Survey of Area Census Office Managers - Questionnaire 1 (2/25/20-3/2/20)

U.S. Government Accountability Office

Contents

(Return to main page)

Introduction

Thank you in advance for taking the time to share this information with GAO. If you have any questions about the survey, please (the name and contact information for two GAO staff appeared here).

(View question)

Background

1. The Census Bureau provided us with your name and email address. Is the following information correct?

Name: _____
Email: _____

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Phone number

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Please provide the following information so that we can contact you, if necessary, to clarify your responses.

(View question)

First and last name:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Telephone number (Include area code):

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


E-mail address:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


2. In what month and year did you become ACOM or acting ACOM?

(View question)

Hire Month

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Hire Year

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


3. Aside from the 2020 Census, do you have any prior Census Bureau work experience (e.g., ACS, Census 2010, 2000, etc.)?

(View question)

  Yes No Unsure Number of respondents
% % %
RCC code 25.0 75.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 40.7 59.3 0.0 27
2599-CHI 20.0 80.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 11.1 88.9 0.0 27
3199-DAL 24.3 75.7 0.0 37
3299-LA 25.0 75.0 0.0 24
Total 24.4 75.6 0.0 168

4. If you are not the ACOM or Acting ACOM, please provide your title:

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Office Workers (i.e., Clerks and Office Operations Supervisors)

5. Considering your most recent experiences hiring office workers (i.e., clerks and office operations supervisors), how satisfied or dissatisfied have you been with the following?

(View question)

5a. Total number of positions authorized

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 31.0 58.6 3.4 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 22.2 48.1 14.8 7.4 3.7 3.7 0.0 27
2599-CHI 16.0 64.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 30.8 61.5 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 24.3 62.2 10.8 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 33.3 58.3 0.0 4.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 26.2 58.9 7.1 4.2 3.0 0.6 0.0 168

5b. Total number of authorized positions filled

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 17.9 53.6 14.3 3.6 10.7 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 14.8 51.9 0.0 18.5 11.1 3.7 0.0 27
2599-CHI 12.0 56.0 8.0 16.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 15.4 53.8 3.8 19.2 7.7 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 21.6 43.2 18.9 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 20.8 70.8 4.2 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 17.4 53.9 9.0 12.6 6.6 0.6 0.0 167

5c. Quality of individuals hired (e.g., skills, abilities, performance)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 10.7 35.7 28.6 17.9 7.1 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 11.1 48.1 18.5 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 12.0 44.0 24.0 16.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 11.5 65.4 11.5 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 5.4 45.9 32.4 13.5 2.7 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 12.5 33.3 33.3 16.7 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 10.2 45.5 25.1 14.4 4.8 0.0 0.0 167

5d. Fingerprinting procedures

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 10.3 41.4 10.3 24.1 13.8 0.0 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 0.0 25.9 25.9 37.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 8.0 32.0 40.0 8.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 15.4 42.3 7.7 30.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 11.1 36.1 22.2 22.2 5.6 2.8 0.0 36
3299-LA 0.0 41.7 29.2 16.7 12.5 0.0 0.0 24
Total 7.8 36.5 22.2 23.4 9.6 0.6 0.0 167

5e. Background check procedures

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 3.6 35.7 7.1 28.6 25.0 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 0.0 11.1 14.8 33.3 40.7 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 8.0 20.0 36.0 16.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 4.0 12.0 8.0 36.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 25
3199-DAL 0.0 21.6 21.6 32.4 18.9 2.7 2.7 37
3299-LA 0.0 25.0 20.8 33.3 20.8 0.0 0.0 24
Total 2.4 21.1 18.1 30.1 27.1 0.6 0.6 166

5f. Readiness of office workforce to support ACO activities (e.g., onboarding of field workers, scheduling hires for training)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 17.9 39.3 25.0 10.7 7.1 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 18.5 40.7 18.5 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 16.0 48.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 15.4 61.5 19.2 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 27.0 56.8 5.4 8.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 25.0 50.0 20.8 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 20.4 49.7 17.4 6.6 6.0 0.0 0.0 167

5g. If you would like to comment about other aspects of hiring office workers with which you are either satisfied or dissatisfied, please do so in the box below.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


ACO Management Team (i.e., Recruiting, Administrative, IT, Lead, and other Census Field Managers)

6. Considering your most recent experiences hiring ACO managers (e.g., recruiting, administrative, IT, lead, and other census field managers), how satisfied or dissatisfied have you been with the following?

