Return to Table of Contents
 
Program-level data
Below are links to various views of the program information. Clicking on a link beside the state name will open a table of that state's county-level program data.

  Analysis by
Alabama Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Arizona Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Arkansas Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
California Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Florida Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Georgia Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Idaho Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Illinois Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Iowa Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Kansas Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Kentucky Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Louisiana Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Minnesota Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Mississippi Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Missouri Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Montana Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Nebraska Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
New Mexico Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
North Dakota Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Ohio Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Oklahoma Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Oregon Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Pennsylvania Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
South Carolina Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
South Dakota Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Tennessee Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Texas Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Utah Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Washington Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
West Virginia Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum
Wisconsin Dominant RUCA Rural-Urban Continuum

For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported."
(GAO-06-294)