| Table III.3: States Reporting Whether Anticipatory Compounding is Authorized or Allowed in Their State | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anticipatory compounding authorized or allowed | |||||
| State | Yes, for both sterile and nonsterile compounding | Yes, for sterile compounding only | Yes, for nonsterile compounding only | No | No response |
| Alabama | ✓ | ||||
| Arizona | ✓ | ||||
| Arkansas | ✓ | ||||
| California | ✓ | ||||
| Colorado | ✓ | ||||
| Connecticut | ✓ | ||||
| Delaware | ✓ | ||||
| District of Columbia | ✓ | ||||
| Florida | ✓ | ||||
| Georgia | ✓ | ||||
| Guam | ✓ | ||||
| Hawaii | ✓ | ||||
| Idaho | ✓ | ||||
| Illinois | ✓ | ||||
| Iowa | ✓ | ||||
| Kansas | ✓ | ||||
| Kentucky | ✓ | ||||
| Louisiana | ✓ | ||||
| Maine | ✓ | ||||
| Maryland | ✓ | ||||
| Massachusetts | ✓ | ||||
| Michigan | ✓ | ||||
| Minnesota | ✓ | ||||
| Mississippi | ✓ | ||||
| Missouri | ✓ | ||||
| Montana | ✓ | ||||
| Nebraska | ✓ | ||||
| Nevada | ✓ | ||||
| New Hampshire | ✓ | ||||
| New Jersey | ✓ | ||||
| New Mexico | ✓ | ||||
| New York | ✓ | ||||
| North Carolina | ✓ | ||||
| North Dakota | ✓ | ||||
| Ohio | ✓ | ||||
| Oklahoma | ✓ | ||||
| Oregon | ✓ | ||||
| Pennsylvania | ✓ | ||||
| Rhode Island | ✓ | ||||
| South Carolina | ✓ | ||||
| South Dakota | ✓ | ||||
| Tennessee | ✓ | ||||
| Texas | ✓ | ||||
| Utah | ✓ | ||||
| Vermont | ✓ | ||||
| Virginia | ✓ | ||||
| Washington | ✓ | ||||
| West Virginia | ✓ | ||||
| Wisconsin | ✓ | ||||
| Wyoming | ✓ | ||||
| Source: GAO survey of state pharmacy regulatory bodies, survey question 14. | GAO-17-363SP |
| Notes: GAO surveyed the state pharmacy regulatory bodies in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and all but 4 completed the survey. |
| Anticipatory compounding is the creation of a drug product prior to receipt of an individual patient prescription in anticipation of receiving prescriptions based on historical prescribing patterns. |