(View question)

6a. Total number of positions authorized

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 21.4 67.9 7.1 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 30.8 50.0 3.8 7.7 3.8 3.8 0.0 26
2599-CHI 29.2 50.0 8.3 8.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 37.0 63.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 43.2 48.6 2.7 2.7 0.0 0.0 2.7 37
3299-LA 29.2 54.2 8.3 4.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 32.5 55.4 4.8 4.2 1.8 0.6 0.6 166

6b. Total number of authorized positions filled

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 17.9 60.7 0.0 10.7 10.7 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 11.5 42.3 11.5 15.4 15.4 3.8 0.0 26
2599-CHI 25.0 45.8 4.2 4.2 20.8 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 18.5 48.1 3.7 22.2 7.4 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 29.7 40.5 8.1 16.2 2.7 0.0 2.7 37
3299-LA 25.0 58.3 4.2 4.2 8.3 0.0 0.0 24
Total 21.7 48.8 5.4 12.7 10.2 0.6 0.6 166

6c. Quality of individuals hired via "battlefield promotions" (e.g., skills, abilities, performance)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 30.8 57.7 7.7 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 26
2299-NY
2399-PHI 22.2 48.1 11.1 11.1 3.7 3.7 0.0 27
2599-CHI 26.1 43.5 21.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 23
2999-ATL 18.5 59.3 18.5 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 43.2 48.6 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 37
3299-LA 41.7 29.2 12.5 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
Total 31.1 48.2 12.2 4.9 1.2 0.6 1.8 164

6d. Quality of individuals hired directly via USAJOBS (e.g., skills, abilities, performance)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 25.0 50.0 10.7 3.6 7.1 0.0 3.6 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 7.4 44.4 29.6 14.8 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 12.5 41.7 25.0 16.7 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 11.1 74.1 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 21.6 43.2 18.9 5.4 2.7 2.7 5.4 37
3299-LA 12.5 33.3 33.3 12.5 4.2 4.2 0.0 24
Total 15.6 47.9 21.6 8.4 3.6 1.2 1.8 167

6e. Fingerprinting procedures

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 7.4 37.0 14.8 25.9 11.1 3.7 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 7.4 22.2 25.9 29.6 14.8 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 12.5 33.3 37.5 12.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 19.2 46.2 11.5 15.4 7.7 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 13.5 40.5 13.5 16.2 10.8 2.7 2.7 37
3299-LA 4.2 54.2 4.2 29.2 8.3 0.0 0.0 24
Total 10.9 38.8 17.6 21.2 9.7 1.2 0.6 165

6f. Background check procedures

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 0.0 35.7 14.3 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 3.7 14.8 14.8 40.7 25.9 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 8.7 26.1 26.1 17.4 21.7 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 11.5 11.5 11.5 30.8 34.6 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 0.0 18.9 10.8 40.5 21.6 0.0 8.1 37
3299-LA 0.0 33.3 12.5 29.2 25.0 0.0 0.0 24
Total 3.6 23.0 14.5 31.5 25.5 0.0 1.8 165

6g. Readiness of office management team to support ACO activities

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 14.8 59.3 14.8 3.7 7.4 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 29.6 22.2 22.2 14.8 11.1 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 16.7 54.2 20.8 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 14.8 63.0 7.4 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 37.8 40.5 5.4 10.8 2.7 0.0 2.7 37
3299-LA 8.3 62.5 12.5 12.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 21.7 49.4 13.3 9.6 5.4 0.0 0.6 166

6h. If you would like to comment about other aspects of hiring ACO managers with which you are either satisfied or dissatisfied, please do so in the box below.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Recruitment for Field Workers (e.g., Enumerators and Census Field Supervisors)

7. Over the last 2 weeks, how satisfied or dissatisfied have you been with the following aspects of recruitment for field workers (i.e., enumerators and census field supervisors)?

