat hindered 6.9 3.4-10.4
Greatly hindered 2.1 0.2-4.0
No opinion 30.2 24.0-36.4
Not checked 7.5 3.7-11.2

Compatibility of performance goals and measures

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 18.5 13.1-23.9
Somewhat helped 25.0 19.0-31.1
No effect 23.4 17.7-29.1
Somewhat hindered 4.5 1.6-7.3
Greatly hindered 1.5 0.2-2.8
No opinion 22.0 16.5-27.5
Not checked 5.1 1.9-8.3

Compatibility of agencies' procedures

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 6.9 3.4-10.4
Somewhat helped 17.5 12.2-22.8
No effect 27.5 21.4-33.6
Somewhat hindered 13.1 8.5-17.6
Greatly hindered 4.0 1.7-6.2
No opinion 24.7 18.8-30.6
Not checked 6.5 2.9-10.0

Compatibility of agencies' computer systems

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 6.6 3.2-10.0
Somewhat helped 5.9 2.8-9.1
No effect 31.6 25.3-37.9
Somewhat hindered 17.5 12.2-22.8
Greatly hindered 0.7 0.0-1.7
No opinion 30.2 23.9-36.4
Not checked 7.5 3.7-11.2

Clarity of instructions from various management levels within your agency with USG reps

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 16.4 11.3-21.6
Somewhat helped 26.0 20.0-32.0
No effect 21.7 16.1-27.3
Somewhat hindered 11.4 7.2-15.7
Greatly hindered 3.2 1.2-5.3
No opinion 15.0 10.1-19.9
Not checked 6.1 2.7-9.5

Clarity of FtF plan or implementation roles and responsibilities with USG reps

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 25.0 18.9-31.0
Somewhat helped 24.4 18.5-30.2
No effect 15.2 10.3-20.0
Somewhat hindered 11.0 6.7-15.4
Greatly hindered 5.0 2.4-7.6
No opinion 13.0 8.5-17.5
Not checked 6.5 2.9-10.0

Amount of funding effect with USG reps

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 14.7 9.9-19.6
Somewhat helped 12.7 8.3-17.2
No effect 22.4 16.8-28.1
Somewhat hindered 10.7 6.5-14.9
Greatly hindered 9.0 5.0-13.0
No opinion 23.9 18.1-29.8
Not checked 6.5 2.9-10.0

Flexibility of funding effect with USG reps

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 9.6 5.7-13.6
Somewhat helped 13.1 8.5-17.6
No effect 22.5 16.8-28.1
Somewhat hindered 11.6 7.2-16.1
Greatly hindered 9.1 5.3-12.9
No opinion 27.7 21.5-33.8
Not checked 6.5 2.9-10.0

Other factor

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
No effect 4.5 1.6-7.3
No opinion 25.0 19.1-30.9
Not checked 70.5 64.3-76.8

32a. If other factor, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


33. In your view, how effective, if at all, has your coordination with all various in-country USG representatives been in accomplishing each of the following actions related to FtF planning or implementation in _____?

(View question)

Developing or contributing to integrated FTF program documents with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 37.0 30.4-43.7
Somewhat effective 36.5 30.0-43.1
Not effective 3.9 1.4-6.3
Has not occurred 15.4 10.5-20.3
Not checked 7.2 3.6-10.8

Integrating FtF program or project planning with other US foreign assistance programs with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 36.6 30.0-43.3
Somewhat effective 33.1 26.7-39.5
Not effective 5.6 2.7-8.5
Has not occurred 16.4 11.4-21.5
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with host government officials with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 29.4 23.0-35.8
Somewhat effective 29.3 23.1-35.5
Not effective 6.3 3.3-9.4
Has not occurred 23.7 18.0-29.5
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.6

Sharing observations or information obtained through meetings with other stakeholders with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 32.2 25.7-38.7
Somewhat effective 27.3 21.3-33.3
Not effective 4.6 1.9-7.2
Has not occurred 27.8 21.7-33.8
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Making progress on needed policy reforms in host country with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 15.4 10.4-20.5
Somewhat effective 35.4 28.9-42.0
Not effective 10.7 6.5-14.9
Has not occurred 25.5 19.6-31.3
Not checked 13.0 8.3-17.6

Identifying donors or partners with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 27.0 20.9-33.2
Somewhat effective 30.8 24.5-37.0
Not effective 3.6 1.2-5.9
Has not occurred 29.1 22.9-35.3
Not checked 9.5 5.4-13.7

Developing joint or compatible procedures or processes for FtF activities with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 30.8 24.4-37.2
Somewhat effective 29.3 23.1-35.5
Not effective 6.3 3.3-9.4
Has not occurred 21.9 16.3-27.5
Not checked 11.6 7.2-16.1

Developing joint communication plans, reports and/or and cables with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 32.6 26.1-39.0
Somewhat effective 20.6 15.0-26.2
Not effective 5.7 3.0-8.4
Has not occurred 29.2 23.0-35.3
Not checked 11.9 7.4-16.5

Other action with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Very effective 1.0 0.0-2.3
Somewhat effective 0.7 0.0-1.7
Not effective 0.7 0.0-1.7
Has not occurred 24.6 18.7-30.6
Not checked 72.9 66.8-79.0

33a. If other action, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


34. As a result of the coordination efforts with all various in-country USG representatives, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Complexity of planning for FtF projects or activities with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 26.1 20.1-32.1
Remained about the same 31.1 24.8-37.4
Decreased 5.5 2.4-8.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 29.1 22.9-35.3
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Speed of planning for FtF projects or activities with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 17.4 12.2-22.7
Remained about the same 31.6 25.3-37.9
Decreased 6.5 3.2-9.8
Don't know/ too soon to tell 36.3 29.7-42.9
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Budgeting or funding amount for FtF projects or activities with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 17.1 11.9-22.3
Remained about the same 24.3 18.5-30.1
Decreased 1.8 0.2-3.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 48.6 41.8-55.5
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Consistency of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 11.6 7.2-16.1
Remained about the same 25.9 20.0-31.9
Decreased 2.8 0.7-4.8
Don't know/ too soon to tell 51.4 44.6-58.3
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 13.8 9.2-18.4
Remained about the same 28.0 21.9-34.2
Decreased 3.4 0.9-5.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 46.6 39.7-53.4
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Speed of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 10.6 6.3-14.9
Remained about the same 27.7 21.6-33.8
Decreased 2.8 0.7-4.8
Don't know/ too soon to tell 50.7 43.9-57.5
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 16.9 11.7-22.0
Remained about the same 27.4 21.4-33.5
Decreased 5.5 2.4-8.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 42.1 35.3-48.8
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 14.7 9.9-19.6
Remained about the same 25.4 19.4-31.3
Decreased 3.8 1.4-6.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 47.9 41.1-54.7
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Efficiency with which you are able to carry out your FtF duties with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 26.4 20.3-32.5
Remained about the same 29.8 23.6-36.0
Decreased 3.8 1.4-6.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 31.8 25.4-38.1
Not checked 8.2 4.4-12.0

Your FtF-related knowledge and expertise with all

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 52.7 45.9-59.5
Remained about the same 14.5 9.6-19.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 18.1 12.9-23.4
Not checked 14.7 9.9-19.6

Clarity of roles and responsibilities between you and all representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 38.4 31.7-45.1
Remained about the same 26.4 20.5-32.3
Decreased 1.8 0.2-3.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 24.2 18.3-30.1
Not checked 9.2 5.2-13.2

Mutual respect in working relationships with all representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 46.6 39.8-53.4
Remained about the same 24.3 18.6-30.0
Decreased 0.7 0.0-1.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 19.1 13.8-24.5
Not checked 9.2 5.2-13.2

Other feature with all representatives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 1.4 0.0-3.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 24.0 18.1-29.9
Not checked 74.6 68.6-80.6

34a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


35. To date, what has been the overall effect of FtF's whole-of-government approach (e.g., widespread interagency coordination) on project or program planning or implementation?

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Section 3. Coordination with your agency headquarters

36. Have you coordinated with any offices at your agency's headquarters in planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes 66.5 60.0-73.0
No 28.3 22.1-34.5
Not checked 5.2 2.3-8.1

If you are a USAID employee, go to question 37
If you are a State employee, go to question 38
If you are a USDA employee, go to question 39
If you are a Peace Corps employee, go to question 40
If you are employed by another agency, go to question 41

(View question)

37. IF YOU ARE A USAID EMPLOYEE, with which of the following offices at headquarters have you coordinated to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

After responding, go to question 41

(View question)

Coordination with USAID Office of the Administrator

(View question)

not applicable to your agency


Coordination with USAID BFS

(View question)

not applicable to your agency


Coordination with USAID EGAT

(View question)

not applicable to your agency


Coordination with USAID DCHA

(View question)

not applicable to your agency


Coordination with USAID Global Health

(View question)

not applicable to your agency


Coordination with other USAID HQ

(View question)

not applicable to your agency


37a. If other USAID headquarters staff, please specify:

(View question)

not applicable to your agency


38. IF YOU ARE A STATE EMPLOYEE, with which of the following offices at headquarters have you coordinated to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

After responding, go to question 41

(View question)

Coordination with State S/GFS

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 58.3 44.8-71.8
Do not coordinate with 12.5 3.4-21.6
Not applicable 8.3 0.8-15.9
Not checked 20.8 9.7-32.0

Coordination with State EB

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 54.2 40.5-67.8
Do not coordinate with 16.7 6.4-26.9
Not applicable 8.3 0.8-15.9
Not checked 20.8 9.7-32.0

