| 73. | If implemented appropriately, how effective are the basic conservation systems in the Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) in addressing the requirements for soil erosion reduction? | ||
| (CHECK ONLY ONE ANSWER) | |||
| 1. | Extremely effective | ||
| 2. | Very effective | ||
| 3. | Moderately effective | ||
| 4. | Somewhat effective | ||
| 5. | Slightly or not effective | ||
| 6. | No response | ||
| 74. | If implemented appropriately, how effective, are the alternative conservation systems in the FOTG in addressing the requirements for soil erosion reduction? | ||
| (CHECK ONLY ONE ANSWER) | |||
| 1. | Extremely effective | ||
| 2. | Very effective | ||
| 3. | Moderately effective | ||
| 4. | Somewhat effective | ||
| 5. | Slightly or not effective | ||
| 6. | No response | ||
| 75. | In your opinion, to what extent do the following areas of guidance in the current National Food Security Act Manual (NFSAM) need to be improved? |
| (CHECK ONE FOR EACH AREA OF GUIDANCE.) |
| Needs very great improvement | Needs great improvement | Needs moderate improvement | Needs some improvement | Needs little or no improvement | No response | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75a | Conservation compliance | ||||||
| 75b | Sodbuster provisions | ||||||
| 75c | Swampbuster provisions, overall | ||||||
| 75d | Wetland mitigation and minimal effects provisions | ||||||
| 75e | Status reviews provisions | ||||||
| 75f | Appeals provisions | ||||||
| 75g | Other | ||||||
| 76. | For those areas needing improvement, please explain below. |
|