(View question)

7a. Total ACO recruiting goal

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 17.2 44.8 31.0 3.4 0.0 3.4 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 23.1 50.0 11.5 7.7 7.7 0.0 0.0 26
2599-CHI 28.0 52.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 42.3 46.2 7.7 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 35.1 45.9 10.8 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 29.2 62.5 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
Total 29.3 49.7 13.2 5.4 1.8 0.6 0.0 167

7b. Total number of applicants relative to ACO recruiting goal

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 31.0 37.9 24.1 3.4 3.4 0.0 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 25.9 44.4 7.4 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 36.0 40.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 33.3 59.3 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 32.4 40.5 13.5 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 41.7 41.7 12.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
Total 33.1 43.8 13.0 7.7 2.4 0.0 0.0 169

7c. Number of applicants with the language skills needed in your area

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 10.3 41.4 31.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 11.1 44.4 25.9 11.1 0.0 3.7 3.7 27
2599-CHI 25.0 41.7 8.3 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 29.6 51.9 14.8 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 35.1 40.5 13.5 5.4 0.0 2.7 2.7 37
3299-LA 29.2 33.3 16.7 12.5 0.0 4.2 4.2 24
Total 23.8 42.3 18.5 11.9 0.0 1.8 1.8 168

7d. Quality of applicants (e.g., skills, abilities, performance)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 3.7 33.3 40.7 7.4 7.4 7.4 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 0.0 63.0 29.6 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 12.0 44.0 24.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 28.0 52.0 12.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25
3199-DAL 13.5 48.6 29.7 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 16.7 41.7 20.8 16.7 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 12.1 47.3 26.7 10.3 2.4 1.2 0.0 165

7e. Geographical distribution of applicants (i.e., Are the right numbers of applicants located throughout the area to get the work done?)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 20.7 44.8 20.7 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 14.8 63.0 14.8 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 20.0 48.0 20.0 8.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 22.2 55.6 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 8.1 45.9 29.7 13.5 2.7 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 20.8 50.0 16.7 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
Total 17.2 50.9 19.5 11.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 169

7f. Overall recruiting progress to meet later ACO hiring goals

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 17.9 32.1 17.9 21.4 7.1 3.6 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 18.5 44.4 11.1 22.2 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 29.2 54.2 12.5 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 29.6 55.6 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 30.6 47.2 16.7 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 36
3299-LA 29.2 45.8 16.7 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 24
Total 25.9 46.4 13.9 10.2 3.0 0.6 0.0 166

7g. Changes in enumerator pay rates to support recruiting and hiring goals

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 51.7 37.9 3.4 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 51.9 29.6 11.1 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 60.0 36.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 40.7 48.1 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 3.7 27
3199-DAL 64.9 35.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 41.7 54.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 24
Total 52.7 39.6 3.6 1.2 1.8 0.6 0.6 169

7h. If you would like to comment about other aspects of field worker recruitment with which you are either satisfied or dissatisfied, please do so in the box below.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Training Activities

8. In general, how satisfied or dissatisfied have you been with the following recently completed and ongoing trainings to prepare the ACO workforce (e.g., timing, content, quality, logistics)?

(View question)

8a. Group Quarters Advance Contact training for ACO workforce

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 10.3 48.3 20.7 17.2 3.4 0.0 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 15.4 42.3 23.1 3.8 11.5 3.8 0.0 26
2599-CHI 20.0 48.0 12.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25
2999-ATL 37.0 59.3 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 32.4 43.2 10.8 8.1 2.7 0.0 2.7 37
3299-LA 8.3 62.5 0.0 20.8 4.2 4.2 0.0 24
Total 21.4 50.0 11.3 11.9 3.6 1.2 0.6 168

8b. Enumerate Transitory Locations Advance Contact training for ACO workforce

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 13.8 41.4 27.6 6.9 3.4 6.9 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 15.4 38.5 26.9 7.7 7.7 3.8 0.0 26
2599-CHI 25.0 41.7 8.3 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 40.7 55.6 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 24.3 48.6 13.5 8.1 2.7 0.0 2.7 37
3299-LA 8.3 58.3 4.2 16.7 8.3 4.2 0.0 24
Total 21.6 47.3 13.8 10.8 3.6 2.4 0.6 167