Coordination with State Foreign Assistance Resources

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 33.3 20.4-46.3
Do not coordinate with 33.3 20.4-46.3
Not applicable 8.3 0.8-15.9
Not checked 25.0 13.1-36.9

Coordination with State Regional Bureau

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 91.7 84.1-99.2
Do not coordinate with 4.2 0.0-9.6
Not checked 4.2 0.0-9.6

Coordination with other State HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 4.2 0.0-9.6
Not applicable 20.8 9.7-32.0
Not checked 75.0 63.1-86.9

38a. If other State headquarters staff, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


39. IF YOU ARE A USDA EMPLOYEE, with which of the following offices at headquarters have you coordinated to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

After responding, go to question 41

(View question)

Coordination with USDA FAS

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 78.6 62.9-94.2
Not checked 21.4 5.8-37.1

Coordination with USDA APHIS

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 71.4 54.2-88.6
Do not coordinate with 14.3 1.0-27.6
Not checked 14.3 1.0-27.6

Coordination with USDA environmental staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 21.4 5.8-37.1
Do not coordinate with 35.7 17.5-54.0
Not applicable 7.1 0.0-17.0
Not checked 35.7 17.5-54.0

Coordination with USDA research staff

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 50.0 31.0-69.0
Do not coordinate with 21.4 5.8-37.1
Not checked 28.6 11.4-45.8

Coordination with other USDA HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 35.7 17.5-54.0
Not applicable 7.1 0.0-17.0
Not checked 57.1 38.3-76.0

39a. If other USDA headquarters staff, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


40. IF YOU ARE A PEACE CORPS EMPLOYEE, with which of the following offices at headquarters have you coordinated to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

After responding, go to question 41

(View question)

Coordination with PC regional offices

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 92.9 83.0-100
Not applicable 7.1 0.0-17.0

Coordination with PC desk officers

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 92.9 83.0-100
Not applicable 7.1 0.0-17.0

Coordination with PC budget office

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 57.1 38.3-76.0
Do not coordinate with 21.4 5.8-37.1
Not applicable 14.3 1.0-27.6
Not checked 7.1 0.0-17.0

Coordination with PC Office of Intergovernmental Affairs and Partnerships

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 64.3 46.0-82.5
Do not coordinate with 35.7 17.5-54.0

Coordination with other PC HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Coordinate with 64.3 46.0-82.5
Not checked 35.7 17.5-54.0

40a. If other Peace Corps headquarters staff, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


41. About how often has each of the following actions occurred as part of your coordination with your agency's headquarters staff in planning or implementing FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Share observations with HQ obtained through meetings with host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 6.2 2.3-10.2
Monthly 29.0 21.3-36.7
Quarterly 23.9 16.8-31.0
Yearly 5.3 1.9-8.7
Less than once per year 2.0 0.0-4.6
Not at all 23.8 16.8-30.9
Not checked 9.7 4.4-15.0

Share observations with HQ obtained through meetings with non-government stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 6.2 2.3-10.2
Monthly 27.5 20.0-35.0
Quarterly 32.7 24.8-40.6
Yearly 2.2 0.2-4.2
Less than once per year 4.1 0.5-7.7
Not at all 17.6 11.3-23.9
Not checked 9.7 4.4-15.0

Receive technical assistance from HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 7.3 3.2-11.4
Monthly 22.0 15.3-28.6
Quarterly 25.9 18.6-33.3
Yearly 11.0 5.8-16.2
Less than once per year 4.7 1.2-8.2
Not at all 21.0 13.8-28.1
Not checked 8.2 3.2-13.2

Receive guidance from HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 10.4 5.5-15.2
Monthly 33.4 25.6-41.2
Quarterly 27.8 20.2-35.5
Yearly 6.7 2.5-11.0
Less than once per year 3.1 0.2-6.1
Not at all 5.6 1.6-9.7
Not checked 12.9 7.0-18.7

Receive FtF-related training

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.1 0.0-2.5
Monthly 3.6 0.4-6.8
Quarterly 10.4 5.5-15.3
Yearly 6.3 2.2-10.4
Less than once per year 5.6 1.6-9.7
Not at all 64.8 56.7-72.9
Not checked 8.2 3.2-13.2

Provided technical assistance to HQ related to country

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 3.1 0.3-5.9
Monthly 9.5 5.0-14.1
Quarterly 18.2 11.6-24.7
Yearly 9.5 5.0-14.1
Less than once per year 5.7 2.1-9.4
Not at all 43.7 35.3-52.1
Not checked 10.2 4.7-15.7

Provided guidance to HQ related to country

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 4.6 1.3-8.0
Monthly 25.0 17.8-32.3
Quarterly 35.6 27.5-43.7
Yearly 8.9 4.3-13.6
Less than once per year 4.2 1.1-7.3
Not at all 13.4 7.7-19.2
Not checked 8.2 3.2-13.2

Other action with HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.1 0.0-2.5
Monthly 1.1 0.0-2.5
Not at all 13.5 7.6-19.3
Not checked 84.3 78.3-90.4

41a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


42. Has each of the following factors helped, hindered, or had no effect on your coordination with your agency headquarters to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Staffing levels in your agency

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 14.9 9.0-20.8
Somewhat helped 10.8 5.4-16.1
No effect 28.0 20.4-35.5
Somewhat hindered 20.8 14.0-27.6
Greatly hindered 12.7 7.4-18.0
No opinion 10.8 5.4-16.2
Not checked 2.0 0.0-4.6

Technical expertise of staff in your agency

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 18.2 11.9-24.4
Somewhat helped 18.6 12.0-25.2
No effect 22.8 15.8-29.8
Somewhat hindered 23.3 16.2-30.5
Greatly hindered 2.2 0.2-4.2
No opinion 12.9 7.0-18.7
Not checked 2.0 0.0-4.6

Staffing levels in other USG agencies

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 18.4 11.7-25.2
Somewhat helped 21.1 14.1-28.1
No effect 22.0 15.3-28.7
Somewhat hindered 9.4 4.5-14.3
Greatly hindered 4.2 1.0-7.5
No opinion 21.2 14.4-28.0
Not checked 3.6 0.4-6.8

Technical expertise of staff in other USG agencies

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 27.2 19.5-34.9
Somewhat helped 20.7 14.0-27.5
No effect 18.7 12.3-25.1
Somewhat hindered 6.4 2.7-10.2
Greatly hindered 1.1 0.0-2.5
No opinion 23.7 16.5-30.9
Not checked 2.0 0.0-4.6

Clarity of instructions from various management levels within your agency with HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 24.6 17.3-32.0
Somewhat helped 26.2 18.7-33.7
No effect 19.2 12.6-25.8
Somewhat hindered 10.2 5.6-14.8
Greatly hindered 6.4 2.7-10.2
No opinion 9.7 4.4-15.0
Not checked 3.6 0.4-6.8

Clarity of FtF roles and responsibilities with HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 24.6 17.3-32.0
Somewhat helped 25.9 18.6-33.2
No effect 14.0 8.3-19.7
Somewhat hindered 15.7 9.6-21.7
Greatly hindered 4.4 1.6-7.2
No opinion 13.4 7.3-19.4
Not checked 2.0 0.0-4.6

Amount of funding effect with HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 24.1 16.9-31.4
Somewhat helped 9.8 4.8-14.8
No effect 20.5 13.9-27.0
Somewhat hindered 12.5 7.0-18.0
Greatly hindered 15.7 9.6-21.7
No opinion 15.4 9.0-21.7
Not checked 2.0 0.0-4.6

Flexibility of funding effect with HQ

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 13.4 7.7-19.0
Somewhat helped 10.9 5.8-16.1
No effect 24.5 17.4-31.6
Somewhat hindered 15.2 9.3-21.1
Greatly hindered 11.0 5.8-16.2
No opinion 23.0 15.6-30.4
Not checked 2.0 0.0-4.6

Consistency of funding

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 15.4 9.3-21.5
Somewhat helped 9.2 4.2-14.3
No effect 18.9 12.6-25.2
Somewhat hindered 13.1 7.7-18.6
Greatly hindered 16.2 9.9-22.4
No opinion 23.6 16.3-30.9
Not checked 3.6 0.4-6.8

Required reporting to headquarters

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 11.8 6.4-17.2
Somewhat helped 6.7 2.5-10.9
No effect 36.5 28.4-44.6
Somewhat hindered 16.1 9.9-22.3
Greatly hindered 3.7 1.0-6.5
No opinion 21.5 14.5-28.6
Not checked 3.6 0.4-6.8

Timeliness of procurement approval process

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 11.3 6.1-16.5
Somewhat helped 4.1 0.5-7.7
No effect 29.7 22.1-37.3
Somewhat hindered 13.1 7.7-18.6
Greatly hindered 7.8 3.4-12.3
No opinion 28.3 20.6-36.0
Not checked 5.6 1.6-9.7

Other factor

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Somewhat helped 2.0 0.0-4.6
No effect 5.6 1.6-9.7
No opinion 19.8 13.0-26.5
Not checked 72.6 64.9-80.2

42a. If other factor, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Section 4: Consultation with stakeholder groups

4A. Host country government stakeholders

43. Do the stakeholders in any of the FtF-related activities you are planning or implementing in _____ include host country government representatives?

Stakeholders are those who are affected by a development outcome or have an interest in a development outcome.

