Table III.3: States Reporting Whether Anticipatory Compounding is Authorized or Allowed in Their State | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anticipatory compounding authorized or allowed | |||||
State | Yes, for both sterile and nonsterile compounding | Yes, for sterile compounding only | Yes, for nonsterile compounding only | No | No response |
Alabama | ✓ | ||||
Arizona | ✓ | ||||
Arkansas | ✓ | ||||
California | ✓ | ||||
Colorado | ✓ | ||||
Connecticut | ✓ | ||||
Delaware | ✓ | ||||
District of Columbia | ✓ | ||||
Florida | ✓ | ||||
Georgia | ✓ | ||||
Guam | ✓ | ||||
Hawaii | ✓ | ||||
Idaho | ✓ | ||||
Illinois | ✓ | ||||
Iowa | ✓ | ||||
Kansas | ✓ | ||||
Kentucky | ✓ | ||||
Louisiana | ✓ | ||||
Maine | ✓ | ||||
Maryland | ✓ | ||||
Massachusetts | ✓ | ||||
Michigan | ✓ | ||||
Minnesota | ✓ | ||||
Mississippi | ✓ | ||||
Missouri | ✓ | ||||
Montana | ✓ | ||||
Nebraska | ✓ | ||||
Nevada | ✓ | ||||
New Hampshire | ✓ | ||||
New Jersey | ✓ | ||||
New Mexico | ✓ | ||||
New York | ✓ | ||||
North Carolina | ✓ | ||||
North Dakota | ✓ | ||||
Ohio | ✓ | ||||
Oklahoma | ✓ | ||||
Oregon | ✓ | ||||
Pennsylvania | ✓ | ||||
Rhode Island | ✓ | ||||
South Carolina | ✓ | ||||
South Dakota | ✓ | ||||
Tennessee | ✓ | ||||
Texas | ✓ | ||||
Utah | ✓ | ||||
Vermont | ✓ | ||||
Virginia | ✓ | ||||
Washington | ✓ | ||||
West Virginia | ✓ | ||||
Wisconsin | ✓ | ||||
Wyoming | ✓ |
Source: GAO survey of state pharmacy regulatory bodies, survey question 14. | GAO-17-363SP |
Notes: GAO surveyed the state pharmacy regulatory bodies in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and all but 4 completed the survey. |
Anticipatory compounding is the creation of a drug product prior to receipt of an individual patient prescription in anticipation of receiving prescriptions based on historical prescribing patterns. |