8c. Update/Leave training for ACO workforce

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 6.9 34.5 20.7 3.4 3.4 0.0 31.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 15.4 19.2 15.4 3.8 7.7 3.8 34.6 26
2599-CHI 12.5 37.5 12.5 20.8 0.0 0.0 16.7 24
2999-ATL 40.7 51.9 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 8.1 48.6 13.5 5.4 0.0 0.0 24.3 37
3299-LA 12.5 41.7 8.3 4.2 0.0 4.2 29.2 24
Total 15.6 39.5 12.6 6.6 1.8 1.2 22.8 167

8d. Update/Enumerate training for ACO workforce

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 10.7 28.6 25.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 25.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 11.5 26.9 11.5 3.8 7.7 11.5 26.9 26
2599-CHI 8.7 39.1 8.7 21.7 0.0 0.0 21.7 23
2999-ATL 33.3 48.1 7.4 3.7 0.0 0.0 7.4 27
3199-DAL 8.1 37.8 16.2 5.4 0.0 0.0 32.4 37
3299-LA 8.3 37.5 4.2 4.2 0.0 4.2 41.7 24
Total 13.3 36.4 12.7 6.7 1.8 3.0 26.1 165

8e. If you would like to comment about specific aspects of these workforce trainings with which you are either satisfied or dissatisfied, please do so in the box below.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Group Quarters Advance Contact

9. In general, how satisfied or dissatisfied have you been with the following aspects of the Group Quarters Advance Contact (GQAC) operation?

(View question)

9a. Preparation for GQAC (e.g., guidance and training)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 13.8 41.4 31.0 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 19.2 42.3 15.4 7.7 11.5 3.8 0.0 26
2599-CHI 16.7 58.3 12.5 8.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 37.0 51.9 3.7 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 21.6 48.6 18.9 8.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 16.7 37.5 16.7 20.8 4.2 4.2 0.0 24
Total 21.0 46.7 16.8 10.2 4.2 1.2 0.0 167

9b. IT support (e.g., devices, accounts, systems, help desk)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 27.6 27.6 20.7 17.2 6.9 0.0 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 19.2 34.6 26.9 7.7 7.7 3.8 0.0 26
2599-CHI 17.4 26.1 17.4 8.7 30.4 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 29.6 37.0 11.1 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 32.4 29.7 18.9 8.1 10.8 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 8.3 50.0 8.3 16.7 12.5 4.2 0.0 24
Total 23.5 33.7 17.5 11.4 12.7 1.2 0.0 166

9c. How GQAC has prepared the ACO for GQE

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 13.8 41.4 31.0 10.3 0.0 3.4 0.0 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 15.4 42.3 23.1 7.7 7.7 3.8 0.0 26
2599-CHI 33.3 37.5 20.8 4.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
2999-ATL 40.7 48.1 3.7 0.0 3.7 0.0 3.7 27
3199-DAL 21.6 56.8 18.9 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 12.5 50.0 4.2 25.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 24
Total 22.8 46.7 17.4 7.2 3.0 2.4 0.6 167

9d. If you would like to comment about other aspects of the GQAC operation with which you are either satisfied or dissatisfied, please do so in the box below.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Enumerate Transitory Locations Advance Contact

10. In general, how satisfied or dissatisfied have you been with the following aspects of the Enumerate Transitory Locations Advance Contact (ETLAC) operation?