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes, host country government representatives are stakeholders. 76.3 70.5-82.0
No, host country government representatives are not stakeholders. 15.1 10.3-20.0
Not checked 8.6 4.8-12.3

44. Which of the following host country government stakeholders have been involved in any of the FtF-related activities you are planning or implementing in _____?

(View question)

National election officials as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 63.3 55.8-70.8
Not a stakeholder 12.4 7.5-17.2
Not applicable 13.5 8.3-18.7
Not checked 10.8 5.8-15.8

Agricultural agency or ministry as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 86.6 81.0-92.2
Not a stakeholder 1.8 0.0-4.0
Not applicable 4.5 1.2-7.7
Not checked 7.1 2.8-11.5

Finance agency or ministry as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 60.8 53.1-68.5
Not a stakeholder 12.7 7.5-17.8
Not applicable 12.7 7.5-17.8
Not checked 13.9 8.3-19.5

Health agency or ministry as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 66.9 59.6-74.3
Not a stakeholder 10.4 5.9-15.0
Not applicable 10.5 5.8-15.1
Not checked 12.1 6.9-17.4

National Food Security coordinating body as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 45.3 37.4-53.1
Not a stakeholder 5.4 2.0-8.9
Not applicable 30.1 22.8-37.4
Not checked 19.2 12.8-25.6

Other executive branch agency or ministry as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 22.5 15.8-29.1
Not a stakeholder 3.7 1.0-6.3
Not applicable 31.6 24.3-38.9
Not checked 42.3 34.4-50.1

Regional elected officials as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 49.1 41.2-57.0
Not a stakeholder 13.2 8.0-18.4
Not applicable 24.7 17.9-31.5
Not checked 13.0 7.5-18.4

Regional government as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 69.3 62.1-76.6
Not a stakeholder 5.9 2.1-9.6
Not applicable 15.3 9.8-20.9
Not checked 9.4 4.7-14.2

Other regional stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 10.0 5.3-14.7
Not a stakeholder 5.4 2.0-8.9
Not applicable 38.7 31.0-46.4
Not checked 45.9 38.0-53.8

Local elected officials as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 54.3 46.5-62.2
Not a stakeholder 9.1 4.8-13.5
Not applicable 25.7 18.9-32.6
Not checked 10.8 5.8-15.8

Local government as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 68.8 61.5-76.1
Not a stakeholder 5.0 1.8-8.3
Not applicable 17.7 11.8-23.6
Not checked 8.5 3.8-13.1

Other Local stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 13.1 7.8-18.4
Not a stakeholder 3.3 0.8-5.7
Not applicable 30.7 23.4-37.9
Not checked 53.0 45.1-60.9

44a. If other host country government stakeholder(s), please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


45. Who identified to you those host country government stakeholders involved in any of the FtF activities-related you are planning or implementing in _____?

(View question)

Host government identified by host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 63.2 55.5-70.9
Did not identify stakeholders 9.1 4.8-13.4
Don't know 12.6 7.2-17.9
Not checked 15.2 9.2-21.1

Host government identified by USG employees

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 85.3 79.5-91.1
Did not identify stakeholders 4.5 1.2-7.7
Don't know 4.9 1.4-8.5
Not checked 5.3 1.5-9.2

Host government identified by private sources

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 58.7 50.9-66.6
Did not identify stakeholders 14.9 9.5-20.3
Don't know 14.7 8.9-20.5
Not checked 11.6 6.3-16.9

Host government identified by other

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 1.3 0.0-3.1
Did not identify stakeholders 4.9 1.4-8.5
Don't know 16.9 10.7-23.2
Not checked 76.8 69.9-83.7

45a. If other, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


46. About how often do you participate in each of the following with those host country government stakeholders to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Meetings with host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 3.7 1.0-6.3
Monthly 26.5 19.5-33.5
Quarterly 31.5 24.1-38.9
Yearly 8.7 4.5-13.0
Less than once per year 9.0 4.4-13.6
Not at all 13.9 8.3-19.4
Not checked 6.7 2.5-10.8

Working groups with host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 2.7 0.3-5.1
Monthly 6.4 2.7-10.0
Quarterly 31.0 23.7-38.4
Yearly 16.0 10.3-21.6
Less than once per year 6.3 2.3-10.3
Not at all 30.5 23.1-37.8
Not checked 7.1 2.8-11.5

Conferences with host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 2.7 0.2-5.3
Quarterly 21.2 14.8-27.6
Yearly 23.6 17.0-30.2
Less than once per year 12.6 7.2-17.9
Not at all 32.8 25.3-40.2
Not checked 7.1 2.8-11.5

Training with host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 1.0 0.0-2.2
Quarterly 12.7 7.8-17.7
Yearly 11.4 6.7-16.2
Less than once per year 13.0 7.5-18.4
Not at all 53.4 45.5-61.3
Not checked 8.5 3.8-13.1

Site visits with host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 8.1 4.0-12.3
Quarterly 26.1 19.0-33.1
Yearly 17.1 11.5-22.7
Less than once per year 9.0 4.5-13.5
Not at all 32.6 25.2-40.1
Not checked 7.1 2.8-11.5

Progress reports with host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 3.1 0.3-5.9
Monthly 11.3 6.4-16.1
Quarterly 14.0 8.6-19.4
Yearly 22.3 15.8-28.8
Less than once per year 9.0 4.4-13.7
Not at all 34.9 27.4-42.5
Not checked 5.3 1.5-9.2

Other action with host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Quarterly 1.3 0.0-3.1
Not at all 24.6 17.6-31.6
Not checked 74.1 66.9-81.2

46a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


47. Which of the following types of assistance has your agency provided to host country government representatives to support their CONSULTATIONS with other stakeholders in _____ regarding FtF-related programs or projects?

Stakeholder consultations refer to those activities where stakeholders (a) are informed about a proposed project through public meetings or similar methods, (b) are given reasonable opportunities to express their concerns or suggestions in meetings with project sponsors, (c) have public or stakeholder concerns taken into account in final project plan, and (d) are provided access to project information and subsequent opportunities to review and comment on the progress or final reports. Stakeholder consultations are sometimes also referred to as "public consultations" or "public participation."

(View question)

Consultation meetings with host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 61.2 53.5-68.9
Did not provide 19.4 13.3-25.6
Do not know 14.8 9.2-20.4
Not checked 4.5 1.2-7.9

Funding to build host government's capacity to engage in stakeholder consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 21.7 15.2-28.3
Did not provide 55.0 47.1-62.9
Do not know 18.0 11.9-24.0
Not checked 5.3 1.5-9.2

Technical assistance or research data to host government to support stakeholder consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 34.1 26.7-41.4
Did not provide 39.1 31.3-46.8
Do not know 19.7 13.4-26.1
Not checked 7.1 2.8-11.5

Policy or diplomatic support to host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 49.5 41.6-57.4
Did not provide 29.0 22.1-35.9
Do not know 18.0 11.9-24.0
Not checked 3.6 0.4-6.7

Directly hosted consultation event(s) for host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 41.9 34.0-49.7
Did not provide 35.2 27.7-42.7
Do not know 18.8 12.5-25.1
Not checked 4.1 1.0-7.1

Other assistance for host government consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 1.8 0.0-4.0
Did not provide 9.1 4.8-13.4
Do not know 25.6 18.5-32.6
Not checked 63.6 55.9-71.2

47a. If other assistance, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


48. Which of the following types of assistance has your agency provided to host country government stakeholders to facilitate FtF-related PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS in _____?

Public-private partnerships are those between government agencies and either for-profit or non-profit organizations.

Partners are organizations or individuals with which/whom the Agency collaborates to achieve mutually agreed upon objectives and to secure participation of ultimate customers. Partners include host country governments, private voluntary organizations, civil society organizations (CSOs), indigenous and international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), universities, other U.S. government agencies, United Nations and other multilateral organizations, professional and business associations, and private businesses and individuals.

(View question)

Identified potential partners to host government officials

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 52.4 44.5-60.4
Did not provide 20.7 14.5-26.9
Do not know 22.0 15.3-28.6
Not checked 4.9 1.4-8.5

Funded partnerships for host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 19.7 13.6-25.9
Did not provide 49.0 41.1-56.9
Do not know 26.3 19.2-33.5
Not checked 4.9 1.4-8.5

Funding to build capacity of host government to enter into a public-private partnership

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 23.2 16.6-29.8
Did not provide 45.4 37.5-53.3
Do not know 25.5 18.5-32.6
Not checked 5.9 2.1-9.6

Technical assistance to host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 29.2 22.2-36.2
Did not provide 34.6 27.2-42.1
Do not know 32.6 25.0-40.2
Not checked 3.6 0.4-6.7

Directly hosted an event to facilitate partnership with host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 45.0 37.0-52.9
Did not provide 32.1 24.9-39.3
Do not know 19.2 12.8-25.6
Not checked 3.7 0.9-6.5

Other assistance for host government partnerships

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 1.8 0.0-4.0
Did not provide 15.7 10.1-21.3
Do not know 20.2 13.7-26.7
Not checked 62.3 54.6-70.0

48a. If other assistance, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


49. As a result of the coordination efforts with those host country government stakeholders, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Integration of host country governments' key priorities and needs when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 45.3 37.4-53.2
Remained about the same 22.4 16.0-28.8
Don't know/ too soon to tell 27.9 20.8-34.9
Not checked 4.5 1.2-7.7

Formation of partnerships that included host country government when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 46.8 38.9-54.7
Remained about the same 16.4 10.6-22.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 30.6 23.3-37.9
Not checked 6.3 2.4-10.2

