|
40.
|
In collaborating with other offices, agencies, or institutions on teacher quality, what level of priority has your state agency for higher education placed on each of the following teacher quality areas? |
| (Select one answer in each row.) |
| Very high priority | High priority | Medium priority | Low priority | Very low or no priority | Not applicable/No basis to judge | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40a.
|
Recruitment or selection | ||||||
| 40b.
|
Teacher preparation | ||||||
| 40c.
|
Certification or licensure | ||||||
| 40d.
|
Placement or assignment | ||||||
| 40e.
|
Retention | ||||||
| 40f.
|
Induction or mentoring | ||||||
| 40g.
|
Professional development | ||||||
| 40h.
|
Performance or accountability | ||||||
| 40i.
|
Other teacher quality areas – Please specify below. | ||||||
|
|
Please specify other teacher quality areas here. | |
|
41.
|
In your opinion, how effective, if at all, has collaborating with other offices, agencies, or institutions been at fostering an integrated approach to improving teacher quality in your state? | ||
| 1. | |||
| 2. | |||
| 3. | |||
| 4. | |||
| 5. | |||
| 6. | |||
|
42.
|
In your opinion, to what extent, if at all, has collaborating with other offices, agencies, or institutions led to specific changes in education policy or program implementation that address the need to improve teacher quality? | ||
| 1. | |||
| 2. | |||
| 3. | |||
| 4. | |||
| 5. | (Click here to skip to question 44.) | ||
| 6. | (Click here to skip to question 44.) | ||
|
43.
|
In your opinion, what are the top three changes resulting from collaborating with other offices, agencies, or institutions on initiatives to improve teacher quality? Also, briefly explain why. |
|
|
Change #1 and why | |
|
|
Change #2 any why | |
|
|
Change #3 and why | |
| Full Report: GAO-09-593 | Table of Contents | Previous | Next |