(View question)

10a. Preparation for ETLAC (e.g., guidance and training)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 6.9 34.5 37.9 6.9 3.4 6.9 3.4 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 15.4 30.8 23.1 11.5 7.7 7.7 3.8 26
2599-CHI 17.4 56.5 8.7 8.7 8.7 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 11.4 48.6 25.7 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 35
3299-LA 12.5 45.8 20.8 12.5 0.0 8.3 0.0 24
Total 15.9 47.0 20.1 9.1 3.0 3.7 1.2 164

10b. IT support (e.g., devices, accounts, systems, help desk)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 17.2 31.0 20.7 13.8 0.0 10.3 6.9 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 20.0 36.0 24.0 8.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 25
2599-CHI 13.0 43.5 17.4 4.3 21.7 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 33.3 37.0 14.8 11.1 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 27.8 36.1 25.0 8.3 2.8 0.0 0.0 36
3299-LA 13.0 47.8 17.4 13.0 4.3 4.3 0.0 23
Total 21.5 38.0 20.2 9.8 4.9 3.1 2.5 163

10c. How ETLAC has prepared the ACO for ETL

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 6.9 41.4 27.6 3.4 0.0 17.2 3.4 29
2299-NY
2399-PHI 15.4 26.9 23.1 11.5 11.5 3.8 7.7 26
2599-CHI 17.4 52.2 8.7 13.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 37.0 51.9 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 27
3199-DAL 20.0 48.6 17.1 11.4 0.0 2.9 0.0 35
3299-LA 12.5 45.8 20.8 8.3 0.0 12.5 0.0 24
Total 18.3 44.5 17.7 7.9 3.0 6.1 2.4 164

10d. If you would like to comment about other aspects of the ETLAC operation with which you are either satisfied or dissatisfied, please do so in the box below.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Partnership Program

11. In general, how satisfied or dissatisfied have you been with the following aspects of the partnership program?

(View question)

11a. Communication and coordination between the ACO and partnership program specialist

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 10.7 42.9 14.3 17.9 14.3 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 3.8 26.9 23.1 11.5 34.6 0.0 0.0 26
2599-CHI 4.3 13.0 13.0 26.1 43.5 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 7.4 29.6 11.1 22.2 25.9 0.0 3.7 27
3199-DAL 16.2 29.7 21.6 13.5 16.2 2.7 0.0 37
3299-LA 20.8 33.3 12.5 16.7 16.7 0.0 0.0 24
Total 10.9 29.7 16.4 17.6 24.2 0.6 0.6 165

11b. Responsiveness to ACO requests

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 14.3 35.7 25.0 10.7 14.3 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 8.0 24.0 24.0 12.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 25
2599-CHI 4.3 17.4 8.7 30.4 39.1 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 14.8 22.2 18.5 25.9 18.5 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 10.8 32.4 29.7 16.2 8.1 2.7 0.0 37
3299-LA 25.0 29.2 12.5 16.7 16.7 0.0 0.0 24
Total 12.8 27.4 20.7 18.3 20.1 0.6 0.0 164

11c. Helpfulness to ACO operations

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 14.8 37.0 25.9 11.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 7.7 23.1 23.1 15.4 30.8 0.0 0.0 26
2599-CHI 0.0 17.4 13.0 30.4 39.1 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 14.8 25.9 18.5 25.9 14.8 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 13.9 25.0 36.1 11.1 11.1 2.8 0.0 36
3299-LA 29.2 20.8 12.5 16.7 20.8 0.0 0.0 24
Total 13.5 25.2 22.7 17.8 20.2 0.6 0.0 163

11d. Assistance with local challenges

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 10.7 39.3 21.4 17.9 10.7 0.0 0.0 28
2299-NY
2399-PHI 3.8 15.4 30.8 15.4 30.8 3.8 0.0 26
2599-CHI 4.3 8.7 21.7 30.4 34.8 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 15.4 23.1 34.6 11.5 15.4 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 13.9 16.7 47.2 13.9 5.6 2.8 0.0 36
3299-LA 21.7 26.1 17.4 17.4 17.4 0.0 0.0 23
Total 11.7 21.6 30.2 17.3 17.9 1.2 0.0 162

11e. Clarity of roles and responsibilities between the ACO and partnership program specialist

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 7.4 44.4 14.8 22.2 11.1 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 12.0 16.0 24.0 16.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 25
2599-CHI 4.5 9.1 9.1 31.8 45.5 0.0 0.0 22
2999-ATL 18.5 14.8 29.6 18.5 18.5 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 13.5 32.4 16.2 18.9 16.2 2.7 0.0 37
3299-LA 8.3 33.3 12.5 20.8 25.0 0.0 0.0 24
Total 11.1 25.9 17.9 21.0 23.5 0.6 0.0 162