Amounts of budgeting or funding with host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 18.4 12.2-24.6
Remained about the same 29.9 22.7-37.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 42.7 34.9-50.5
Not checked 9.0 4.4-13.6

Integration of budgeting or funding with host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 30.6 23.2-37.9
Remained about the same 21.8 15.4-28.3
Decreased 1.3 0.0-3.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 39.0 31.3-46.8
Not checked 7.2 3.2-11.3

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities with host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 22.1 15.5-28.7
Remained about the same 27.2 20.2-34.2
Decreased 1.8 0.0-4.0
Don't know/ too soon to tell 42.7 34.9-50.5
Not checked 6.3 2.4-10.2

Diversity of funding sources with host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 19.1 13.0-25.2
Remained about the same 23.9 17.1-30.7
Decreased 1.3 0.0-3.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 46.6 38.7-54.5
Not checked 9.0 4.4-13.6

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 21.3 14.8-27.7
Remained about the same 25.8 18.9-32.7
Decreased 3.1 0.3-5.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 40.4 32.6-48.2
Not checked 9.4 4.7-14.1

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 17.0 11.0-23.1
Remained about the same 26.9 20.0-33.8
Decreased 3.7 1.0-6.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 47.9 40.0-55.9
Not checked 4.5 1.2-7.7

Host government commitment to FtF project objectives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 35.5 27.9-43.2
Remained about the same 16.9 11.2-22.6
Don't know/ too soon to tell 41.8 34.0-49.6
Not checked 5.8 2.2-9.5

Host government involvement in FtF project implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 37.8 30.1-45.6
Remained about the same 18.7 12.7-24.6
Don't know/ too soon to tell 37.7 30.0-45.4
Not checked 5.8 2.2-9.5

Host government capacity to participate in FtF planning or implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 29.2 21.9-36.5
Remained about the same 24.5 17.9-31.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 36.9 29.2-44.5
Not checked 9.4 4.7-14.1

Host government engagement with other FtF project partners (e.g., donors, private sector, NGOs, civil society)

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 35.5 27.9-43.2
Remained about the same 19.2 13.2-25.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 37.7 30.0-45.4
Not checked 7.6 3.4-11.8

Other outcome with host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Remained about the same 1.8 0.0-4.0
Don't know/ too soon to tell 24.2 17.2-31.1
Not checked 74.1 66.9-81.2

49a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Section 4B. Non-profit stakeholders

50. Do the stakeholders in any of the FtF-related activities you are planning or implementing in _____ include non-profit stakeholders?

Stakeholders are those who are affected by a development outcome or have an interest in a development outcome.

Non-profit organizations refer to organizations that are operated primarily for service, charitable, scientific, educational or other similar purposes; are not organized for profit; and use their net proceeds to maintain, improve, and/or expand operations. Non-profit organizations include private voluntary organizations, civil society organizations, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, and trusts, among others.

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes, there are non-profit stakeholders. 57.5 50.7-64.2
No, there are no non-profit stakeholders. 30.2 23.9-36.4
Not checked 12.3 7.8-16.8

51. Which of the following are non-profit stakeholders involved in any of the FtF-related activities you are planning or implementing in _____?

(View question)

National non-profit service provider as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 73.1 64.9-81.2
Not a stakeholder 9.1 3.9-14.2
Not applicable 13.0 6.6-19.4
Not checked 4.8 1.3-8.4

National advocacy organization(s) as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 54.4 45.3-63.4
Not a stakeholder 24.8 17.1-32.5
Not applicable 14.2 7.8-20.7
Not checked 6.6 2.4-10.8

National civil society organization(s) as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 64.3 55.8-72.9
Not a stakeholder 18.9 12.3-25.6
Not applicable 11.9 6.0-17.8
Not checked 4.8 1.3-8.4

National professional or trade association(s) or unions as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 57.9 49.0-66.9
Not a stakeholder 18.2 11.5-25.0
Not applicable 16.6 9.7-23.6
Not checked 7.2 2.6-11.8

National research organization(s) as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 67.6 59.2-76.0
Not a stakeholder 11.5 6.1-17.0
Not applicable 10.1 4.5-15.7
Not checked 10.8 5.3-16.3

National racial or ethnic community-based organization(s) (ECBOs) stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 5.4 1.4-9.5
Not a stakeholder 42.8 33.9-51.8
Not applicable 41.0 31.8-50.1
Not checked 10.8 5.3-16.3

Other national non-profit as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 4.8 1.3-8.4
Not a stakeholder 15.1 8.9-21.3
Not applicable 34.4 25.6-43.3
Not checked 45.6 36.5-54.7

Regional non-profit service provider as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 76.4 68.8-84.1
Not a stakeholder 8.7 4.1-13.3
Not applicable 9.5 3.7-15.2
Not checked 5.4 1.5-9.3

Regional advocacy organization(s) as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 51.2 42.1-60.4
Not a stakeholder 20.7 13.8-27.7
Not applicable 17.8 10.5-25.1
Not checked 10.3 5.0-15.6

Regional civil society organization(s) as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 62.9 54.3-71.6
Not a stakeholder 19.7 13.0-26.4
Not applicable 10.2 4.5-15.8
Not checked 7.2 2.6-11.8

Regional professional or trade association(s) or unions as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 45.9 36.8-55.1
Not a stakeholder 20.8 13.8-27.8
Not applicable 19.6 12.0-27.1
Not checked 13.7 7.4-20.1

Regional research organization(s) as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 47.3 38.1-56.4
Not a stakeholder 19.5 12.7-26.4
Not applicable 21.3 13.6-29.0
Not checked 11.9 6.0-17.8

Regional racial or ethnic community-based organization(s) (ECBOs) stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 7.8 2.8-12.7
Not a stakeholder 38.7 29.9-47.5
Not applicable 36.2 27.3-45.2
Not checked 17.3 10.4-24.2

Other Regional non-profit as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 4.3 1.1-7.6
Not a stakeholder 18.2 11.5-25.0
Not applicable 32.1 23.3-40.8
Not checked 45.3 36.2-54.5

INGO as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 53.3 44.2-62.5
Not a stakeholder 1.3 0.0-2.9
Not applicable 7.8 2.8-12.7
Not checked 37.6 28.7-46.5

51a. If other non-profit stakeholder(s), please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


52. Who identified to you those non-profit stakeholders involved in any of the FtF activities-related you are planning or implementing in _____?

(View question)

Non-profit stakeholders identified by host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 55.2 46.1-64.3
Did not identify stakeholders 24.1 16.3-31.8
Don't know 15.4 8.5-22.3
Not checked 5.4 1.5-9.3

Non-profit stakeholders identified by USG employees

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 88.0 81.9-94.1
Did not identify stakeholders 7.3 2.6-12.0
Don't know 4.7 0.5-8.9

Non-profit stakeholders identified by private sources

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 75.6 67.6-83.6
Did not identify stakeholders 7.8 2.8-12.7
Don't know 13.0 6.6-19.4
Not checked 3.6 0.4-6.8

Non-profit stakeholders self-identified

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 52.2 43.1-61.4
Did not identify stakeholders 18.6 11.6-25.6
Don't know 24.9 16.6-33.1
Not checked 4.3 1.1-7.6

Non-profit stakeholders identified by other

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 1.8 0.0-4.1
Did not identify stakeholders 5.9 1.6-10.3
Don't know 20.4 12.8-27.9
Not checked 71.9 63.6-80.2

52a. If other, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


53. About how often do you participate in each of the following with those non-profit stakeholders to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Meetings with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 4.8 1.3-8.4
Monthly 14.5 8.2-20.8
Quarterly 40.0 31.0-49.1
Yearly 6.7 2.4-11.0
Less than once per year 11.9 5.9-18.0
Not at all 22.0 14.4-29.6

Working groups with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 8.4 3.7-13.1
Quarterly 23.6 15.9-31.2
Yearly 16.2 9.3-23.0
Less than once per year 14.3 7.8-20.9
Not at all 35.8 27.0-44.6
Not checked 1.8 0.0-4.1

Conferences with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 1.3 0.0-2.9
Quarterly 13.7 7.4-20.1
Yearly 28.2 20.0-36.4
Less than once per year 23.4 15.6-31.2
Not at all 28.0 19.7-36.3
Not checked 5.4 1.5-9.3

Training with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Quarterly 17.9 11.2-24.7
Yearly 11.4 5.6-17.1
Less than once per year 16.2 9.3-23.0
Not at all 51.5 42.3-60.6
Not checked 3.1 0.3-5.9

Site visits with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 4.8 1.3-8.4
Quarterly 36.5 27.7-45.3
Yearly 23.0 15.5-30.6
Less than once per year 10.1 4.5-15.7
Not at all 23.7 15.7-31.7
Not checked 1.8 0.0-4.1

Progress reports with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 5.4 1.4-9.5
Quarterly 28.1 19.8-36.4
Yearly 19.3 12.3-26.4
Less than once per year 9.1 3.9-14.2
Not at all 32.7 24.0-41.4
Not checked 5.4 1.5-9.3

Other action with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 1.8 0.0-4.1
Not at all 31.7 23.1-40.2
Not checked 66.5 57.9-75.2

53a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


54. Which of the following types of assistance has your agency provided to non-profit stakeholders to support their CONSULTATIONS with other stakeholders in _____ regarding FtF-related programs or projects?

