|
17.
|
In your opinion, how adequate or inadequate are the tools you currently use to review time spent on a case or matter by Assistant U.S. Attorneys in your unit? |
| (Check one in each row.) |
| Much more than adequate | More than adequate | Adequate | Less than adequate | Much less than adequate | No basis to judge/Do not use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17a.
|
Quarterly review of the case or matter | ||||||
| 17b.
|
Biannual review of the case or matter | ||||||
| 17c.
|
Periodic case/matter review as the need arises | ||||||
| 17d.
|
Individual meetings covering a specific case or matter | ||||||
| 17e.
|
Weekly (or other time period) calendar covering specific case work | ||||||
| 17f.
|
Other - Please describe below | ||||||
|
|
Please describe other tools you currently use to review time spent. |
|
18.
|
In your opinion, how important or unimportant is it for you to review the amount of time being spent on a case or matter by Assistant U.S. Attorneys in your unit? | ||
| (Check only one answer.) | |||
| 1. | Very important | ||
| 2. | Important | ||
| 3. | Moderately important | ||
| 4. | Of little importance | ||
| 5. | Of no importance | ||
| 6. | No opinion | ||
|
19.
|
Please explain why you believe it is either important or unimportant for you to review the amount of time being spent on a case or matter by Assistant U.S. Attorneys in your unit? |
|