11f. Quality of partnership program specialist (e.g., skills, abilities, performance)

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 18.5 29.6 25.9 14.8 11.1 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 12.0 20.0 28.0 8.0 24.0 4.0 4.0 25
2599-CHI 4.5 22.7 18.2 18.2 31.8 4.5 0.0 22
2999-ATL 18.5 25.9 25.9 11.1 14.8 3.7 0.0 27
3199-DAL 21.6 35.1 24.3 2.7 13.5 2.7 0.0 37
3299-LA 16.7 41.7 4.2 8.3 25.0 4.2 0.0 24
Total 16.0 29.6 21.6 9.9 19.1 3.1 0.6 162

11g. Opportunities to provide feedback on the program

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 14.8 22.2 25.9 11.1 22.2 3.7 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 4.0 20.0 28.0 20.0 20.0 4.0 4.0 25
2599-CHI 4.5 9.1 18.2 27.3 40.9 0.0 0.0 22
2999-ATL 18.5 18.5 33.3 7.4 18.5 3.7 0.0 27
3199-DAL 5.4 27.0 27.0 21.6 16.2 2.7 0.0 37
3299-LA 20.8 20.8 20.8 16.7 20.8 0.0 0.0 24
Total 11.1 20.4 25.9 17.3 22.2 2.5 0.6 162

11h. Input provided by partnership program to ACO action plan

(View question)

  Very satisfied

Generally satisfied
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
Generally dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable

Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 14.8 29.6 18.5 18.5 11.1 0.0 7.4 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 8.0 16.0 28.0 16.0 28.0 4.0 0.0 25
2599-CHI 4.5 9.1 9.1 22.7 54.5 0.0 0.0 22
2999-ATL 14.8 22.2 29.6 14.8 18.5 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 2.7 32.4 29.7 8.1 18.9 5.4 2.7 37
3299-LA 17.4 17.4 13.0 17.4 26.1 8.7 0.0 23
Total 9.9 22.4 22.4 15.5 24.8 3.1 1.9 161

11i. If you would like to comment about other aspects of the partnership program with which you are either satisfied or dissatisfied, please do so in the box below.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Work Environment

12. Considering all aspects of your experience during the entire time you have been ACOM during the 2020 Census, please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about your work environment.

(View question)

12a. My immediate supervisor(s) treated me fairly and with respect.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 63.0 29.6 3.7 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 44.4 29.6 11.1 7.4 3.7 3.7 0.0 27
2599-CHI 52.2 34.8 0.0 8.7 4.3 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 66.7 29.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 70.3 18.9 8.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 58.3 25.0 8.3 4.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 60.0 27.3 6.1 3.6 2.4 0.6 0.0 165

12b. My job made good use of my skills and abilities.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 44.4 44.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 61.5 19.2 11.5 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 26
2599-CHI 56.5 26.1 13.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 65.4 34.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26
3199-DAL 64.9 27.0 2.7 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 62.5 33.3 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
Total 59.5 30.7 5.5 3.1 1.2 0.0 0.0 163

12c. In general, I was utilized effectively.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 37.0 44.4 14.8 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 40.7 33.3 18.5 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 47.8 39.1 4.3 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 55.6 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 56.8 35.1 5.4 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 58.3 33.3 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
Total 49.7 38.2 8.5 2.4 1.2 0.0 0.0 165

12d. My immediate supervisor(s) acted with honesty and integrity toward me.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 59.3 29.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 50.0 26.9 11.5 3.8 3.8 3.8 0.0 26
2599-CHI 56.5 30.4 4.3 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 74.1 18.5 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 70.3 18.9 8.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 66.7 20.8 8.3 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 63.4 23.8 7.3 3.0 1.8 0.6 0.0 164

12e. My immediate supervisor(s) ensured that there was a clear link between my performance and recognition of it.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 33.3 25.9 25.9 7.4 3.7 0.0 3.7 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 33.3 29.6 11.1 11.1 7.4 7.4 0.0 27
2599-CHI 34.8 21.7 21.7 8.7 13.0 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 55.6 37.0 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 62.2 18.9 16.2 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 54.2 33.3 8.3 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 46.7 27.3 14.5 5.5 4.2 1.2 0.6 165