Stakeholder consultations refer to those activities where stakeholders (a) are informed about a proposed project through public meetings or similar methods, (b) are given reasonable opportunities to express their concerns or suggestions in meetings with project sponsors, (c) have public or stakeholder concerns taken into account in final project plan, and (d) are provided access to project information and subsequent opportunities to review and comment on the progress or final reports. Stakeholder consultations are sometimes also referred to as "public consultations" or "public participation."

(View question)

Consultation meetings with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 53.0 43.9-62.2
Did not provide 16.6 9.7-23.6
Do not know 21.3 13.6-29.0
Not checked 9.0 3.9-14.1

Funding to build non-profit stakeholders capacity to engage in stakeholder consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 19.6 12.7-26.5
Did not provide 41.7 32.7-50.8
Do not know 29.7 21.2-38.3
Not checked 9.0 3.9-14.1

Technical assistance or research data to non-profit stakeholders to support stakeholder consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 39.4 30.6-48.2
Did not provide 32.2 23.6-40.8
Do not know 22.5 14.5-30.5
Not checked 5.9 1.6-10.3

Policy or diplomatic support to non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 36.1 27.3-44.9
Did not provide 33.5 25.0-42.1
Do not know 23.7 15.7-31.7
Not checked 6.6 2.4-10.8

Directly hosted consultation event(s) for non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 44.5 35.4-53.6
Did not provide 26.4 18.4-34.4
Do not know 24.3 16.1-32.4
Not checked 4.8 1.3-8.4

Other assistance for non-profit stakeholders consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 2.4 0.0-5.4
Did not provide 8.3 3.1-13.5
Do not know 29.4 21.0-37.8
Not checked 60.0 50.9-69.0

54a. If other assistance, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


55. Which of the following types of assistance has your agency provided to non-profit stakeholders to facilitate FtF-related PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS in _____?

Public-private partnerships are those between government agencies and either for-profit or non-profit organizations.

Partners are organizations or individuals with which/whom the Agency collaborates to achieve mutually agreed upon objectives and to secure participation of ultimate customers. Partners include host country governments, private voluntary organizations, civil society organizations (CSOs), indigenous and international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), universities, other U.S. government agencies, United Nations and other multilateral organizations, professional and business associations, and private businesses and individuals.

(View question)

Identified potential partners to non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 51.1 41.9-60.2
Did not provide 25.8 17.9-33.7
Do not know 17.8 10.5-25.1
Not checked 5.4 1.5-9.3

Funded partnerships for non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 19.0 12.3-25.7
Did not provide 49.5 40.4-58.6
Do not know 20.1 12.5-27.8
Not checked 11.4 5.6-17.1

Funding to build capacity of non-profit stakeholders to enter into a public-private partnership

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 20.9 13.8-27.9
Did not provide 50.7 41.6-59.9
Do not know 20.1 12.5-27.8
Not checked 8.3 3.1-13.5

Technical assistance to non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 33.3 24.8-41.7
Did not provide 44.8 35.7-53.9
Do not know 16.0 8.9-23.1
Not checked 5.9 1.6-10.3

Directly hosted an event to facilitate partnership with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 39.5 30.5-48.4
Did not provide 37.9 29.1-46.7
Do not know 13.6 7.0-20.2
Not checked 9.0 3.9-14.1

Other assistance for non-profit stakeholders partnerships

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Did not provide 22.7 15.1-30.3
Do not know 25.0 16.9-33.2
Not checked 52.2 43.1-61.4

55a. If other assistance, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


56. As a result of the coordination efforts with those non-profit stakeholders, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Integration of non-profit stakeholders key priorities and needs when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 45.5 36.3-54.6
Remained about the same 22.4 15.0-29.8
Don't know/ too soon to tell 24.4 16.4-32.4
Not checked 7.7 2.9-12.6

Formation of partnerships that included non-profit stakeholders when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 44.2 35.1-53.3
Remained about the same 20.6 13.5-27.8
Don't know/ too soon to tell 29.3 20.9-37.6
Not checked 5.9 1.6-10.3

Amounts of budgeting or funding with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 24.6 16.8-32.5
Remained about the same 28.4 20.3-36.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 41.0 32.0-50.1
Not checked 5.9 1.6-10.3

Integration of budgeting or funding with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 27.0 18.9-35.2
Remained about the same 25.3 17.5-33.2
Decreased 1.8 0.0-4.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 39.9 30.9-48.9
Not checked 5.9 1.6-10.3

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 15.6 8.9-22.3
Remained about the same 31.5 23.2-39.9
Decreased 4.2 0.4-7.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 40.4 31.4-49.5
Not checked 8.3 3.1-13.5

Diversity of funding sources with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 17.4 10.4-24.3
Remained about the same 36.8 28.0-45.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 36.3 27.4-45.1
Not checked 9.6 4.2-14.9

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 15.6 8.9-22.3
Remained about the same 35.7 27.0-44.3
Decreased 4.2 0.4-7.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 35.0 26.2-43.8
Not checked 9.6 4.2-14.9

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 14.3 7.8-20.9
Remained about the same 34.6 26.1-43.1
Decreased 1.8 0.0-4.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 43.4 34.3-52.5
Not checked 5.9 1.6-10.3

Non-profit stakeholders commitment to FtF project objectives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 40.0 31.0-49.1
Remained about the same 17.7 11.2-24.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 33.9 25.2-42.6
Not checked 8.3 3.1-13.5

Non-profit stakeholders involvement in FtF project implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 45.5 36.3-54.6
Remained about the same 17.0 10.4-23.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 31.6 23.0-40.1
Not checked 5.9 1.6-10.3

Non-profit stakeholders capacity to participate in FtF planning or implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 30.4 21.9-38.9
Remained about the same 25.0 17.4-32.6
Don't know/ too soon to tell 33.9 25.2-42.6
Not checked 10.7 4.8-16.5

Non-profit stakeholders engagement with other FtF project partners

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 38.8 29.8-47.8
Remained about the same 21.4 14.2-28.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 33.9 25.2-42.6
Not checked 5.9 1.6-10.3

Other outcome with non-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Remained about the same 5.4 1.4-9.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 29.9 21.4-38.3
Not checked 64.7 55.9-73.5

56a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Section 4C. For-profit stakeholders

57. Do the stakeholders in any of the FtF-related activities you are planning or implementing in _____ include for-profit stakeholders?

Stakeholders are those who are affected by a development outcome or have an interest in a development outcome.

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes, there are for-profit stakeholders. 45.4 38.6-52.2
No, there are no for-profit stakeholders. 40.8 34.1-47.6
Not checked 13.8 9.2-18.4

58. Which of the following are for-profit stakeholders involved in any of the FtF-related activities you are planning or implementing in _____?

(View question)

Multinational corporations as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 60.7 50.6-70.8
Not a stakeholder 17.5 10.0-25.1
Not applicable 10.5 4.0-17.0
Not checked 11.2 4.4-18.1

National agricultural processors or traders as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 72.2 62.8-81.5
Not a stakeholder 9.1 3.4-14.7
Not applicable 13.5 6.2-20.8
Not checked 5.3 0.5-10.0

National agricultural producer organizations as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 72.2 62.8-81.5
Not a stakeholder 9.1 3.4-14.7
Not applicable 13.5 6.2-20.8
Not checked 5.3 0.5-10.0

National financial sector providers or associations as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 53.1 42.7-63.5
Not a stakeholder 20.5 12.4-28.7
Not applicable 15.8 8.0-23.7
Not checked 10.5 4.0-17.0

Local or regional agricultural processors or traders as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 74.4 65.2-83.5
Not a stakeholder 6.1 1.6-10.7
Not applicable 17.2 9.0-25.5
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Local or regional agricultural producer organizations as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 80.4 72.1-88.6
Not a stakeholder 3.9 0.3-7.4
Not applicable 13.5 6.2-20.8
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Local or regional financial sector providers or associations as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 55.4 45.0-65.7
Not a stakeholder 16.9 9.5-24.2
Not applicable 17.2 9.0-25.5
Not checked 10.5 4.0-17.0

Other for-profit stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 5.3 0.5-10.0
Not a stakeholder 2.3 0.0-5.2
Not applicable 19.1 10.9-27.2
Not checked 73.4 64.2-82.6

58a. If other for-profit stakeholder(s), please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


59. Who identified to you those for-profit stakeholders involved in any of the FtF activities-related you are planning or implementing in _____?

