Section I (Continued) -
Developing Criteria for Performance Evaluation

14.	How involved, if at all, has your state agency for higher education been in developing criteria for evaluating the performance of university-based PK-12 teacher preparation programs?
	1.		Very greatly involved - Continue.
	2.		Greatly involved - Continue.
	3.		Moderately involved - Continue.
	4.		Somewhat involved - Continue.
	5.		Not involved (Click here to skip to question 17.)
	6.		Not applicable/Do not know (Click here to skip to question 17.)

15.	Which of the following offices, agencies, and institutions has your state agency for higher education collaborated with in developing criteria for evaluating the performance of university-based PK-12 teacher preparation programs? (Select all that apply.)
	1.		State education agency (SEA)
	2.		Governor’s Office
	3.		Legislative committees
	4.		Professional standards board
	5.		Public school districts
	6.		Public schools
	7.		Public school associations (e.g., PTAs, PTOs, etc.)
	8.		Teacher unions or associations
	9.		Colleges/universities
	10.		Businesses
	11.		Civic or community organizations
	12.		Other - Please specify below.
	13.		None of the above (did not collaborate)

	Please specify other entities here.

16.	Currently, what level of progress, if any, has been made in developing criteria for evaluating the performance of university-based PK-12 teacher preparation programs?
	1.		Completed
	2.		High level of progress
	3.		Moderate level of progress
	4.		Low level of progress
	5.		Very low level or no progress
	6.		Not applicable/Do not know

---

Full Report: GAO-09-593

Table of Contents | Previous | Next