12f. My immediate supervisor(s) made decisions in a timely manner.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 37.0 29.6 22.2 7.4 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 29.6 37.0 7.4 11.1 11.1 3.7 0.0 27
2599-CHI 30.4 21.7 17.4 26.1 4.3 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 59.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 59.5 29.7 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 52.2 39.1 0.0 4.3 4.3 0.0 0.0 23
Total 45.7 31.7 9.8 7.3 4.9 0.6 0.0 164

12g. My immediate supervisor(s) respected and valued differences among individuals (e.g., sex, race, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, age, cultural background, disability).

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 63.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 44.4 29.6 14.8 7.4 0.0 3.7 0.0 27
2599-CHI 65.2 21.7 4.3 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 70.4 18.5 7.4 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 73.0 21.6 2.7 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 37
3299-LA 75.0 16.7 4.2 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 65.5 23.6 5.5 3.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 165

12h. Sufficient effort was made to get the opinions and thinking of people who work here.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 29.6 29.6 22.2 11.1 7.4 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 29.6 22.2 18.5 14.8 11.1 3.7 0.0 27
2599-CHI 34.8 30.4 4.3 13.0 17.4 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 51.9 37.0 7.4 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 45.9 29.7 13.5 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 66.7 25.0 4.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 24
Total 43.0 29.1 12.1 9.7 5.5 0.6 0.0 165

12i. The RCC was responsive to problems the ACO reported.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 14.8 33.3 18.5 14.8 18.5 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 14.8 37.0 7.4 22.2 14.8 0.0 3.7 27
2599-CHI 13.0 26.1 26.1 17.4 17.4 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 25.9 40.7 22.2 3.7 3.7 3.7 0.0 27
3199-DAL 18.9 43.2 18.9 13.5 5.4 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 16.7 37.5 25.0 8.3 12.5 0.0 0.0 24
Total 17.6 37.0 19.4 13.3 11.5 0.6 0.6 165

12j. My management team received the guidance and training needed to meet ACO goals.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 11.1 55.6 22.2 3.7 7.4 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 18.5 44.4 14.8 14.8 7.4 0.0 0.0 27
2599-CHI 34.8 21.7 21.7 17.4 4.3 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 33.3 48.1 11.1 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
3199-DAL 35.1 37.8 21.6 2.7 2.7 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 16.7 58.3 16.7 4.2 4.2 0.0 0.0 24
Total 25.5 44.2 18.2 7.3 4.8 0.0 0.0 165

12k. Training I received as ACOM prepared me to do my job.

(View question)

  Strongly agree
Generally agree
Neither agree nor
disagree
Generally disagree
Strongly disagree
Don't know/Unsure
Not Applicable
Number of respondents
% % % % % % %
RCC code 7.4 44.4 11.1 33.3 3.7 0.0 0.0 27
2299-NY
2399-PHI 7.4 25.9 18.5 18.5 22.2 3.7 3.7 27
2599-CHI 21.7 30.4 17.4 17.4 13.0 0.0 0.0 23
2999-ATL 14.8 44.4 11.1 11.1 11.1 0.0 7.4 27
3199-DAL 10.8 35.1 24.3 21.6 8.1 0.0 0.0 37
3299-LA 4.2 25.0 33.3 20.8 12.5 0.0 4.2 24
Total 10.9 34.5 19.4 20.6 11.5 0.6 2.4 165

12l. If you would like to comment about other aspects of the work environment with which you are either satisfied or dissatisfied, please do so in the box below.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Other Comments

13. If you would like to comment about (a) other practices, challenges, or factors that have affected the ACO's preparation for the census over the last few months, or (b) topics that you think we should consider exploring in future surveys, please do so in the box below.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


14. If you have completed the survey, please click the "Completed" circle below. Clicking "Completed" lets us know that you are finished and that you want us to use your answers.

(View question)

data intentionally not reported


Thank You

Thank you for your participation!

(View question)

You may view and print your completed survey by clicking the "Print" button below.

(View question)