(View question)

For-profit stakeholders identified by host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 59.0 48.8-69.2
Did not identify stakeholders 22.9 14.3-31.4
Don't know 12.9 5.7-20.0
Not checked 5.3 0.5-10.0

For-profit stakeholdersidentified by USG employees

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 67.6 57.8-77.3
Did not identify stakeholders 12.8 5.8-19.8
Don't know 7.6 1.9-13.2
Not checked 12.0 5.4-18.7

For-profit stakeholders identified by private sources

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 72.1 62.7-81.5
Did not identify stakeholders 12.8 5.8-19.8
Don't know 12.9 5.7-20.0
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

For-profit stakeholders self-identified

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 70.6 60.8-80.3
Did not identify stakeholders 9.0 2.6-15.4
Don't know 13.6 6.1-21.0
Not checked 6.9 1.7-12.0

For-profit stakeholders identified by other

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 2.3 0.0-5.2
Did not identify stakeholders 2.3 0.0-5.2
Don't know 15.8 8.0-23.7
Not checked 79.6 71.1-88.1

59a. If other, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


60. About how often do you participate in each of the following with those for-profit stakeholders to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Meetings with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 6.0 0.7-11.3
Monthly 15.3 8.1-22.6
Quarterly 42.2 31.9-52.5
Yearly 13.1 6.3-19.9
Less than once per year 8.3 2.3-14.2
Not at all 10.6 3.9-17.2
Not checked 4.5 0.4-8.6

Working groups with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 6.0 0.7-11.3
Monthly 3.0 0.0-6.8
Quarterly 18.3 10.4-26.1
Yearly 19.2 11.4-27.1
Less than once per year 16.5 8.5-24.5
Not at all 32.5 22.7-42.3
Not checked 4.5 0.4-8.6

Conferences with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 3.0 0.0-6.8
Monthly 3.0 0.0-6.8
Quarterly 11.4 5.0-17.8
Yearly 32.0 22.5-41.5
Less than once per year 19.5 10.9-28.1
Not at all 26.6 17.4-35.8
Not checked 4.5 0.4-8.6

Training with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 3.0 0.0-6.8
Monthly 3.0 0.0-6.8
Quarterly 11.3 5.1-17.6
Yearly 14.5 7.8-21.3
Less than once per year 12.2 5.3-19.1
Not at all 48.4 38.0-58.8
Not checked 7.5 2.0-13.0

Site visits with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 3.0 0.0-6.8
Monthly 7.5 2.0-13.0
Quarterly 28.9 19.5-38.2
Yearly 26.7 17.8-35.7
Less than once per year 11.2 4.4-18.1
Not at all 20.4 11.9-28.9
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Progress reports with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Weekly 3.0 0.0-6.8
Monthly 3.0 0.0-6.8
Quarterly 18.3 10.4-26.1
Yearly 26.5 17.4-35.6
Less than once per year 9.9 3.6-16.1
Not at all 37.1 27.0-47.2
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Other action with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yearly 3.0 0.0-6.8
Not at all 14.5 7.1-21.8
Not checked 82.5 74.5-90.5

60a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


61. Which of the following types of assistance has your agency provided to for-profit stakeholders to support their CONSULTATIONS with other stakeholders in _____ regarding FtF-related programs or projects?

Stakeholder consultations refer to those activities where stakeholders (a) are informed about a proposed project through public meetings or similar methods, (b) are given reasonable opportunities to express their concerns or suggestions in meetings with project sponsors, (c) have public or stakeholder concerns taken into account in final project plan, and (d) are provided access to project information and subsequent opportunities to review and comment on the progress or final reports. Stakeholder consultations are sometimes also referred to as "public consultations" or "public participation."

(View question)

Consultation meetings with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 74.4 65.2-83.5
Did not provide 6.1 1.6-10.7
Do not know 14.2 6.6-21.9
Not checked 5.3 0.5-10.0

Funding to build for-profit stakeholders capacity to engage in stakeholder consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 21.3 12.9-29.7
Did not provide 53.3 42.9-63.7
Do not know 23.2 14.0-32.4
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Technical assistance or research data to for-profit stakeholders to support stakeholder consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 37.4 27.6-47.3
Did not provide 34.1 24.3-44.0
Do not know 20.2 11.5-29.0
Not checked 8.3 2.3-14.2

Policy or diplomatic support to for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 40.9 30.6-51.2
Did not provide 37.3 27.5-47.2
Do not know 19.5 10.9-28.1
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Directly hosted consultation event(s) for for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 53.8 43.5-64.2
Did not provide 23.7 15.2-32.1
Do not know 17.2 9.0-25.5
Not checked 5.3 0.5-10.0

Other assistance for for-profit stakeholders consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 5.3 0.5-10.0
Did not provide 7.5 2.0-13.0
Do not know 22.1 13.4-30.8
Not checked 65.2 55.2-75.1

61a. If other assistance, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


62. Which of the following types of assistance has your agency provided to for-profit stakeholders to facilitate FtF-related PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS in _____?

Public-private partnerships are those between government agencies and either for-profit or non-profit organizations.

Partners are organizations or individuals with which/whom the Agency collaborates to achieve mutually agreed upon objectives and to secure participation of ultimate customers. Partners include host country governments, private voluntary organizations, civil society organizations (CSOs), indigenous and international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), universities, other U.S. government agencies, United Nations and other multilateral organizations, professional and business associations, and private businesses and individuals.

(View question)

Identified potential partners to for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 65.0 55.2-74.8
Did not provide 13.2 6.9-19.5
Do not know 16.5 8.5-24.5
Not checked 5.3 0.5-10.0

Funded partnerships for for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 19.9 11.9-27.9
Did not provide 49.4 39.0-59.8
Do not know 25.5 16.1-34.9
Not checked 5.3 0.5-10.0

Funding to build capacity of for-profit stakeholders to enter into a public-private partnership

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 18.3 10.4-26.3
Did not provide 51.6 41.3-62.0
Do not know 27.7 18.2-37.3
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Technical assistance to for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 35.2 25.5-45.0
Did not provide 28.0 18.9-37.2
Do not know 31.5 21.5-41.5
Not checked 5.3 0.5-10.0

Directly hosted an event to facilitate partnership with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 47.5 37.1-58.0
Did not provide 30.7 21.6-39.8
Do not know 19.5 10.9-28.1
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Other assistance for for-profit stakeholders partnerships

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 3.0 0.0-6.8
Did not provide 12.9 6.4-19.5
Do not know 25.7 16.5-35.0
Not checked 58.4 48.1-68.6

62a. If other assistance, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


63. As a result of the coordination efforts with those for-profit stakeholders, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Integration of for-profit stakeholders key priorities and needs when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 42.1 31.8-52.5
Remained about the same 24.0 15.7-32.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 31.6 21.8-41.4
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Formation of partnerships that included for-profit stakeholders when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 44.4 34.0-54.8
Remained about the same 17.8 10.5-25.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 35.5 25.5-45.5
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Amounts of budgeting or funding with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 22.5 13.5-31.5
Remained about the same 29.2 20.2-38.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 40.8 30.5-51.0
Not checked 7.5 2.0-13.0

Integration of budgeting or funding with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 22.5 13.5-31.5
Remained about the same 30.0 20.8-39.2
Decreased 2.3 0.0-5.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 43.0 32.7-53.3
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 16.5 8.5-24.5
Remained about the same 30.7 21.3-40.1
Decreased 5.3 0.5-10.0
Don't know/ too soon to tell 43.0 32.7-53.3
Not checked 4.5 0.4-8.6

Diversity of funding sources with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 26.4 17.0-35.7
Remained about the same 27.5 18.3-36.6
Don't know/ too soon to tell 42.3 32.0-52.6
Not checked 3.9 0.3-7.4

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 19.5 10.9-28.1
Remained about the same 30.7 21.3-40.1
Decreased 7.5 2.0-13.0
Don't know/ too soon to tell 40.0 29.8-50.2
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 21.0 12.4-29.6
Remained about the same 24.7 16.2-33.2
Decreased 2.3 0.0-5.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 49.7 39.3-60.1
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

For-profit stakeholders commitment to FtF project objectives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 33.0 23.0-43.0
Remained about the same 30.0 20.8-39.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 34.8 24.8-44.7
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

For-profit stakeholders involvement in FtF project implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 33.9 23.9-43.8
Remained about the same 26.1 17.3-34.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 36.1 26.1-46.2
Not checked 3.9 0.3-7.4

For-profit stakeholders capacity to participate in FtF planning or implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 31.6 21.8-41.4
Remained about the same 26.1 17.3-34.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 37.8 27.6-47.9
Not checked 4.5 0.4-8.6

For-profit stakeholders engagement with other FtF project partners

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 36.2 26.1-46.3
Remained about the same 23.8 15.3-32.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 37.7 27.6-47.8
Not checked 2.3 0.0-5.2

Other outcome with for-profit stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Remained about the same 5.3 0.5-10.0
Don't know/ too soon to tell 20.4 11.9-28.9
Not checked 74.4 65.2-83.5

63a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Section 4D. Donor stakeholders

64. Do the stakeholders in any of the FtF-related activities you are planning or implementing in _____ include non-U.S. donors?

Stakeholders are those who are affected by a development outcome or have an interest in a development outcome.

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Yes, there are non-US donor stakeholders. 37.0 30.4-43.7
No, there are no non-US donor stakeholders. 48.4 41.6-55.2
Not checked 14.5 9.8-19.2

65. Which of the following are donor stakeholders involved in any of the FtF-related activities you are planning or implementing in _____?

(View question)

Multilateral donors as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 91.7 85.6-97.8
Not a stakeholder 2.8 0.0-6.4
Not applicable 2.8 0.0-6.4
Not checked 2.8 0.0-6.4

Other bilateral donor countries as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 80.5 71.5-89.5
Not a stakeholder 4.8 0.3-9.2
Not applicable 12.0 4.5-19.5
Not checked 2.8 0.0-6.4

Private international donor organizations as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 59.1 47.5-70.7
Not a stakeholder 13.3 5.6-21.0
Not applicable 21.2 11.7-30.7
Not checked 6.4 0.6-12.3

In-country donors as stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 48.4 36.5-60.2
Not a stakeholder 15.8 7.1-24.5
Not applicable 22.1 12.3-31.9
Not checked 13.8 5.3-22.2

Other donor stakeholder

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Stakeholder 2.8 0.0-6.4
Not a stakeholder 2.8 0.0-6.4
Not applicable 30.6 19.7-41.5
Not checked 63.8 52.5-75.2

65a. If other donor stakeholder(s), please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


66. Who identified to you those donor stakeholders involved in any of the FtF activities-related you are planning or implementing in _____?

(View question)

Donor stakeholders identified by host government

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 56.5 44.7-68.3
Did not identify stakeholders 14.1 6.1-22.1
Don't know 23.0 12.9-33.1
Not checked 6.4 0.6-12.3

Donor stakeholders identified by USG employees

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 76.7 66.9-86.5
Don't know 14.9 6.6-23.2
Not checked 8.4 2.1-14.8

Donor stakeholders identified by private sources

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 43.0 31.3-54.7
Did not identify stakeholders 11.0 3.2-18.8
Don't know 28.5 17.8-39.3
Not checked 17.5 8.1-26.8

Donor stakeholders self-identified

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 74.1 63.6-84.6
Did not identify stakeholders 3.7 0.0-8.4
Don't know 13.8 5.3-22.2
Not checked 8.4 2.1-14.8

Donor stakeholders identified by other

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Identified stakeholders 2.8 0.0-6.4
Don't know 21.4 11.7-31.1
Not checked 75.8 65.7-85.9

66a. If other, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


67. About how often do you participate in each of the following with those donor stakeholders to plan or implement FtF-related activities in _____?

(View question)

Consultation meetings with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 13.8 5.3-22.2
Quarterly 37.1 25.6-48.5
Yearly 26.2 15.9-36.4
Less than once per year 7.3 0.8-13.9
Not at all 10.1 2.8-17.4
Not checked 5.5 0.5-10.6

Working groups with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 3.7 0.0-8.4
Quarterly 21.3 11.7-30.9
Yearly 24.5 14.6-34.3
Less than once per year 11.0 3.2-18.8
Not at all 30.3 19.3-41.4
Not checked 9.2 2.5-16.0

Conferences with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Quarterly 10.1 2.8-17.4
Yearly 46.4 34.5-58.2
Less than once per year 11.0 3.2-18.8
Not at all 27.0 16.5-37.4
Not checked 5.5 0.5-10.6

Training with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Quarterly 2.8 0.0-6.4
Yearly 18.5 9.3-27.7
Less than once per year 11.0 3.2-18.8
Not at all 58.5 46.7-70.2
Not checked 9.2 2.5-16.0

Site visits with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Quarterly 29.5 18.6-40.5
Yearly 30.7 19.7-41.7
Less than once per year 12.9 4.9-20.9
Not at all 24.1 14.1-34.1
Not checked 2.8 0.0-6.4

Progress reports with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Monthly 3.7 0.0-8.4
Quarterly 17.7 8.8-26.7
Yearly 23.0 12.9-33.1
Less than once per year 13.0 4.8-21.1
Not at all 36.2 24.8-47.5
Not checked 6.4 0.6-12.3

Other action with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Not at all 25.1 14.7-35.4
Not checked 74.9 64.6-85.3

67a. If other activity, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


68. Which of the following types of assistance has your agency provided to donor stakeholders to support their CONSULTATIONS with other stakeholders in _____ regarding FtF-related programs or projects?

Stakeholder consultations refer to those activities where stakeholders (a) are informed about a proposed project through public meetings or similar methods, (b) are given reasonable opportunities to express their concerns or suggestions in meetings with project sponsors, (c) have public or stakeholder concerns taken into account in final project plan, and (d) are provided access to project information and subsequent opportunities to review and comment on the progress or final reports. Stakeholder consultations are sometimes also referred to as "public consultations" or "public participation."

(View question)

Meetings (phone or in-person) to support donor consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 61.2 49.6-72.9
Did not provide 14.9 6.6-23.2
Do not know 13.8 5.3-22.2
Not checked 10.1 2.8-17.4

Funding to build donor stakeholders capacity to engage in stakeholder consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 2.0 0.0-4.6
Did not provide 64.0 52.5-75.5
Do not know 20.2 10.5-30.0
Not checked 13.8 5.3-22.2

Technical assistance or research data to donor stakeholders to support stakeholder consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 21.6 12.3-30.9
Did not provide 44.4 32.6-56.2
Do not know 20.2 10.5-30.0
Not checked 13.8 5.3-22.2

Policy or diplomatic support to donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 41.7 30.0-53.5
Did not provide 25.2 15.2-35.1
Do not know 23.0 12.9-33.1
Not checked 10.1 2.8-17.4

Directly hosted consultation event(s) for donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 33.2 21.9-44.5
Did not provide 30.0 19.5-40.5
Do not know 23.9 13.5-34.2
Not checked 12.9 4.9-20.9

Other assistance for donor stakeholders consultations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Did not provide 12.9 4.9-20.9
Do not know 29.8 19.0-40.6
Not checked 57.3 45.6-69.0

68a. If other assistance, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


69. Which of the following types of assistance has your agency provided to donor stakeholders to facilitate FtF-related PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS in _____?

Public-private partnerships are those between government agencies and either for-profit or non-profit organizations.

Partners are organizations or individuals with which/whom the Agency collaborates to achieve mutually agreed upon objectives and to secure participation of ultimate customers. Partners include host country governments, private voluntary organizations, civil society organizations (CSOs), indigenous and international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), universities, other U.S. government agencies, United Nations and other multilateral organizations, professional and business associations, and private businesses and individuals.

(View question)

Identified potential partners to donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 55.6 43.8-67.4
Did not provide 16.8 8.3-25.4
Do not know 17.5 8.1-26.8
Not checked 10.1 2.8-17.4

Funded partnerships for donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 4.0 0.3-7.6
Did not provide 54.7 42.8-66.6
Do not know 31.2 20.0-42.5
Not checked 10.1 2.8-17.4

Funding to build capacity of donor stakeholders to enter into a public-private partnership

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 11.3 4.0-18.6
Did not provide 51.0 39.1-62.9
Do not know 31.2 20.0-42.5
Not checked 6.4 0.6-12.3

Technical assistance to donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 21.6 12.3-30.9
Did not provide 37.1 25.6-48.5
Do not know 27.6 16.7-38.4
Not checked 13.8 5.3-22.2

Directly hosted an event to facilitate partnership with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Provided 36.9 25.3-48.5
Did not provide 29.1 18.8-39.4
Do not know 23.9 13.5-34.2
Not checked 10.1 2.8-17.4

Other assistance for donor stakeholders partnerships

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Did not provide 15.9 7.8-24.1
Do not know 22.3 12.3-32.3
Not checked 61.8 50.3-73.2

69a. If other assistance, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


70. As a result of the coordination efforts with those donor stakeholders, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Integration of donor stakeholders key priorities and needs when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 47.8 35.9-59.7
Remained about the same 23.6 14.0-33.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 25.9 15.4-36.4
Not checked 2.8 0.0-6.4

Formation of partnerships that included donor stakeholders when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 47.8 35.9-59.7
Remained about the same 17.1 8.9-25.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 28.6 17.9-39.4
Not checked 6.4 0.6-12.3

Amounts of budgeting or funding with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 26.8 16.0-37.5
Remained about the same 17.9 9.4-26.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 52.5 40.7-64.4
Not checked 2.8 0.0-6.4

Integration of budgeting or funding with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 32.3 21.1-43.5
Remained about the same 18.8 10.0-27.7
Don't know/ too soon to tell 42.4 30.6-54.2
Not checked 6.4 0.6-12.3

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 18.5 9.3-27.7
Remained about the same 26.2 15.9-36.4
Decreased 3.7 0.0-8.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 45.2 33.4-57.0
Not checked 6.4 0.6-12.3

Diversity of funding sources with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 25.0 14.7-35.2
Remained about the same 25.3 15.2-35.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 47.0 35.1-58.9
Not checked 2.8 0.0-6.4

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 16.6 7.6-25.5
Remained about the same 28.1 17.7-38.6
Decreased 6.4 0.6-12.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 46.1 34.2-58.0
Not checked 2.8 0.0-6.4

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 13.8 5.3-22.2
Remained about the same 27.2 17.0-37.4
Decreased 2.8 0.0-6.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 53.4 41.6-65.2
Not checked 2.8 0.0-6.4

Donor stakeholders commitment to FtF project objectives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 41.3 29.5-53.2
Remained about the same 20.8 11.7-29.9
Don't know/ too soon to tell 31.4 20.4-42.4
Not checked 6.4 0.6-12.3

Donor stakeholders involvement in FtF project implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 34.0 22.6-45.4
Remained about the same 17.1 8.9-25.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 38.8 27.1-50.4
Not checked 10.1 2.8-17.4

Donor stakeholders capacity to participate in FtF planning or implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 27.6 16.7-38.4
Remained about the same 23.6 14.0-33.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 38.8 27.1-50.4
Not checked 10.1 2.8-17.4

Donor stakeholders engagement with other FtF project partners

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 27.6 16.7-38.4
Remained about the same 23.6 14.0-33.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 42.4 30.6-54.2
Not checked 6.4 0.6-12.3

Other outcome with donor stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Remained about the same 2.8 0.0-6.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 35.2 23.8-46.6
Not checked 62.0 50.5-73.6

70a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Section 4E. Stakeholder Consultation and Coordination

71. In your view, has each of the following factors helped, hindered, or had no effect on host government's consultation with stakeholders to support the planning or implementation of FtF activities in _____?

Capacity refers to the knowledge, expertise, and resources (funding, staffing, etc.) necessary to carry out intended objectives.

(View question)

Host government political support

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 21.4 15.7-27.1
Somewhat helped 30.5 24.2-36.9
No effect 5.5 2.4-8.6
Somewhat hindered 6.2 3.0-9.4
Greatly hindered 1.0 0.0-2.3
No opinion 24.0 18.2-29.8
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Host government officials' capacity

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 9.3 5.2-13.4
Somewhat helped 28.5 22.3-34.8
No effect 7.3 3.8-10.7
Somewhat hindered 16.5 11.4-21.5
Greatly hindered 3.1 0.8-5.4
No opinion 24.0 18.2-29.8
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Host government funding for FtF-related projects

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 9.0 5.0-12.9
Somewhat helped 14.5 9.6-19.4
No effect 20.6 15.0-26.2
Somewhat hindered 8.2 4.4-12.1
Greatly hindered 2.1 0.2-4.0
No opinion 34.3 27.9-40.7
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Host government laws or regulations

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 4.1 1.5-6.8
Somewhat helped 12.0 7.4-16.5
No effect 23.2 17.5-28.9
Somewhat hindered 15.0 9.9-20.1
Greatly hindered 6.6 3.2-10.0
No opinion 27.8 21.8-33.8
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Host government political stability

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 15.4 10.4-20.4
Somewhat helped 18.6 13.3-23.9
No effect 15.6 10.7-20.5
Somewhat hindered 12.3 7.6-16.9
Greatly hindered 7.3 3.8-10.7
No opinion 19.6 14.2-24.9
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Level of agreement between host government and USG policies

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 14.1 9.2-18.9
Somewhat helped 35.0 28.5-41.6
No effect 9.0 5.3-12.8
Somewhat hindered 4.1 1.2-7.0
Greatly hindered 1.8 0.2-3.4
No opinion 24.7 18.9-30.6
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Public sector corruption

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Somewhat helped 3.1 0.8-5.4
No effect 12.0 7.6-16.5
Somewhat hindered 28.1 21.9-34.3
Greatly hindered 18.3 13.1-23.6
No opinion 27.1 21.1-33.1
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Private sector corruption

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Somewhat helped 3.7 1.0-6.5
No effect 18.3 13.0-23.5
Somewhat hindered 22.4 16.6-28.1
Greatly hindered 11.0 6.7-15.4
No opinion 33.3 26.8-39.7
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Non-profit sector capacity

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 6.2 3.0-9.5
Somewhat helped 26.7 20.6-32.9
No effect 9.8 5.9-13.6
Somewhat hindered 14.7 9.7-19.7
Greatly hindered 3.1 0.8-5.4
No opinion 28.2 22.1-34.2
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

For-profit sector capacity

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 7.6 4.0-11.2
Somewhat helped 19.5 14.1-25.0
No effect 14.6 9.8-19.4
Somewhat hindered 12.7 8.1-17.3
Greatly hindered 2.1 0.2-4.0
No opinion 29.1 22.9-35.3
Not checked 14.4 9.6-19.2

Donor capacity

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 14.1 9.2-18.9
Somewhat helped 29.5 23.1-35.8
No effect 11.5 7.4-15.6
Somewhat hindered 2.7 0.3-5.1
Greatly hindered 0.7 0.0-1.7
No opinion 28.9 22.8-35.0
Not checked 12.7 8.1-17.3

Independent media

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 7.2 3.5-10.9
Somewhat helped 21.9 16.1-27.7
No effect 22.4 16.8-28.1
Somewhat hindered 2.1 0.2-4.0
Greatly hindered 0.7 0.0-1.7
No opinion 30.6 24.4-36.8
Not checked 15.1 10.1-20.0

Security/crime

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 1.8 0.2-3.4
Somewhat helped 8.0 4.4-11.6
No effect 30.1 23.7-36.5
Somewhat hindered 18.2 12.9-23.5
Greatly hindered 3.9 1.4-6.3
No opinion 26.8 20.8-32.8
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Level of education/literacy

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 1.8 0.2-3.4
Somewhat helped 9.0 5.0-12.9
No effect 14.1 9.4-18.9
Somewhat hindered 30.4 24.0-36.8
Greatly hindered 10.1 6.1-14.2
No opinion 22.3 16.8-27.9
Not checked 12.3 7.8-16.8

State of public health

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 0.7 0.0-1.7
Somewhat helped 10.9 6.5-15.4
No effect 11.1 7.0-15.3
Somewhat hindered 25.4 19.4-31.4
Greatly hindered 12.0 7.4-16.6
No opinion 27.8 21.8-33.8
Not checked 12.0 7.6-16.5

Transportation infrastructure

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 1.8 0.2-3.4
Somewhat helped 5.2 2.2-8.2
No effect 9.4 5.5-13.3
Somewhat hindered 29.3 23.0-35.7
Greatly hindered 20.7 15.2-26.2
No opinion 22.3 16.8-27.9
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Utilities infrastructure

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 0.7 0.0-1.7
Somewhat helped 4.5 1.6-7.3
No effect 11.1 7.0-15.3
Somewhat hindered 31.1 24.6-37.5
Greatly hindered 17.9 12.6-23.3
No opinion 23.3 17.7-29.0
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Pervasiveness of discrimination

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Somewhat helped 4.5 1.6-7.3
No effect 37.1 30.4-43.7
Somewhat hindered 6.2 3.0-9.4
Greatly hindered 5.2 2.2-8.2
No opinion 33.3 27.0-39.7
Not checked 13.7 9.0-18.4

Available time for planning and consultation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Greatly helped 3.5 0.9-6.0
Somewhat helped 11.7 7.2-16.2
No effect 22.1 16.5-27.7
Somewhat hindered 15.1 10.1-20.0
Greatly hindered 4.9 2.1-7.7
No opinion 28.8 22.6-34.9
Not checked 14.0 9.2-18.9

Other factor

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
No effect 4.8 1.8-7.8
Greatly hindered 2.1 0.2-4.0
No opinion 19.6 14.2-25.0
Not checked 73.5 67.5-79.5

71a. If other factor, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


72. As a result of the coordination efforts with all stakeholders, did each of the following features of FtF planning or implementation in _____ generally increase, decrease, or remain about the same?

(View question)

Integration of all stakeholders key priorities and needs when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 43.2 36.5-50.0
Remained about the same 9.0 5.3-12.8
Decreased 1.8 0.2-3.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 34.7 28.2-41.2
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Formation of partnerships that included all stakeholders when planning for FtF projects or activities

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 39.5 32.8-46.2
Remained about the same 7.7 4.2-11.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 40.5 33.7-47.2
Not checked 12.3 7.8-16.8

Amounts of budgeting or funding with all stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 20.2 14.6-25.8
Remained about the same 19.5 14.2-24.8
Don't know/ too soon to tell 47.7 40.8-54.5
Not checked 12.7 8.1-17.3

Integration of budgeting or funding with all stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 20.3 14.8-25.8
Remained about the same 19.0 13.7-24.4
Don't know/ too soon to tell 49.3 42.5-56.2
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Complexity of budgeting or funding for FtF projects or activities all stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 13.4 8.7-18.1
Remained about the same 22.5 16.8-28.2
Decreased 2.4 0.3-4.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 49.0 42.2-55.9
Not checked 12.7 8.1-17.3

Diversity of funding sources with all stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 20.7 15.2-26.2
Remained about the same 20.0 14.5-25.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 44.2 37.5-51.0
Not checked 15.1 10.1-20.0

Complexity of implementation of FtF projects or activities with all stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 17.2 12.0-22.4
Remained about the same 18.4 13.2-23.6
Decreased 5.5 2.4-8.5
Don't know/ too soon to tell 47.6 40.8-54.4
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

Speed of implementation of FtF projects or activities with all stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 12.3 7.6-16.9
Remained about the same 16.4 11.6-21.3
Decreased 3.8 1.4-6.2
Don't know/ too soon to tell 53.4 46.6-60.2
Not checked 14.1 9.4-18.9

All stakeholders commitment to FtF project objectives

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 33.9 27.4-40.5
Remained about the same 12.9 8.5-17.3
Decreased 1.0 0.0-2.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 40.8 34.1-47.5
Not checked 11.3 7.0-15.7

All stakeholders involvement in FtF project implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 37.7 31.1-44.4
Remained about the same 7.1 3.9-10.3
Decreased 1.0 0.0-2.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 40.1 33.4-46.8
Not checked 14.0 9.2-18.9

All stakeholders capacity to participate in FtF planning or implementation

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 30.5 24.1-36.9
Remained about the same 13.9 9.4-18.5
Decreased 1.0 0.0-2.3
Don't know/ too soon to tell 41.9 35.2-48.6
Not checked 12.7 8.1-17.3

All stakeholders engagement with other FtF project partners

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Increased 35.6 29.0-42.3
Remained about the same 10.9 7.0-14.8
Don't know/ too soon to tell 40.8 34.1-47.5
Not checked 12.7 8.1-17.3

Other outcome with all stakeholders

(View question)

Question
Choices
FTF-PARTNER
Estimated Percentage
95 Percent
Confidence Interval
Remained about the same 1.4 0.0-3.1
Don't know/ too soon to tell 25.4 19.5-31.3
Not checked 73.2 67.2-79.3

72a. If other feature, please specify:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


73. To date, what has been the overall effect of FtF's country-led approach on program or project planning and implementation?

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Contact information

74. What is your preferred phone number and e-mail address (work or personal) in case we have follow-up questions about the responses to this survey?

(View question)

Phone number (including country code):

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


E-mail:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Submit your responses to GAO

75. This completes our survey. Are you ready to submit your final completed survey to GAO?

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


View and print responses

You may view and print your completed survey by clicking on the Summary link in the menu to the left.

(View question)